User talk:David E. Volk

[User bio is in User:Your Name]

Welcome

Tasks: start a new article • add basic, wanted or requested articles • add definitions • add metadata • edit new pages

Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start. You'll probably want to know how to get started as an author. Just look at Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, our help system and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. Be sure to stay abreast of events via Twitter. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any administrator for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun!

You can find some more information about our collaboration groups if you follow this link CZ:Workgroups.You can always ask me on my talk page or others about how to proceed or any other question you might have.

Kind Regards, Robert Tito |  Talk  15:12, 26 March 2007 (CDT)

Welcome, new editor! We're very glad you've joined us. Here are pointers for a quick start. Also, when you get a chance, please read The Editor Role. You can look at Getting Started and our help system for other introductory pages. It is also important, for project-wide matters, to join the Citizendium-L (broadcast) mailing list. Announcements are also available via Twitter. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any administrator for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and thank you! We appreciate your willingness to share your expertise, and we hope to see your edits on Recent changes soon. --Larry Sanger 20:58, 3 April 2007 (CDT)

ToApprove

Congratulations on your first Approval! I did change the date for you and approved the extra edits as you stated on my talk page. When you want to find the latest version, follow these steps: 1)click on the history tab, 2)click on 'compare selected version...' button, 3)click on the 'Revision as of [date]' above the previous diff, 4)click on 'newer revision' under the article title, 5)copy the address from the address bar.. and you got it! It is a long way around. If you ever find a better way, do let me know! Matt Innis (Talk) 18:57, 9 October 2007 (CDT)

Virus template

I think there already is a model for this that has been made; for proteins I think. We should be able to copy that and just change the verbage. --Robert W King 16:44, 16 October 2007 (CDT)

Wait, do you want an infobox? --Robert W King 16:45, 16 October 2007 (CDT)

Ok, I'm caught up. You want an infobox. I can make this easily *but* I must know what criteria you want to be displayed. I had no input with the chemistry infobox I made and thus it is severely lacking in detail. --Robert W King 16:46, 16 October 2007 (CDT)

Isotopes

Can do easily. How do you want it formatted? --Robert W King 12:51, 18 October 2007 (CDT)

small addition to NMR

see if you like this addition - else delete it. Robert Tito |  Talk 

Sppedy Delete - How to

David, at any time to request a deletion, you can simply add {{speedydelete|Insert some reason here}} to the article/image space. --Robert W King 17:34, 7 December 2007 (CST)

Subpagination thanks

Thanks for your work subpaginating articles, David! --Larry Sanger 18:38, 23 December 2007 (CST)

Redirects - How to

It's easy. Say you have an article called "Big Easy" and you want a redirect from "The Big Easy". Just go to the Search box at the top left of the screen. Type in "The Big Easy". You'll get a message saying that it doesn't exist and asking if you want to create it. Click to create a new article. You'll now have a blank edit page. Scroll down to the bottom of the screen to Special Characters. Click on the link that says #REDIRECX [[]]. That should put it up on the edit page. Then type "Big Easy" in between the bracket. Save. That will make the redirect.

allotrope

Hi David, we both wrote something about allotrope/allotropy. Maybe it is better that we merge the two articles and put a redirect?--Paul Wormer 08:19, 29 December 2007 (CST)

Steroid

See query at Steroid. - Robert Badgett 23:49, 31 December 2007 (CST)

River names

David, thanks for your remark about river names. Please give me a note when you have more information regarding naming of river articles. --Igor Grešovnik 12:39, 4 January 2008 (CST)

New NMR guy

Hi David, I'm also glad that we have a new (physical) chemist on board. The content of his NMR article is OK, but the format needs fixing up. How will we proceed, we simply go ahead and fix it (and explain in the talk page why), or will we ask him to adapt it himself? He signed the article and I'm afraid that if we take his signature away he will misunderstand that. --Paul Wormer 09:51, 12 January 2008 (CST)

test

 David E. Volk   talk

NMR spectroscopy : an attempt to get it approved

--Sekhar Talluri 16:39, 16 January 2008 (CST)

I edited the metadata page for my article on NMR spectroscopy in an attempt to send it for approval by you and P. Wormer as editors. However, it appears that somehow I have approved it myself:-) Please feel free to undo/do/fix whatever is necessary , but do consider it for approval. Sincerely

Catalogs

David: Kindly do not remove the Psychology Catalogs category from the bottom of psych pages. It is there to provide a structural guideline.

