Search results

====Sensitivity and specificity====

{{r|Sensitivity and specificity}}

On [[physical examination]], the most [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] findings are:<ref name="pmid20229121">{{cite journal| author=Ch

...theterization reported a [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] and [[Sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 88% and 56%, respectively. <ref name="pmid23227919">{{cite

...d a [[sensitivity and specificity|negative predictive value]] of 74% and [[sensitivity and specificity|negative predictive value]] of 3% ([http://medinformatics.uthscsa.edu/calcu

* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 24% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 55%

** [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 83% ** [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 96%

...d on [[physical examination]] by inability to full extend the elbow. The [[sensitivity and specificity]] is 92% and 61%.<ref name="pmid18324503">{{cite journal |author=Lamprakis

The digiti quinti signa may be more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] than the pronator drift test.<ref name="pmid20799429">{{cite jo

Sigmoidoscopy has a [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of 31% in detecting pseudomembranes as compared to [[colonoso

* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

...w.nlm.nih.gov/cgi/mesh/2007/MB_cgi?term=Sensitivity+and+Specificity |title=Sensitivity and specificity |accessdate=2007-12-09 |author=National Library of Mediicne |authorlink= |c Successful application of sensitivity and specificity is an important part of practicing [[evidence-based medicine]].

* [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity ]] 98.5% * [[sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 98.0%

In adults, albuminuria is a more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] than total protein in detecting [[chronic kidney disease]] from

...or [[ligament]], usually of the [[anterior cruciate ligament]] with high [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]].<ref name="pmid2356496">{{cite journal |author=Hardaker WT, ...nation (McMurray's, Apley's, and joint line tenderness) is more than 70% [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] for meniscal injuries.<ref name="pmid17939613">{{cite journal |

* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 97.2% (95% [[Confidence interval|CI]], 96.2% to 98.0%) * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 87.4% ([[Confidence interval|CI]], 84.5% to 89.8%)

...ive]] might merit a set of subarticles or some collective treatment like [[Sensitivity and specificity]]. [[Cerebral angiography]] is certainly related, and at the cellular level

! Finding!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

...n]] is probably over 3 ([[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]]=80%; [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]=76%). Presumably this is related to the viscosity of the [[in

Regarding blood tests, the [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of tests among 73 patients were:<ref name="pmid17071206"/>