Quantization: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
No edit summary
imported>Paul Wormer
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[physics]], '''quantization''', in its original meaning, refers to the fact that the [[energy]] of many [[physical system]]s is not continuous, but discrete—''quantized''. The size of the discrete energy "parcels" is determined by  [[Planck's constant]] ''h''. This  natural constant (''h'' &asymp; 6.626 ×10<sup>&minus;34</sup> Js), is so small that on a macroscopic scale (energies on the order of joules, time intervals on the order of seconds), quantization is a minute effect that can hardly be observed. For all intents and purposes, macroscopic energies are continuous.  
{{subpages}}
In [[physics]], the term '''quantization''' refers to the [[energy]] of [[physical system]]s being discontinuous—''quantized''. The size of discrete energy steps is determined by  [[Planck's constant]] ''h''. This  natural constant is so small  (''h'' &asymp; 6.626 ×10<sup>&minus;34</sup> Js) that on a macroscopic scale (energies on the order of joules, time intervals on the order of seconds), quantization is a minute effect that can hardly be observed. For all intents and purposes, macroscopic energies are continuous. However, for microscopic systems, such as [[electron]]s orbiting a [[nucleus (atom)|nucleus]],  quantization is  important.


Energy quantization was first introduced in 1900 by [[Max Planck]] in his theory of [[black-body radiation]],<ref>M. Planck, ''Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteiling im Normalspectrum'' [On the energy distribution law in the normal spectrum], Annalen der Physik, vol. '''4''', pp. 553-563 (1901) [http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k15314w.image.r=Annalen+der+Physic.f635.langFR Online]. First presented on December 14, 1900 for the Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft.</ref> when he assumed that the walls of a blackbody consist of [[Harmonic oscillator (quantum)|harmonic oscillators]] and that the energies of these oscillators are discrete. He was forced to introduce this assumption in his explanation of the experimentally observed deviations from [[Wien's distribution law]]. Planck did not quantize the black-body radiation itself. [[Electromagnetic radiation]] was quantized five years later by [[Albert Einstein]],<ref>A. Einstein, ''Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt'' [On a heuristic point view regarding the creation and conversion of light], Annalen der Physik, vol. '''17''', pp. 132 - 148,  
Energy quantization was first introduced in 1900 by [[Max Planck]] in his theory of [[black-body radiation]],<ref>M. Planck, ''Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteiling im Normalspectrum'' [On the energy distribution law in the normal spectrum], Annalen der Physik, vol. '''4''', pp. 553-563 (1901) [http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k15314w.image.r=Annalen+der+Physic.f635.langFR Online]. First presented on December 14, 1900 for the Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft.</ref> when he assumed that the walls of a blackbody consist of [[Harmonic oscillator (quantum)|harmonic oscillators]] and that the energies of these oscillators are discrete, i.e., quantized. He was forced to introduce this assumption in his explanation of the experimentally observed deviations from [[Wien's distribution law]]. Planck did not quantize the black-body radiation—a form of [[electromagnetic radiation]], this was done  by [[Albert Einstein]] five years later,<ref>A. Einstein, ''Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt'' [On a heuristic point view regarding the creation and conversion of light], Annalen der Physik, vol. '''17''', pp. 132 - 148,  
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/andp.19053220607  online]. </ref> who postulated that the electromagnetic field consists of light quanta (energy parcels, that were later called [[photon]]s). Einstein's energy parcels are of size ''h&nu;'', where &nu; is the [[frequency]] of the [[electromagnetic wave]]s. In 1923 [[Louis de Broglie]]<ref>L. de Broglie, ''Waves and Quanta'',  Nature, vol. 112, October 13, 1923, p. 540 [http://www.nature.com/physics/looking-back/debroglie/index.html Online]</ref> announced  that the  [[Energy_(science)#Equivalence_of_energy_and_mass|relativistic kinetic energy]] of  material particles is also quantized and he derived the consequence that the motion of material particles is wave-like. The very small value of ''h'' explains why the wavelike nature of matter is very difficult to demonstrate on a macroscopic scale.  The work of de Broglie inspired [[Erwin Schrödinger]] to postulate a wave equation that describes the motion of very light material particles, such as [[electron]]s.<ref> E. Schrödinger, ''Quantisierung als Eigenwerproblem'' [quantization as eigenvalue problem]  Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge, Band 79, p. 361 (1926)
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/andp.19053220607  online]. </ref> who postulated that the electromagnetic field consists of light quanta (energy parcels, that were later called [[photon]]s). Einstein's energy parcels are of size ''h&nu;'', where &nu; is the [[frequency]] of the [[electromagnetic wave]]s. In 1923 [[Louis de Broglie]]<ref>L. de Broglie, ''Waves and Quanta'',  Nature, vol. 112, October 13, 1923, p. 540 [http://www.nature.com/physics/looking-back/debroglie/index.html Online]</ref> announced  that the  [[Energy_(science)#Equivalence_of_energy_and_mass|relativistic kinetic energy]] of  material particles is also quantized and he derived the consequence that the motion of material particles is wave-like. The very small value of ''h'' explains why the wavelike nature of matter is very difficult to demonstrate on a macroscopic scale.  The work of de Broglie inspired [[Erwin Schrödinger]] to postulate a wave equation<ref> E. Schrödinger, ''Quantisierung als Eigenwerproblem'' [quantization as eigenvalue problem]  Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge, Band 79, p. 361 (1926)
[http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k153811.pleinepage.r=Annalen+der+Physic.f373.langEN Online]
[http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k153811.pleinepage.r=Annalen+der+Physic.f373.langEN Online]
</ref> When [[Schrödinger equation|Schrödinger's wave equation]] is solved with appropriate boundary conditions, energy quantization follows automatically for ''bound systems'' (not for unbound systems where particles come and go to and from infinity). In Schrödinger's theory certain operators play a role that correspond to classical—electromagnetic or mechanical—properties.
</ref> that describes the motion of very light material particles, such as [[electron]]s. When [[Schrödinger equation|Schrödinger's wave equation]] is solved with appropriate boundary conditions, energy quantization follows automatically for ''bound systems'' (not for unbound systems where particles come and go to and from infinity). In Schrödinger's theory certain operators play a role that correspond to classical—electromagnetic or mechanical—properties.


