Talk:Homeopathy/Archive 16: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce
(: It's too bad, BUT....)
imported>D. Matt Innis
(: I know, I know)
Line 19: Line 19:
I have to admit I am a little disappointed.  I was looking forward to seeing if we could keep things under control while we sought to improve this (and any) article.  But, I do agree we probably don't have enough resources if things fall apart. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 03:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
I have to admit I am a little disappointed.  I was looking forward to seeing if we could keep things under control while we sought to improve this (and any) article.  But, I do agree we probably don't have enough resources if things fall apart. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 03:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
:As I said repeatedly at the EC discussions, I was against removing the moratorium purely for practical reasons rather than philosophical reasons -- we simply don't have enough Editors available to keep this article going if it ran into the same disputes that tied us all in knots for *years* while it was being edited. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 03:37, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
:As I said repeatedly at the EC discussions, I was against removing the moratorium purely for practical reasons rather than philosophical reasons -- we simply don't have enough Editors available to keep this article going if it ran into the same disputes that tied us all in knots for *years* while it was being edited. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 03:37, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
::Yeah, deep down I know you're right.  But I can't help but wonder how it will be any easier when we have more resources/contributers.  It's sort of like that SOPA thing... [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 04:27, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:27, 19 January 2012

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
Video [?]
Signed Articles [?]
 


I protest the fact that this article has not been approved by any homeopath. What is the idea in not allowing an expert in the field approve an article (since that was what Citizendium was created for in the first place)?—Ramanand Jhingade 13:29, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

It seems to me that some discussion should be provided of reputable views of homeopathy. For example, Dr. Weil who says: "Dr. Weil feels that homeopathy has value, even if it merely evokes a placebo response. If that response does indeed heal then it has great value - in other words, rather than discounting the placebo response, physicians should exploit it as a safe, effective way to treat disease." John R. Brews 15:53, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
If I had known that Andrew Weil, a classmate of mine at Harvard '63, was going to turn into the semi-charlatan that he is, I would have kicked his ass into the Charles River. It was only recently, by the way, that I learned that it was *he* who ratted on Leary and Albert to the administration -- mainly because they weren't including him in their little LSD parties.... Hayford Peirce 01:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

I have to admit I am a little disappointed. I was looking forward to seeing if we could keep things under control while we sought to improve this (and any) article. But, I do agree we probably don't have enough resources if things fall apart. D. Matt Innis 03:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

As I said repeatedly at the EC discussions, I was against removing the moratorium purely for practical reasons rather than philosophical reasons -- we simply don't have enough Editors available to keep this article going if it ran into the same disputes that tied us all in knots for *years* while it was being edited. Hayford Peirce 03:37, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, deep down I know you're right. But I can't help but wonder how it will be any easier when we have more resources/contributers. It's sort of like that SOPA thing... D. Matt Innis 04:27, 20 January 2012 (UTC)