Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • #redirect [[sensitivity and specificity]]
    41 bytes (4 words) - 10:50, 7 March 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[sensitivity and specificity]]
    41 bytes (4 words) - 11:10, 2 December 2008
  • #redirect [[Sensitivity and specificity]]
    41 bytes (4 words) - 07:05, 9 December 2007
  • #redirect [[Sensitivity and specificity]]
    41 bytes (4 words) - 07:05, 9 December 2007
  • #redirect [[Sensitivity and specificity]]
    41 bytes (4 words) - 04:15, 7 March 2008
  • #redirect [[Sensitivity and specificity]]
    41 bytes (4 words) - 04:16, 7 March 2008
  • #redirect [[sensitivity and specificity]]
    41 bytes (4 words) - 10:50, 7 March 2008
  • A structured physical examination of an injured ankle that, with high [[sensitivity and specificity]], will determine if any bones of the ankle or lower leg are broken
    203 bytes (30 words) - 00:41, 4 October 2008
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 100% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 74%
    1 KB (197 words) - 10:20, 19 July 2010
  • ...pulation and the study population, which leads to an overestimation of the sensitivity and specificity of a test.
    220 bytes (31 words) - 20:08, 8 September 2009
  • ...fter passive leg raising!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
    2 KB (217 words) - 09:05, 6 October 2010
  • A structured physical examination of an injured ankle that, with high [[sensitivity and specificity]], will determine if any bones of the ankle or lower leg are broken. By usi
    382 bytes (57 words) - 17:55, 11 June 2010
  • ...=1980 |pmid=6446157 |doi=}}</ref> However, in one study this reduces the [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of the test from 67% to 41%.<ref name="pmid17601462">{{cite j ...">{{cite journal |author=Majlesi J, Togay H, Unalan H, Toprak S |title=The sensitivity and specificity of the Slump and the Straight Leg Raising tests in patients with lumbar dis
    6 KB (798 words) - 02:53, 15 June 2010
  • 5 KB (659 words) - 09:52, 11 June 2010
  • 3 KB (367 words) - 11:15, 10 August 2010
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    344 bytes (43 words) - 17:04, 14 July 2008
  • * Total lymphocyte count of more than 2000 has [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] or 95% * Total lymphocyte count of less than 1200 has [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 95%
    2 KB (309 words) - 22:03, 3 June 2011
  • ...ef name="pmid12559279">{{cite journal| author=Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG| title=Sensitivity and specificity of commonly available bladder tumor markers versus cytology: results of a c
    2 KB (244 words) - 11:11, 2 September 2011
  • ...h have a [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] over 90% but have a [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of less than 70%.<ref name="pmid19586584"/><ref name="pmid177
    3 KB (397 words) - 13:33, 15 June 2012
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    485 bytes (59 words) - 05:16, 27 June 2009
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    497 bytes (62 words) - 19:55, 11 January 2010
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    499 bytes (64 words) - 20:32, 11 January 2010
  • The likelihood ratio is an alternative to [[sensitivity and specificity]] for the numeric interpretation of [[diagnostic test]]s. In a [[randomized Likelihood ratios are related to [[sensitivity and specificity]].
