Archive:Approval and Feedback: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>J. Noel Chiappa (We definitely need a more efficent approval system (and not just the mechanical details)) |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* [[User:Jaime Nubiola|Jaime Nubiola]] | * [[User:Jaime Nubiola|Jaime Nubiola]] | ||
* [[User:Roger Lohmann|Roger Lohmann]] | * [[User:Roger Lohmann|Roger Lohmann]] | ||
* [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa ]] | * [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] | ||
* (add your name if seriously interested, i.e., if you're interested in doing real work for the initiative) | * (add your name if seriously interested, i.e., if you're interested in doing real work for the initiative) | ||
==Problems with current ( | ==Mailing list== | ||
The mailing list for the Approval and Feedback group, acting as a subcommittee of the Editorial Council and with authority to approve A&F proposals, is [http://mail.citizendium.org/mailman/listinfo/cz-approfeed cz-approfeed.] The list archives are open to read, but only specifically listed members of the A&F group can subscribe. | |||
==Problems with current (March 2008) article approval system== | |||
*Rate of approval too slow | *Rate of approval too slow | ||
*Too much confusion about what the process is | *Too much confusion about what the process is | ||
Revision as of 18:38, 25 March 2008
This is the future home of an Approval and Feedback Initiative: it's all about recognizing excellence.
Personnel
Persons interested in taking an active role in developing and managing this initiative (please add your name if you're seriously interested):
- Larry Sanger
- D. Matt Innis
- David Shapinsky
- Carl Hewitt
- Martin Baldwin-Edwards
- Supten Sarbadhikari
- Anthony.Sebastian
- David E. Volk
- Jaime Nubiola
- Roger Lohmann
- J. Noel Chiappa
- (add your name if seriously interested, i.e., if you're interested in doing real work for the initiative)
Mailing list
The mailing list for the Approval and Feedback group, acting as a subcommittee of the Editorial Council and with authority to approve A&F proposals, is cz-approfeed. The list archives are open to read, but only specifically listed members of the A&F group can subscribe.
Problems with current (March 2008) article approval system
- Rate of approval too slow
- Too much confusion about what the process is
- No simple, prominently-placed version of instructions
- No easy way to get the word out to specific sets of editors that we want reviews
- No set way for editors to simply *review* an article and thereby enumerate what an article needs in order to be approvable