==Quantization rules==
==Quantization rules==
In the second meaning of the word '''quantization''', it refers to the replacement of classical equations for classical quantities, by quantum mechanical equations for quantum mechanical objects.
In a second meaning of the word, '''quantization''' refers to the replacement of classical quantities by  quantum mechanical operators.  In general, two kinds of operators are distinguished:
# Those corresponding to dynamic variables; they are [[self-adjoint|Hermitian]] and referred to as ''observables''.
# Those corresponding to transformations of the system ([[rotation]]s and [[translation]]s); they are [[unitary]].
The process of quantization only applies to operators of the first kind, i.e., to observables. A classical dynamic quantity <font style="vertical-align: text-top;"><math>\mathcal{A}</math></font> (defined in classical mechanics or electromagnetism) has a quantum mechanical counterpart, an observable (Hermitian operator) ''A''. To construct the latter, we consider a single particle without spin subject to a scalar potential. Classically the quantity is a function of its [[momentum]] '''p''', its position vector '''r''', and the time ''t'',  <math>\mathcal{A}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{p},t)</math>. With '''r''' = (''x'', ''y'', ''z'') is associated the observable '''R''' and with '''p''' = (''p''<sub>''x''</sub>, ''p''<sub>''y''</sub>, ''p''<sub>''z''</sub>) the observable '''P'''. The two operators satisfy the commutation relations
:<math>
\begin{align}
\left[ R_i, R_j\right] &\equiv  R_i\,R_j - R_j\,R_i = 0 \\
\left[ P_i, P_j\right] & = 0 \\
\left[ R_i, P_j\right] & = i\hbar \delta_{ij},
\end{align}
</math>
where ℏ is [[Planck's constant]]  and &delta;<sub>''ij''</sub> is the [[Kronecker delta]].
To obtain the observable ''A'' one could replace in the expression for <math>\mathcal{A}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{p},t)</math> the variables '''r''' and '''p''' by the observables '''R''' and '''P''',
:<math>
\mathcal{A}(\mathbf{r}, \mathbf{p},t) \Longrightarrow A(t) =  \mathcal{A}(\mathbf{R}, \mathbf{P},t)
</math>
However, this mode of action would be, in general, ambiguous. For instance,  in classical mechanics the [[inner product]] '''p'''&sdot;'''r''' is equal to '''r'''&sdot;'''p''', but simple replacement in the two forms gives two operator forms that are not equal, because
:<math>
\mathbf{P}\cdot \mathbf{R} \ne \mathbf{R}\cdot \mathbf{P}.
</math>
Moreover, neither of these two operator expressions is Hermitian.  Hence to the replacement rule must be added a symmetrization rule, which classically is allowed and usually trivial.  For example, the observable associated with '''p'''&sdot;'''r''' is obtained by first symmetrizing the classical expression, and then making the replacement
:<math>
\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{r} = \frac{1}{2}(\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{r}  + \mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{p} )
\Longrightarrow \frac{1}{2}(\mathbf{P}\cdot \mathbf{R}  + \mathbf{R}\cdot \mathbf{P} )
</math>
which is indeed Hermitian. In systems consisting of more than one particle, the coordinates and momenta of one particle at the time are replaced and this is done for all particles consecutively.
 
