Search results

{{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}

{{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}

The likelihood ratio is an alternative to [[sensitivity and specificity]] for the numeric interpretation of [[diagnostic test]]s. In a [[randomized Likelihood ratios are related to [[sensitivity and specificity]].

{{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}

!  !![[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]!![[Sensitivity

...ction with a pooled [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of 0.97, [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 0.96."<ref name="pmid17636770">{{cite journal |author=Abba

* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]: 60%<ref name="pmid2187961"/>, 64%<ref name="pmid8309266">{{c * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]: 70%<ref name="pmid2187961"/>

! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

* [[Sensitivity and specificity| sensitivity]] = 92% * [[Sensitivity and specificity| specificity]] is uncertain and ranges from 88 to 96%

====Sensitivity and specificity====

{{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}

On [[physical examination]], the most [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] findings are:<ref name="pmid20229121">{{cite journal| author=Ch

...theterization reported a [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] and [[Sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 88% and 56%, respectively. <ref name="pmid23227919">{{cite

...d a [[sensitivity and specificity|negative predictive value]] of 74% and [[sensitivity and specificity|negative predictive value]] of 3% ([http://medinformatics.uthscsa.edu/calcu

* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 24% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 55%

** [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 83% ** [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 96%

...d on [[physical examination]] by inability to full extend the elbow. The [[sensitivity and specificity]] is 92% and 61%.<ref name="pmid18324503">{{cite journal |author=Lamprakis

The digiti quinti signa may be more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] than the pronator drift test.<ref name="pmid20799429">{{cite jo

Sigmoidoscopy has a [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of 31% in detecting pseudomembranes as compared to [[colonoso

* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

...w.nlm.nih.gov/cgi/mesh/2007/MB_cgi?term=Sensitivity+and+Specificity |title=Sensitivity and specificity |accessdate=2007-12-09 |author=National Library of Mediicne |authorlink= |c Successful application of sensitivity and specificity is an important part of practicing [[evidence-based medicine]].

In adults, albuminuria is a more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] than total protein in detecting [[chronic kidney disease]] from

* [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity ]] 98.5% * [[sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 98.0%

...or [[ligament]], usually of the [[anterior cruciate ligament]] with high [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]].<ref name="pmid2356496">{{cite journal |author=Hardaker WT, ...nation (McMurray's, Apley's, and joint line tenderness) is more than 70% [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] for meniscal injuries.<ref name="pmid17939613">{{cite journal |

* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 97.2% (95% [[Confidence interval|CI]], 96.2% to 98.0%) * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 87.4% ([[Confidence interval|CI]], 84.5% to 89.8%)

! Finding!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

...n]] is probably over 3 ([[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]]=80%; [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]=76%). Presumably this is related to the viscosity of the [[in

Regarding blood tests, the [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of tests among 73 patients were:<ref name="pmid17071206"/>

...ore specifically, [[enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay]]) tend to be more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]].<ref name="pmid15096330">{{cite journal |author=Stein PD, Hull ! &nbsp; !! [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]]!! [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]

...a central black eschar ([[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] 55%; [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] 92%).<ref name="pmid18614328">{{cite journal |author=Busch BA

* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 82% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 79%

{{main|Sensitivity and specificity}}

...ing and thus direct initial diagnostic and treatment plans; however, the [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] is low.<ref name="pmid20370741">{{cite journal| author=Palami

! Patients!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

! &nbsp;!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

! Finding!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

...[d-dimer]] test may not reliably detect thromboses of the calf vein with [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of about 65%.<ref name="pmid16175012">{{cite journal |author=

* [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] 95% * [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] 64%

...te journal |author=Erbel R, Schweizer P, Krebs W, Meyer J, Effert S |title=Sensitivity and specificity of two-dimensional echocardiography in detection of impaired left ventricul

...preferred rapid diagnostic test for evaluating urethritis. It is highly [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive and specific]] for documenting both urethritis and the presence o

...ivity]] for differentiating bacterial from viral infections was 92% with [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 73%.<ref name="pmid15307030">{{cite journal| author=Simon

* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 87% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 32%

* [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] = 97%<ref name="pmid11180735">{{cite journal |author=Gould MK * [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] = 78%<ref name="pmid11180735"/>to 82%<ref name="pmid18235105"

...ime]] (dAPTT) or dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT). These are more [[sensitivity and specificity|specific]] tests. These antibodies may interact with other risk factors suc

...f> This study reported a [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] and [[Sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 94% and 83%, respectively. In populations similar to thos

...ref> were more accurate than physician judgment because of the increased [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of the prediction rules. ! Finding!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

...one has insufficient [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of 83% ([[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 74%)<ref name="pmid18403624">{{cite journal |author=Moon W

The classic [[sign (medical)|signs]] on [[physical examination]] have a [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of less than 10%.<ref name="pmid19273776">{{cite journal |aut The transthoracic echocardiogram has a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 65% and 95% if the echocardiographer believes there is 'pr