    5 KB (738 words) - 20:35, 15 August 2012
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    643 bytes (79 words) - 18:05, 11 January 2010
  • ! &nbsp;!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]!![[Sensitivity
    8 KB (1,026 words) - 12:49, 10 February 2011
  • ...ction with a pooled [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of 0.97, [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 0.96."<ref name="pmid17636770">{{cite journal |author=Abba
    3 KB (452 words) - 21:58, 22 February 2009
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]: 60%<ref name="pmid2187961"/>, 64%<ref name="pmid8309266">{{c * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]: 70%<ref name="pmid2187961"/>
    6 KB (890 words) - 16:47, 13 May 2023
  • ! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
    3 KB (418 words) - 13:21, 15 February 2009
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity| sensitivity]] = 92% * [[Sensitivity and specificity| specificity]] is uncertain and ranges from 88 to 96%
    8 KB (1,056 words) - 13:29, 10 February 2023
  • ====Sensitivity and specificity====
    4 KB (610 words) - 23:42, 24 May 2012
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    881 bytes (140 words) - 23:40, 24 April 2010
  • On [[physical examination]], the most [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] findings are:<ref name="pmid20229121">{{cite journal| author=Ch
    1 KB (145 words) - 09:18, 18 August 2011
  • ...theterization reported a [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] and [[Sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 88% and 56%, respectively. <ref name="pmid23227919">{{cite
    4 KB (597 words) - 08:16, 6 September 2013
  • ...d a [[sensitivity and specificity|negative predictive value]] of 74% and [[sensitivity and specificity|negative predictive value]] of 3% ([http://medinformatics.uthscsa.edu/calcu
    9 KB (1,280 words) - 11:44, 2 February 2023
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 24% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 55%
    4 KB (561 words) - 17:16, 13 June 2010
  • ** [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 83% ** [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 96%
    6 KB (818 words) - 12:51, 8 September 2020
  • ...d on [[physical examination]] by inability to full extend the elbow. The [[sensitivity and specificity]] is 92% and 61%.<ref name="pmid18324503">{{cite journal |author=Lamprakis
    1 KB (189 words) - 21:49, 25 February 2010
  • The digiti quinti signa may be more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] than the pronator drift test.<ref name="pmid20799429">{{cite jo
    1 KB (167 words) - 09:01, 19 November 2011
  • Sigmoidoscopy has a [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of 31% in detecting pseudomembranes as compared to [[colonoso
    2 KB (305 words) - 07:42, 19 August 2011
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
    9 KB (1,188 words) - 11:45, 2 February 2023
  • ...w.nlm.nih.gov/cgi/mesh/2007/MB_cgi?term=Sensitivity+and+Specificity |title=Sensitivity and specificity |accessdate=2007-12-09 |author=National Library of Mediicne |authorlink= |c Successful application of sensitivity and specificity is an important part of practicing [[evidence-based medicine]].
    18 KB (2,610 words) - 05:45, 15 March 2024
  • In adults, albuminuria is a more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] than total protein in detecting [[chronic kidney disease]] from
    2 KB (351 words) - 23:56, 10 August 2011
  • * [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity ]] 98.5% * [[sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 98.0%
    9 KB (1,197 words) - 15:44, 6 September 2014
  • ...or [[ligament]], usually of the [[anterior cruciate ligament]] with high [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]].<ref name="pmid2356496">{{cite journal |author=Hardaker WT, ...nation (McMurray's, Apley's, and joint line tenderness) is more than 70% [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] for meniscal injuries.<ref name="pmid17939613">{{cite journal |
    5 KB (694 words) - 23:11, 9 January 2014
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 97.2% (95% [[Confidence interval|CI]], 96.2% to 98.0%) * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 87.4% ([[Confidence interval|CI]], 84.5% to 89.8%)
    9 KB (1,111 words) - 11:34, 2 April 2010
  • ! Finding!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
    8 KB (1,156 words) - 17:15, 18 December 2013
  • ...n]] is probably over 3 ([[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]]=80%; [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]=76%). Presumably this is related to the viscosity of the [[in
    7 KB (894 words) - 11:18, 29 December 2010