''Remarks:''
# There exist quantum physical quantities which have no classical equivalent and which are defined directly as an observable (this is the case for particle [[spin]]).
# The procedure just sketched applies only to quantities in [[Cartesian coordinates]]. For other coordinate systems, such as [[spherical polar coordinate]]s the procedure must be generalized.
===Example===
Consider the [[Hamiltonian]] (energy) of a spinless particle of [[charge]] ''q'' and [[mass]] ''m'' placed in an [[electric field]] derived from a scalar potential ''U''('''r'''). The [[potential energy]] of the particle is therefore ''V''('''r''') = ''qU''('''r'''). The kinetic energy is &frac12;''m'' '''v'''<sup>2</sup> =
'''p'''<sup>2</sup>/(2''m''), because '''p'''&equiv; ''m'' '''v'''. The classical Hamiltonian
is time-independent,
:<math>
\mathcal{H}(\mathbf{r}, \mathbf{p}) = \frac{\mathbf{p}^2}{2m} + V(\mathbf{r})\quad
\hbox{with}\quad \mathbf{p}^2 \equiv \mathbf{p}\cdot\mathbf{p}.
</math>
This example is simple, no symmetrization is necessary, since neither '''P'''<sup>2</sup> nor ''V''('''R''') involves products of non-commuting operators. Therefore:
:<math>
\mathcal{H}(\mathbf{r}, \mathbf{p}) \Longrightarrow H = \frac{\mathbf{P}^2}{2m} + V(\mathbf{R}).
</math>
==X-representation==
[[Quantum mechanics]] is  often formulated in the so-called ''X''-representation in which [[wave function]]s &Psi; of ''N''-particle systems are functions of the position vectors of the ''N'' particles,
:<math>
\Psi(\mathbf{R}_1, \mathbf{R}_2,\ldots, \mathbf{R}_N).
</math>
In the ''X''-representation the observables '''R'''<sub>''k''</sub> act pointwise (are multiplicative operators) and the momentum operators '''P'''<sub>''k''</sub> are given by differential operators
:<math>
\mathbf{P}_k = -i\hbar \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial X_k}, \; \frac{\partial}{\partial Y_k}, \;\frac{\partial}{\partial Z_k} \right), \quad k=1,2, \ldots, N.
</math>
The one-particle kinetic energy operator is
:<math>
\frac{\mathbf{P}^2}{2m} =  - \frac{1}{2m} \left( \frac{\partial^2}{\partial X^2} +
\frac{\partial^2}{\partial Y^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial Z^2} \right)
</math>