Secondly, (re: Tao Te Ching) it is fprmatting convention to bold only the topic of an article, not variations on spelling, etc.

Thanks... --Michael J. Formica 18:36, 21 January 2008 (CST)

Drug pages

see Chemistry style guide for guidance now David E. Volk 12:38, 10 March 2008 (CDT)

Chem info box

"A box used to contain MW, formula, KEGG, CAS, etc is still under development."

What kind of information do you think should be contained in the box, and how should it be formatted? One thing that bothers me about WPs infoboxes (and I don't know if you feel the same, but please respond) is that they go entirely overboard on numerical inclusions. How can the information in an infobox be used to relay a fundamental principal about a particular chemical, given x amount of properities? --Robert W King 12:02, 22 February 2008 (CST)

Robert, here are my thoughts on Chem_infobox:

First, I think the structures should not be in the box, because large chemicals need big drawing to be readable. Also, the IUPAC names of some compounds are 2-3 sentences long, so I would keep those out also. In my opinion, I would like to keep the box simple and contain the following:

• Name of Chemical
• Molecular Formula
• Molecular Mass
• Hazards
• CAS #
• (optional) Link to an MSDS form, plenty of sites to choose from (this might instead be on the external links page)

BTW, I have programmed in several languages and would like learn how to make templates someday. Could you email me a copy of some code to that? David E. Volk 13:37, 22 February 2008 (CST)

What should the representation of the molecular formula be like? Should it exist in text form, or by some graphic? Is the mass a single number or derived from a forumla? What kinds of hazards should be displayed? What is CAS? Besides the link from MSDS, is there any information from the MSDS that should be included?

Also, what is the overall theme that should be described: how to utilize a chemical compound, or how to safeguard against it, or the dangers of it?

Designing a template is pretty easy as long as you know how to create tables in HTML. The wiki-code uses certain markup which represents the same as table data, rows, columns, and their syntaxes. Basically, almost any html can be employed when creating a template (including DIVs and stylesheets to an extent). However, there are some ways to script your results, including variables and quantification statements such as "if" "exist" and others. I'll dig up the mediawiki help page for you... it's not complicated. --Robert W King 13:52, 22 February 2008 (CST)

Details:

• Chemical formulas will look like this C₆H₁₂O₂

• Molecular Mass, a single number derived from the formula, will look like this: 236.23 g/mol

• CAS # is the Chemical Abstract Service reference number for a chemical

• Hazards can just be a text box saying things like: "Explosive, Corrosive, Liver Toxin, known Carcinogen, Radioactive".

• MSDS = "Material Safety Data Sheet" that must be shipped whenever a chemical is purchased. It contains a full gruesome detail of all hazards, melting points, molecular mass, and other details for the reader who wants to know everything. There is not a single MSDS for each chemical. That is, for a given chemical, you can usually find many different versions, like one from Aldrich, one from DuPont, etc.

• Theme The theme of chemistry articles, like all CZ, should be about the uses of the chemical first, ie why is it important. Note that I added the "Common Uses" to the list above, just before hazards. I had forgotten this on the list. WP uses the 4-diamonds in a diamond type of drawing for hazards, but only experienced chemists know what this means. For the general audience I think simple text is the way to go with hazards. However, hazards should be after common uses IMHO. David E. Volk 14:07, 22 February 2008 (CST)

Azole

Congratulations on approval! D. Matt Innis 11:08, 26 February 2008 (CST)

Approval of Phosphorus

David, I have scanned the article and made a few cosmetic copy edits. Much of the subject matter is way above my knowledge of chemistry, but I am very impressed with the depth of detail that you and Paul Wormer have provided.