  • Regarding blood tests, the [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of tests among 73 patients were:<ref name="pmid17071206"/>
    6 KB (743 words) - 11:50, 8 November 2010
  • 11 KB (1,523 words) - 12:08, 12 May 2015
  • ...ore specifically, [[enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay]]) tend to be more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]].<ref name="pmid15096330">{{cite journal |author=Stein PD, Hull ! &nbsp; !! [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]]!! [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]
    9 KB (1,251 words) - 13:11, 11 May 2013
  • ...a central black eschar ([[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] 55%; [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] 92%).<ref name="pmid18614328">{{cite journal |author=Busch BA
    7 KB (937 words) - 10:01, 5 January 2011
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 82% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 79%
    7 KB (939 words) - 06:11, 18 October 2013
  • {{main|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    3 KB (601 words) - 11:23, 26 January 2011
  • ...ing and thus direct initial diagnostic and treatment plans; however, the [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] is low.<ref name="pmid20370741">{{cite journal| author=Palami
    14 KB (1,917 words) - 20:22, 8 April 2013
  • ! Patients!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
    9 KB (1,169 words) - 02:01, 29 October 2013
  • ! &nbsp;!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
    11 KB (1,470 words) - 14:35, 18 March 2024
  • ! Finding!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
    10 KB (1,401 words) - 10:09, 7 December 2013
  • ...[d-dimer]] test may not reliably detect thromboses of the calf vein with [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of about 65%.<ref name="pmid16175012">{{cite journal |author=
    6 KB (821 words) - 16:29, 25 April 2012
  • * [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] 95% * [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] 64%
    19 KB (2,612 words) - 08:23, 3 December 2013
  • ...te journal |author=Erbel R, Schweizer P, Krebs W, Meyer J, Effert S |title=Sensitivity and specificity of two-dimensional echocardiography in detection of impaired left ventricul
    4 KB (520 words) - 20:57, 29 August 2011
  • ...preferred rapid diagnostic test for evaluating urethritis. It is highly [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive and specific]] for documenting both urethritis and the presence o
    4 KB (567 words) - 03:03, 16 February 2010
  • ...ivity]] for differentiating bacterial from viral infections was 92% with [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 73%.<ref name="pmid15307030">{{cite journal| author=Simon
    21 KB (2,985 words) - 18:51, 17 February 2015
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 87% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 32%
    20 KB (2,688 words) - 21:34, 19 November 2012
  • * [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] = 97%<ref name="pmid11180735">{{cite journal |author=Gould MK * [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] = 78%<ref name="pmid11180735"/>to 82%<ref name="pmid18235105"
    20 KB (2,787 words) - 16:37, 3 November 2013
  • ...ime]] (dAPTT) or dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT). These are more [[sensitivity and specificity|specific]] tests. These antibodies may interact with other risk factors suc
    6 KB (754 words) - 08:53, 1 April 2011
  • ...f> This study reported a [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] and [[Sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 94% and 83%, respectively. In populations similar to thos
    20 KB (2,703 words) - 21:02, 31 October 2011
  • ...ref> were more accurate than physician judgment because of the increased [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of the prediction rules. ! Finding!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
    22 KB (2,899 words) - 14:57, 31 January 2015
  • ...one has insufficient [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of 83% ([[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 74%)<ref name="pmid18403624">{{cite journal |author=Moon W
    14 KB (1,909 words) - 08:31, 14 October 2013
  • 26 KB (3,990 words) - 13:22, 2 February 2023
  • The classic [[sign (medical)|signs]] on [[physical examination]] have a [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of less than 10%.<ref name="pmid19273776">{{cite journal |aut The transthoracic echocardiogram has a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 65% and 95% if the echocardiographer believes there is 'pr
    17 KB (2,327 words) - 13:00, 22 December 2015
