User:Roger A. Lohmann/sandbox

From Citizendium
< User:Roger A. Lohmann
Revision as of 19:30, 7 June 2009 by imported>Roger A. Lohmann (→‎Dewey and Lippman on Publics)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

"When there isn't anything else fun to do, I go outside and play in my sandbox."

Anon. (Age 8)


(These sections are being written for addition to the Public article I've been working on.)

Dewey and Lippman on Publics

Walter Lippmann (1889-1974) was a working journalist and political commentator who exercised a powerful influence on twentieth century views of the public. Along with Herbert Croly and Walter Weyl, Lippman was a Progressive, one of the founding editors of The New Republic and a highly influential force in American journalism during the first half of the twentieth century. Among other notable contributions, Lippman popularized use of the term "stereotype" which in his definition referred to "the pictures in our heads". In addition to his role as a journalist, Lippman was an a WASP elitist who also served as an informal advisor to a number of U.S. presidents from Woodrow Wilson through Lyndon Johnson.

In Public Opinion (1922) Lippmann offered his fullest statement of the role of newspapers in modern representative democracy, the public and a passive, information-processing view of public opinion formation. Lippmann argued that modern industrial democracies were too complex for average citizens to effectively understand and direct. Government must be largely carried out by an expert-based governing class. He saw the accuracy of news and the protection of journalistic sources as the principal problem of democracy and presented the public largely in Platonic terms as a bewildered and rather passive herd. In modern, industrial society, according to Lippmann, it was the job of the journalist to translate the actions and motives of the "governing class" of bureaucratic experts and specialists into terms that the general public could comprehend. He found the notion of actual government by the people (as opposed to their better-informed representatives) altogether implausible. Three years later, in The Phantom Public (1925), his view reached what proved to be for him its outer limit when Lippmann recognized that members of the governing class of experts could themselves be outsiders to any particular problem. Apart from the few who understood any particular issue, even other experts were not possessed of sufficient accurate information to be capable of effective action. (Lippmann may have been influenced in this view, some authorities believe, by the views of European Facists who were already in power in Italy and gaining strength elsewhere in Europe at the time or by advocates of technocracy.) Lippmann’s view is that public affairs are largely the responsibility of elected representatives and appointed officials who are expert elites. Many other progressives expressed similar views, including Woodrow Wilson, Herbert Croly and Mary Parker Follett's early (1896) study of the U.S. House of Representatives. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; refs with no name must have content

Two years later, in The Public and its Problems, [1] John Dewey, perhaps the best-known American philosopher and public intellectual of the first half of the twentieth century, offered a response to Lippmann’s defense of representative democracy. In contrast to Lippman's expert model of representative democracy, Dewey argued that politics is the responsibility of all citizens, and that adequate education would provide citizens with the knowledge needed to be involved in politics. In the Dewey model, there was a place for ordinary citizens along side elites, and experts in government, and journalism assumed an educational role. Dewey also worked out the implications of expertise for the public as well as leaders: In reply to Lippman's implied (and debilitating) division of labor among experts, he posited multiple publics with specialized and focused interests paralleling those of the experts. Decades later, the political researcher and theorist Robert Dahl in a study of New Haven politics detailed similar public dynamics between experts, elites and interested publics and numerous other political studies have detailed focused publics as "constituencies" of public bureaucracies. At the same time David Easton and other political systems theorists theorized feedback loop ( notably "#public opinion") back to the experts and leaders, and Lazarsfeld and Katz identified a "two-step flow" of communication in which #public opinion formation was mediated by an even more complex division of labor involving not only experts and publics but also "opinion leaders" whose greater expertise and knowledge is recognized by other members of the public who take their cues

The following paragraphs were taken directly from Wikipedia and need to be corrected and rewritten):

Dewey also revisioned journalism to fit this model by taking the focus from actions or happenings and changing the structure to focus on choices, consequences, and conditions, in order to foster conversation and improve the generation of knowledge in the community. Journalism would not just produce a static product that told of what had already happened, but the news would be in a constant state of evolution as the community added value by generating knowledge. The audience would disappear, to be replaced by citizens and collaborators who would essentially be users, doing more with the news than simply reading it.

Dewey’s journalism was revolutionary because it changed the structure from choosing a winner of a given situation to posing alternatives and exploring consequences. His effort to change journalism, involve citizens, stimulation, was all under the auspices of creating the Great Community he wrote of in The Public and its Problems: “Till the Great Society is converted in to a Great Community, the Public will remain in eclipse. Communication can alone create a great community” (Dewey, pg. 144).

Dewey believed that communication creates a great community, and citizens who actively participate in public life contribute to that community. "The clear consciousness of a communal life, in all its implications, constitutes the idea of democracy." (The Public and its Problems, p. 149). This Great Community can only occur with "free and full intercommunication." (p. 211) Communication can be understood as journalism - the traditional forum in which people communicate.

Article Ideas, Fragments, etc

Title Composer/Librettist Location Main Characters Date
First Produced
Date
Movie
Oklahoma Oklahoma Territory Curley McLain, Laurey Williams 1941 1943
State Fair Iowa State Fair 1948 1948 1948
Annie Get Your Gun Annie Oakley 1900 1900
Meet Me In St. Louis 1900 1900
South Pacific WWII in Pacific 1900 1900
Wonderful Town NYC 1900 1900
New York, New York 1900 1900
Phantom of the Opera Andrew Lloyd Webber Paris Opera, Paris Sewer 1941 1943
Aspects of Love Andrew Lloyd Webber 1948 1948 1948
Cats Andrew Lloyd Webber 1900 1900
Evita Andrew Lloyd Webber Argentina 1900
West Side Story Leonard Bernstein 1900 1900
The Sound of Music Austria 1900 1900
My Fair Lady Edwardian London 1900 }
Private Lives Noel Coward 1900 }
Kiss Me Kate 1900 }
The King and I Siam 1900 }
Pal Joey 1900 }
Guys and Dolls Broadway 1900 }
London Calling Noel Coward London Willy & George Craft 1923 }
Kiss Me Kate }
[[ ]] }
A Chorus Line }
Hair }
No No Nanette }
Jesus Christ, Superstar }
Starlight Express }
Follies }
[[ ]] }
[[ ]] }

Catalog of Art Nouveau organizations

Organization Founder City Year Media ???
Art Furniture Alliance
Bonn
[[ ]]
[[ ]]
[[ ]]
[[ ]]
[[ ]]
[[ ]]
[[ ]]
[[ ]]
}
}
}
[[ ]]
[[ ]]

References

  1. John Dewey. The Public and Its Problems. New York: Holt. 1927

(No workgroup is going to want to claim this!)