The only serious criticism I have is that the article has only one reference. In my opinion, an article of that length and detail should have at least 8-12 references. I think that providing the needed references should be relatively easy for you and Paul.

Once the references have been provided, I would be pleased to start the approval process. I think that what I must do in the "required for ToApprove template" section of the MetaData template is:

• article url= Provide the article url
• now= Provide the time (CST) and date
• ToA editor= Provide my name
• date= Provide the date that is 6 days after the now=date

Is that correct? If not, please let me know. Regards, - Milton Beychok 12:17, 26 February 2008 (CST)

d-orbitals

Good afternoon David, blushing I make a confession: my knowledge of bonding in phosphorus was outdated. Prompted by Milton I checked some literature and found that the idea of bonding by d-orbitals is outdated. I should have known this because I know Kutzelnigg (who discovered this) quite well and have heard him speak zillions of times. But I was never much interested in second row atoms and didn't pay attention. I added a paragraph, and let the old part still intact, maybe it looks silly now, have a look and give your honest opinion. --Paul Wormer 08:52, 27 February 2008 (CST)

David, I see that you left both explanations of difference in bonding between nitrogen and phosphorus intact. Don't you think that the old-fashioned explanation, based on d-orbitals, should go?--Paul Wormer 02:31, 28 February 2008 (CST)

That's Life!

David, see my rply: http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/User_talk:Anthony.Sebastian#That.27s_Life.21 --Anthony.Sebastian 14:43, 29 February 2008 (CST)

NMR

Hi David, this article needs your attention. Thanks, D. Matt Innis 19:34, 29 February 2008 (CST).

Approval of Phosphorus article

David, I believe that last week we agreed that I would start the Approval process for the Phosphorus article after you finished reviewing the article yourself. Please let me know whether you did in fact finish your review and I will then proceed. Thanks, Milton Beychok 12:54, 3 March 2008 (CST)

I have started the Approval process of Phosphorus as of a few minutes ago. Milton Beychok 13:39, 3 March 2008 (CST)

DrugBank template

See use of new DrugBank template in development at acetaminophen. - Robert Badgett 07:48, 5 March 2008 (CST)

Your proposal to create workgroup style guides

Hello. No driver is listed in the proposal record for "Create workgroup style guides" which you started. Every proposal must have a driver, a champion who is filling in the details of the proposal and driving it along. Do consider becoming the driver yourself; don't be worried that this is hard as I will help you at every step if necessary. If you find a driver, please make sure that the proposal record on CZ:Proposals/New is updated. If no driver can be found within three days, then the proposal becomes inactive. Your newly-appointed Proposals Manager, Jitse Niesen 09:43, 6 March 2008 (CST)

David, I want to work with you on this proposal. --Robert W King 11:44, 6 March 2008 (CST)

This is the day that Phosphorus is supposed to be approved.

David: What else needs to be done, if anything, to finish the approval process? No one other than myself has yet signed the nomination on the Metadata template, although I thought you said that you and Paul Wormer could do so. Regards, Milton Beychok 10:58, 10 March 2008 (CDT)

David, I note that you and Paul have now signed the nomination. Is there anything else that I have to do? I must leave in the next hour for the rest of the day and would like to know before I leave. Thanks, Milton Beychok 12:18, 10 March 2008 (CDT)

Milton, you have nothing further to do. A constable with taken of the rest. Thanks. David E. Volk 12:29, 10 March 2008 (CDT)

Links to categories

You can have a link to Category:Articles to Approve, without adding the page the link is in (e.g. your user page) to the category with this: "[[:Category:Articles to Approve]]", which produces this: Category:Articles to Approve. (Note the leading :.) Hope that's useful... J. Noel Chiappa 11:33, 10 March 2008 (CDT)

Thank you very much Noel. David E. Volk 11:38, 10 March 2008 (CDT)

Life ver 1.2 Approved!

