Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • #redirect [[Sensitivity and specificity]]
    41 bytes (4 words) - 07:05, 9 December 2007
  • #redirect [[Sensitivity and specificity]]
    41 bytes (4 words) - 04:15, 7 March 2008
  • #redirect [[Sensitivity and specificity]]
    41 bytes (4 words) - 04:16, 7 March 2008
  • #redirect [[sensitivity and specificity]]
    41 bytes (4 words) - 10:50, 7 March 2008
  • #redirect [[sensitivity and specificity]]
    41 bytes (4 words) - 10:50, 7 March 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[sensitivity and specificity]]
    41 bytes (4 words) - 11:10, 2 December 2008
  • #redirect [[Sensitivity and specificity]]
    41 bytes (4 words) - 07:05, 9 December 2007
  • A structured physical examination of an injured ankle that, with high [[sensitivity and specificity]], will determine if any bones of the ankle or lower leg are broken
    203 bytes (30 words) - 00:41, 4 October 2008
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 100% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 74%
    1 KB (197 words) - 10:20, 19 July 2010
  • ...pulation and the study population, which leads to an overestimation of the sensitivity and specificity of a test.
    220 bytes (31 words) - 20:08, 8 September 2009
  • ...fter passive leg raising!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
    2 KB (217 words) - 09:05, 6 October 2010
  • A structured physical examination of an injured ankle that, with high [[sensitivity and specificity]], will determine if any bones of the ankle or lower leg are broken. By usi
    382 bytes (57 words) - 17:55, 11 June 2010
  • ...=1980 |pmid=6446157 |doi=}}</ref> However, in one study this reduces the [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of the test from 67% to 41%.<ref name="pmid17601462">{{cite j ...">{{cite journal |author=Majlesi J, Togay H, Unalan H, Toprak S |title=The sensitivity and specificity of the Slump and the Straight Leg Raising tests in patients with lumbar dis
    6 KB (798 words) - 02:53, 15 June 2010
  • 5 KB (659 words) - 09:52, 11 June 2010
  • 3 KB (367 words) - 11:15, 10 August 2010
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    344 bytes (43 words) - 17:04, 14 July 2008
  • * Total lymphocyte count of more than 2000 has [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] or 95% * Total lymphocyte count of less than 1200 has [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 95%
    2 KB (309 words) - 22:03, 3 June 2011
  • ...ef name="pmid12559279">{{cite journal| author=Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG| title=Sensitivity and specificity of commonly available bladder tumor markers versus cytology: results of a c
    2 KB (244 words) - 11:11, 2 September 2011
  • ...h have a [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] over 90% but have a [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of less than 70%.<ref name="pmid19586584"/><ref name="pmid177
    3 KB (397 words) - 13:33, 15 June 2012
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    485 bytes (59 words) - 05:16, 27 June 2009
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    497 bytes (62 words) - 19:55, 11 January 2010
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    499 bytes (64 words) - 20:32, 11 January 2010
  • The likelihood ratio is an alternative to [[sensitivity and specificity]] for the numeric interpretation of [[diagnostic test]]s. In a [[randomized Likelihood ratios are related to [[sensitivity and specificity]].