  • |+Sensitivity and specificity of cardiac stress tests<ref name="pmid10357690">{{cite journal |author=Garb ! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]
    41 KB (5,532 words) - 23:14, 6 October 2013
  • ! &nbsp;!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Likelihood ratio]]+ !! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Likelihood ratio]]-
    19 KB (2,555 words) - 09:02, 13 June 2010
  • * In one study, normal overnight oximetry was very [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] and so if normal, sleep apnea was unlikely.<ref name="pmid83571 ...rations/hour, was very [[Sensitivity and specificity|specific]], but not [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]].<ref name="pmid8539678">{{cite journal| author=Ryan PJ, Hilton
    24 KB (3,388 words) - 10:33, 12 August 2015
  • ...alidating the prediction of lower urinary tract infection in primary care: sensitivity and specificity of urinary dipsticks and clinical scores in women. | journal=Br J Gen Pract
    8 KB (1,141 words) - 11:40, 7 July 2011
  • ...immunoenzyme technique]], and [[polymerase chain reaction]] testing. The [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of these tests range from 63% to 95%.<ref>Beyer WE. Heterogen The [[polymerase chain reaction]] is the most [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] test and is as sensitive as viral culture.<ref name="pmid192813
    37 KB (5,103 words) - 13:22, 2 February 2023
  • | Diagnosis||sensitiv*[Title/Abstract] OR sensitivity and specificity[MeSH Terms] OR diagnos*{Title/Abstract] OR diagnosis[MeSH:noexp] OR diagnos
    47 KB (6,522 words) - 15:13, 27 December 2013
  • : See also [[Bayes Theorem]], [[sensitivity and specificity]], and [[likelihood ratio]]. ...66 |issn=}}</ref><br/>([[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] plus [[Sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]) ||Easy to understand<br/>Stable with prevalence of disease
    36 KB (5,130 words) - 20:23, 15 August 2012
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 88.4% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 81.1%
    25 KB (3,339 words) - 07:16, 2 July 2014
  • ...creased from 0.795 to 0.799 and 12% of patients had improved estimates - [[sensitivity and specificity|net reclassification improvement]] (NRI) = 11%).<ref name="pmid20031795">{{
    18 KB (2,514 words) - 01:24, 1 June 2012
  • ...und that DNA was more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] but less [[sensitivity and specificity|specific]]<ref name="pmid18838724">{{cite journal |author=Ahlquist DA, Sarg ...se negative rate (1-[[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]) 22%<br/>[[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 78%|| align="center"|[http://medinformatics.uthscsa.edu/calcu
    31 KB (4,194 words) - 13:28, 10 February 2023
  • ...kul S, Maneerat J, Sa-nguansermsri T, Dhananjayanonda P, Tongsong T |title=Sensitivity and specificity of mean corpuscular volume testing for screening for alpha-thalassemia-1 an
    23 KB (3,285 words) - 17:32, 11 March 2024
  • * Total lymphocyte count of more than 2000 has [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] or 95% * Total lymphocyte count of less than 1200 has [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 95%
    31 KB (4,264 words) - 13:22, 2 February 2023
  • ...me!!rowspan="2"|[[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!!rowspan="2"|[[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]!! colspan="2"| For 5% prevalence of osteoporosis <br/>as rep ...ty and specificity|Sensitivity]]<br/>(taken from Table 1 of Johansson)!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]<br/>(calculated from Table 1 of Johansson)!! Positive predict
    49 KB (6,739 words) - 13:28, 10 February 2023
  • ...s [[c-reactive protein]]||"myocardial infarction and CHD-related death"||[[sensitivity and specificity|Net reclassification improvement]] = 12%<ref>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1161 ...www.reynoldsriskscore.org/ Reynolds Score])||All cardiovascular events|| [[sensitivity and specificity|Net reclassification improvement]] = 8% (in men)<ref name="pmid18997194">{
    31 KB (4,198 words) - 11:24, 23 July 2015
  • ...of recent studies show that alpha-fetoprotein determination lacks adequate sensitivity and specificity for effective surveillance (and for diagnosis). Thus, surveillance has to b
    12 KB (1,601 words) - 08:30, 5 October 2012
  • ...nt Health Questionnaire (PHQ2) is a shorter questionnaire that may be as [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] as the [[Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders| ...e PHQ2 is positive, then the SALSA questionnaire may be used to increase [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]<ref name="pmid9855385">{{cite journal |author=Brody DS, Hahn