Congratulations! Thanks for your help, --D. Matt Innis 22:19, 10 March 2008 (CDT)

Phosphorus Approved!

Two in a row! I think chemistry could be on a roll ;-) --D. Matt Innis 22:51, 10 March 2008 (CDT)

EZarticle-closed-auto

• Why did you conclude that Bankruptcy is closed to outside participation? I don't see anything on the course page to suggest that.
• What's the difference between Category:Eduzendium Workgroup and Category:Eduzendium articles? Why have both?

Warren Schudy 22:08, 11 March 2008 (CDT)

I created the Category:Eduzendium articles just as a way to keep them separate from policy and course pages. It does not have to be that way. I just thought it might be more convenient. I might add that they were originally in Category:Eduzendium. The workgroup category would definitely be more appropriate, I didn't know that existed. Chris Day (talk) 22:10, 11 March 2008 (CDT)

I am just trying to clear the unchecklisted articles page. First there was EZarticle, then EZarticle-closed-auto, and before that some of them had what appeared to be hand-written warnings not to edit. We need whoever is in charge of EZ to tell the people what to put on their pages, and then we wouldn't need to do it. It seems EZarticle-closed-auto provides the best warning flag, so I have been putting that on the pages that I seem to think needs it.

As for the page in question, I thought all EZ pages were closed so that only the students work on it. I might be mistaken. David E. Volk 08:03, 12 March 2008 (CDT)

Help with approval nomination for Chemical engineering

David, I'm looking for someone to nominate the Chemical engineering article for approval. Can you help me? Milton Beychok 23:08, 12 March 2008 (CDT)

Milton, I have made suggestions for improvement before approval, on the talk page. Please reply when you have fixed these small errors. David E. Volk 10:04, 13 March 2008 (CDT)

David, I agree with all of your comments on the Talk page of the Chemical engineering article and I have made the appropriate changes. Thanks for your help. Milton Beychok 10:58, 13 March 2008 (CDT)

Thanks for starting the process, David. Could you perhaps ask Paul Wormer to second the nomination? Or someone else? Milton Beychok 15:09, 13 March 2008 (CDT)

Disambiguation

I was going to suggest we have a disambiguation template (a la Wikipedia) which both did a standard notice, and put the page in a category); sigh, that's on my (lengthy) to-do list. You wanna deal with it? :-) J. Noel Chiappa 14:34, 14 March 2008 (CDT)

I haven't made any templates yet, but if I attempt one, it will be the chem_info template that needs to be made, something like the elem_infobox template, except for chemicals. David E. Volk 14:37, 14 March 2008 (CDT)

Oh, they're not too hard (at least, the simpler ones), and help is a click away. Anyway, it turns out that {{disambig}} already exists; we just need to get people to stick it on the bottom of all disambig pages. J. Noel Chiappa 16:07, 14 March 2008 (CDT)

PS: Might have been best not to checklist that duplicate Neanderthal article, in case the one gets turned into just a redir. Oh well, water, bridges... J. Noel Chiappa 16:07, 14 March 2008 (CDT)

So, should we used category disambig or the template disambig, or both?

As for the neanderthal stuff, I assume the professor(s) will give priority to whoever signed up first. They can still do the work, get the grade, and we can merge them later perhaps? I just wanted to make the students aware, and I notified the EZ coordinator as well. David E. Volk 16:11, 14 March 2008 (CDT)

Ah, {{disambig}} adds pages to the category automatically. I guess it's OK to use just the category, as long as at least one gets used. I'll ask people what they think when I have time... J. Noel Chiappa 22:25, 14 March 2008 (CDT)