    5 KB (738 words) - 20:35, 15 August 2012
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    643 bytes (79 words) - 18:05, 11 January 2010
  • ! &nbsp;!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]!![[Sensitivity
    8 KB (1,026 words) - 12:49, 10 February 2011
  • ...ction with a pooled [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of 0.97, [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 0.96."<ref name="pmid17636770">{{cite journal |author=Abba
    3 KB (452 words) - 21:58, 22 February 2009
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]: 60%<ref name="pmid2187961"/>, 64%<ref name="pmid8309266">{{c * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]: 70%<ref name="pmid2187961"/>
    6 KB (890 words) - 16:47, 13 May 2023
  • ! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
    3 KB (418 words) - 13:21, 15 February 2009
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity| sensitivity]] = 92% * [[Sensitivity and specificity| specificity]] is uncertain and ranges from 88 to 96%
    8 KB (1,056 words) - 13:29, 10 February 2023
  • ====Sensitivity and specificity====
    4 KB (610 words) - 23:42, 24 May 2012
  • {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}
    881 bytes (140 words) - 23:40, 24 April 2010
  • On [[physical examination]], the most [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] findings are:<ref name="pmid20229121">{{cite journal| author=Ch
    1 KB (145 words) - 09:18, 18 August 2011
  • ...theterization reported a [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] and [[Sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 88% and 56%, respectively. <ref name="pmid23227919">{{cite
    4 KB (597 words) - 08:16, 6 September 2013
  • ...d a [[sensitivity and specificity|negative predictive value]] of 74% and [[sensitivity and specificity|negative predictive value]] of 3% ([http://medinformatics.uthscsa.edu/calcu
    9 KB (1,280 words) - 11:44, 2 February 2023
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 24% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 55%
    4 KB (561 words) - 17:16, 13 June 2010
  • ** [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 83% ** [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 96%
    6 KB (818 words) - 12:51, 8 September 2020
  • ...d on [[physical examination]] by inability to full extend the elbow. The [[sensitivity and specificity]] is 92% and 61%.<ref name="pmid18324503">{{cite journal |author=Lamprakis
    1 KB (189 words) - 21:49, 25 February 2010
  • The digiti quinti signa may be more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] than the pronator drift test.<ref name="pmid20799429">{{cite jo
    1 KB (167 words) - 09:01, 19 November 2011
  • Sigmoidoscopy has a [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of 31% in detecting pseudomembranes as compared to [[colonoso
    2 KB (305 words) - 07:42, 19 August 2011
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
    9 KB (1,188 words) - 11:45, 2 February 2023
  • ...w.nlm.nih.gov/cgi/mesh/2007/MB_cgi?term=Sensitivity+and+Specificity |title=Sensitivity and specificity |accessdate=2007-12-09 |author=National Library of Mediicne |authorlink= |c Successful application of sensitivity and specificity is an important part of practicing [[evidence-based medicine]].
    18 KB (2,610 words) - 05:45, 15 March 2024
  • In adults, albuminuria is a more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] than total protein in detecting [[chronic kidney disease]] from
    2 KB (351 words) - 23:56, 10 August 2011
  • * [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity ]] 98.5% * [[sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 98.0%
    9 KB (1,197 words) - 15:44, 6 September 2014
  • ...or [[ligament]], usually of the [[anterior cruciate ligament]] with high [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]].<ref name="pmid2356496">{{cite journal |author=Hardaker WT, ...nation (McMurray's, Apley's, and joint line tenderness) is more than 70% [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] for meniscal injuries.<ref name="pmid17939613">{{cite journal |
    5 KB (694 words) - 23:11, 9 January 2014
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 97.2% (95% [[Confidence interval|CI]], 96.2% to 98.0%) * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 87.4% ([[Confidence interval|CI]], 84.5% to 89.8%)
    9 KB (1,111 words) - 11:34, 2 April 2010
  • ! Finding!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]
    8 KB (1,156 words) - 17:15, 18 December 2013
  • ...n]] is probably over 3 ([[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]]=80%; [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]=76%). Presumably this is related to the viscosity of the [[in
    7 KB (894 words) - 11:18, 29 December 2010
  • Regarding blood tests, the [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of tests among 73 patients were:<ref name="pmid17071206"/>
    6 KB (743 words) - 11:50, 8 November 2010
  • 11 KB (1,523 words) - 12:08, 12 May 2015
  • ...ore specifically, [[enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay]]) tend to be more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]].<ref name="pmid15096330">{{cite journal |author=Stein PD, Hull ! &nbsp; !! [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]]!! [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]
    9 KB (1,251 words) - 13:11, 11 May 2013
View (previous 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)