    32 KB (4,377 words) - 13:17, 2 February 2023
  • ...disease never develops in many subjects with this genotype}}</ref>, its [[sensitivity and specificity]] are insufficient (65 and 68 percent, respectively) to be used as a diagno
    54 KB (7,423 words) - 21:04, 1 May 2016
  • ...specificity|Specificity]]!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
    50 KB (7,152 words) - 09:23, 6 January 2012
  • ...title=The accuracy of patients' judgments of disease probability and test sensitivity and specificity. | journal=J Fam Pract | year= 1998 | volume= 47 | issue= 1 | pages= 44-52
    13 KB (1,793 words) - 00:30, 24 August 2011
  • ...ore specifically, [[enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay]]) tend to be more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]].<ref name="pmid15096330">{{cite journal |author=Stein PD, Hull ! &nbsp; !! [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]]!! [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]
    56 KB (7,879 words) - 10:57, 8 March 2024
  • Direct visualization by [[esophagogastroduodenoscopy]](EGD) is very [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] for [[peptic ulcer disease]], but may not detect all possible u
    39 KB (5,137 words) - 10:07, 28 February 2024
  • ...i= |url= |issn=}}</ref> Unfortunately, neither of these studies used the [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] [[polymerase chain reaction]] as a reference standard. ! &nbsp;!! Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
    46 KB (6,252 words) - 17:10, 31 October 2013
  • 25 KB (3,570 words) - 12:10, 31 March 2024
  • ...mbol of the examination, but the finding of preliminary abnormalities is [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitive but not selective]]. Particular sounds, such as [[rales]] and [[r
    24 KB (3,459 words) - 15:27, 26 July 2014
  • ...disease never develops in many subjects with this genotype}}</ref>, its [[sensitivity and specificity]] are insufficient (65 and 68 percent, respectively) to be used as a diagno
    16 KB (2,171 words) - 08:34, 6 March 2024
  • ...te journal |author=Erbel R, Schweizer P, Krebs W, Meyer J, Effert S |title=Sensitivity and specificity of two-dimensional echocardiography in detection of impaired left ventricul
    73 KB (10,150 words) - 21:46, 20 August 2014
  • ...relevant documents that are successfully retrieved. This is the same as [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]]. The recall has also been called the "yield"<ref name="pmid20 .../cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=22249990 }} </ref> This is the same as [[sensitivity and specificity|positive predictive value]].
    42 KB (5,875 words) - 11:11, 29 March 2012
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Likelihood ratio +]] 8.6 * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Likelihood ratio -]] 0.26
    70 KB (9,828 words) - 17:34, 10 February 2024
  • 48 KB (6,766 words) - 00:54, 21 October 2013
  • ...ear=2007 |pmid=18064524 |doi=10.1007/s11606-007-0330-1 |issn=}}</ref> or [[sensitivity and specificity]] are two methods. It is unclear which method is better according to the re * [[Sensitivity and specificity]]
    36 KB (4,860 words) - 07:03, 18 October 2013
  • ...versus peripheral). However, most other methods studied showed acceptable sensitivity and specificity (both >0.75) and negative predictive value (>99%)".<ref name="pmid15767623"
    20 KB (2,755 words) - 00:19, 12 January 2015
  • An alternative algorithm that diagnoses diabetes with high [[sensitivity and specificity]]:<ref name="pmid19236612">{{cite journal |author=Manley SE, Sikaris KA, Lu
    98 KB (13,470 words) - 13:28, 10 February 2023
  • ...d=638510 PubMed Central]</ref> Fast recovery within 2-3 seconds, is more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] than specific at detecting hypoalbuminemia. Presumably this is
    21 KB (2,921 words) - 23:03, 22 May 2013
  • ! &nbsp; !! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] Dobutamine echocardiography [[stress test]]ing may be the most [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] non-invasive test.<ref name="pmid14594892">{{cite journal |auth
    81 KB (10,863 words) - 17:35, 10 February 2024
  • ...ic test under evaluation, while taking into account the possibly imperfect sensitivity and specificity of the reference test. This hierarchical model accounts for both within and
    73 KB (9,970 words) - 13:21, 2 February 2023
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity]]
    55 KB (7,444 words) - 06:21, 29 August 2013
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity]]
    63 KB (8,790 words) - 06:57, 2 March 2021