Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- 251 bytes (32 words) - 16:52, 15 April 2009
- ...w.nlm.nih.gov/cgi/mesh/2007/MB_cgi?term=Sensitivity+and+Specificity |title=Sensitivity and specificity |accessdate=2007-12-09 |author=National Library of Mediicne |authorlink= |c Successful application of sensitivity and specificity is an important part of practicing [[evidence-based medicine]].18 KB (2,610 words) - 05:45, 15 March 2024
- | pagename = Sensitivity and specificity | abc = Sensitivity and specificity1 KB (100 words) - 05:47, 15 March 2024
- 12 bytes (1 word) - 15:45, 23 December 2007
- 139 bytes (16 words) - 16:44, 14 May 2010
- 869 bytes (139 words) - 17:06, 5 June 2008
Page text matches
- #redirect [[sensitivity and specificity]]41 bytes (4 words) - 10:50, 7 March 2008
- #redirect [[sensitivity and specificity]]41 bytes (4 words) - 10:50, 7 March 2008
- #redirect [[Sensitivity and specificity]]41 bytes (4 words) - 07:05, 9 December 2007
- #redirect [[Sensitivity and specificity]]41 bytes (4 words) - 07:05, 9 December 2007
- #REDIRECT [[sensitivity and specificity]]41 bytes (4 words) - 11:10, 2 December 2008
- #redirect [[Sensitivity and specificity]]41 bytes (4 words) - 04:15, 7 March 2008
- #redirect [[Sensitivity and specificity]]41 bytes (4 words) - 04:16, 7 March 2008
- | pagename = Sensitivity and specificity | abc = Sensitivity and specificity1 KB (100 words) - 05:47, 15 March 2024
- A structured physical examination of an injured ankle that, with high [[sensitivity and specificity]], will determine if any bones of the ankle or lower leg are broken203 bytes (30 words) - 00:41, 4 October 2008
- * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 100% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 74%1 KB (197 words) - 10:20, 19 July 2010
- ...pulation and the study population, which leads to an overestimation of the sensitivity and specificity of a test.220 bytes (31 words) - 20:08, 8 September 2009
- ...fter passive leg raising!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]2 KB (217 words) - 09:05, 6 October 2010
- 4 KB (525 words) - 07:42, 4 May 2024
- A structured physical examination of an injured ankle that, with high [[sensitivity and specificity]], will determine if any bones of the ankle or lower leg are broken. By usi382 bytes (57 words) - 17:55, 11 June 2010
- ...=1980 |pmid=6446157 |doi=}}</ref> However, in one study this reduces the [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of the test from 67% to 41%.<ref name="pmid17601462">{{cite j ...">{{cite journal |author=Majlesi J, Togay H, Unalan H, Toprak S |title=The sensitivity and specificity of the Slump and the Straight Leg Raising tests in patients with lumbar dis6 KB (798 words) - 02:53, 15 June 2010
- 3 KB (367 words) - 11:15, 10 August 2010
- {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}344 bytes (43 words) - 17:04, 14 July 2008
- * Total lymphocyte count of more than 2000 has [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] or 95% * Total lymphocyte count of less than 1200 has [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 95%2 KB (309 words) - 22:03, 3 June 2011
- ...ef name="pmid12559279">{{cite journal| author=Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG| title=Sensitivity and specificity of commonly available bladder tumor markers versus cytology: results of a c2 KB (244 words) - 11:11, 2 September 2011
- ...h have a [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] over 90% but have a [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of less than 70%.<ref name="pmid19586584"/><ref name="pmid1773 KB (397 words) - 13:33, 15 June 2012
- {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}485 bytes (59 words) - 05:16, 27 June 2009
- {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}497 bytes (62 words) - 19:55, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}499 bytes (64 words) - 20:32, 11 January 2010
- The likelihood ratio is an alternative to [[sensitivity and specificity]] for the numeric interpretation of [[diagnostic test]]s. In a [[randomized Likelihood ratios are related to [[sensitivity and specificity]].5 KB (738 words) - 20:35, 15 August 2012
- {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}643 bytes (79 words) - 18:05, 11 January 2010
- ! !![[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]!![[Sensitivity8 KB (1,026 words) - 12:49, 10 February 2011
- ...ction with a pooled [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of 0.97, [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 0.96."<ref name="pmid17636770">{{cite journal |author=Abba3 KB (452 words) - 21:58, 22 February 2009
- * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]: 60%<ref name="pmid2187961"/>, 64%<ref name="pmid8309266">{{c * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]: 70%<ref name="pmid2187961"/>6 KB (890 words) - 16:47, 13 May 2023
- ! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]3 KB (418 words) - 13:21, 15 February 2009
- * [[Sensitivity and specificity| sensitivity]] = 92% * [[Sensitivity and specificity| specificity]] is uncertain and ranges from 88 to 96%8 KB (1,056 words) - 13:29, 10 February 2023
- ====Sensitivity and specificity====4 KB (610 words) - 23:42, 24 May 2012
- {{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}881 bytes (140 words) - 23:40, 24 April 2010
- On [[physical examination]], the most [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] findings are:<ref name="pmid20229121">{{cite journal| author=Ch1 KB (145 words) - 09:18, 18 August 2011
- ...theterization reported a [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] and [[Sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 88% and 56%, respectively. <ref name="pmid23227919">{{cite4 KB (597 words) - 08:16, 6 September 2013
- ...d a [[sensitivity and specificity|negative predictive value]] of 74% and [[sensitivity and specificity|negative predictive value]] of 3% ([http://medinformatics.uthscsa.edu/calcu9 KB (1,280 words) - 11:44, 2 February 2023
- * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 24% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 55%4 KB (561 words) - 17:16, 13 June 2010
- ** [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 83% ** [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 96%6 KB (818 words) - 12:51, 8 September 2020
- ...d on [[physical examination]] by inability to full extend the elbow. The [[sensitivity and specificity]] is 92% and 61%.<ref name="pmid18324503">{{cite journal |author=Lamprakis1 KB (189 words) - 21:49, 25 February 2010
- The digiti quinti signa may be more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] than the pronator drift test.<ref name="pmid20799429">{{cite jo1 KB (167 words) - 09:01, 19 November 2011
- Sigmoidoscopy has a [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of 31% in detecting pseudomembranes as compared to [[colonoso2 KB (305 words) - 07:42, 19 August 2011
- * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]9 KB (1,188 words) - 11:45, 2 February 2023
- ...w.nlm.nih.gov/cgi/mesh/2007/MB_cgi?term=Sensitivity+and+Specificity |title=Sensitivity and specificity |accessdate=2007-12-09 |author=National Library of Mediicne |authorlink= |c Successful application of sensitivity and specificity is an important part of practicing [[evidence-based medicine]].18 KB (2,610 words) - 05:45, 15 March 2024
- In adults, albuminuria is a more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] than total protein in detecting [[chronic kidney disease]] from2 KB (351 words) - 23:56, 10 August 2011
- * [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity ]] 98.5% * [[sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 98.0%9 KB (1,197 words) - 15:44, 6 September 2014
- ...or [[ligament]], usually of the [[anterior cruciate ligament]] with high [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]].<ref name="pmid2356496">{{cite journal |author=Hardaker WT, ...nation (McMurray's, Apley's, and joint line tenderness) is more than 70% [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] for meniscal injuries.<ref name="pmid17939613">{{cite journal |5 KB (694 words) - 23:11, 9 January 2014
- * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 97.2% (95% [[Confidence interval|CI]], 96.2% to 98.0%) * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 87.4% ([[Confidence interval|CI]], 84.5% to 89.8%)9 KB (1,111 words) - 11:34, 2 April 2010
- ...ive]] might merit a set of subarticles or some collective treatment like [[Sensitivity and specificity]]. [[Cerebral angiography]] is certainly related, and at the cellular level2 KB (290 words) - 19:49, 29 November 2010
- ! Finding!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]8 KB (1,156 words) - 17:15, 18 December 2013
- ...n]] is probably over 3 ([[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]]=80%; [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]=76%). Presumably this is related to the viscosity of the [[in7 KB (894 words) - 11:18, 29 December 2010
- Regarding blood tests, the [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of tests among 73 patients were:<ref name="pmid17071206"/>6 KB (743 words) - 11:50, 8 November 2010