Revision as of 10:13, 29 November 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

In physics, the term quantization refers to the energy of physical systems being discontinuous—quantized. The size of discrete energy steps is determined by Planck's constant h. This natural constant is so small (h ≈ 6.626 ×10−34 Js) that on a macroscopic scale (energies on the order of joules, time intervals on the order of seconds), quantization is a minute effect that can hardly be observed. For all intents and purposes, macroscopic energies are continuous. However, for microscopic systems, such as electrons orbiting a nucleus, quantization is important.

Energy quantization was first introduced in 1900 by Max Planck in his theory of black-body radiation,[1] when he assumed that the walls of a blackbody consist of harmonic oscillators and that the energies of these oscillators are discrete, i.e., quantized. He was forced to introduce this assumption in his explanation of the experimentally observed deviations from Wien's distribution law. Planck did not quantize the black-body radiation—a form of electromagnetic radiation, this was done by Albert Einstein five years later,[2] who postulated that the electromagnetic field consists of light quanta (energy parcels, that were later called photons). Einstein's energy parcels are of size , where ν is the frequency of the electromagnetic waves. In 1923 Louis de Broglie[3] announced that the relativistic kinetic energy of material particles is also quantized and he derived the consequence that the motion of material particles is wave-like. The very small value of h explains why the wavelike nature of matter is very difficult to demonstrate on a macroscopic scale. The work of de Broglie inspired Erwin Schrödinger to postulate a wave equation[4] that describes the motion of very light material particles, such as electrons. When Schrödinger's wave equation is solved with appropriate boundary conditions, energy quantization follows automatically for bound systems (not for unbound systems where particles come and go to and from infinity). In Schrödinger's theory certain operators play a role that correspond to classical—electromagnetic or mechanical—properties.

Quantization rules

In a second meaning of the word, quantization refers to the replacement of classical quantities by quantum mechanical operators. In general, two kinds of operators are distinguished:

  1. Those corresponding to dynamic variables; they are Hermitian and referred to as observables.
  2. Those corresponding to transformations of the system (rotations and translations); they are unitary.

The process of quantization only applies to operators of the first kind, i.e., to observables. A classical dynamic quantity (defined in classical mechanics or electromagnetism) has a quantum mechanical counterpart, an observable (Hermitian operator) A. To construct the latter, we consider a single particle without spin subject to a scalar potential. Classically the quantity is a function of its momentum p, its position vector r, and the time t, . With r = (x, y, z) is associated the observable R and with p = (px, py, pz) the observable P. The two operators satisfy the commutation relations

where ℏ is Planck's constant and δij is the Kronecker delta. To obtain the observable A one could replace in the expression for the variables r and p by the observables R and P,

However, this mode of action would be, in general, ambiguous. For instance, in classical mechanics the inner product pr is equal to rp, but simple replacement in the two forms gives two operator forms that are not equal, because

Moreover, neither of these two operator expressions is Hermitian. Hence to the replacement rule must be added a symmetrization rule, which classically is allowed and usually trivial. For example, the observable associated with pr is obtained by first symmetrizing the classical expression, and then making the replacement

which is indeed Hermitian. In systems consisting of more than one particle, the coordinates and momenta of one particle at the time are replaced and this is done for all particles consecutively.

Remarks:

  1. There exist quantum physical quantities which have no classical equivalent and which are defined directly as an observable (this is the case for particle spin).
  2. The procedure just sketched applies only to quantities in Cartesian coordinates. For other coordinate systems, such as spherical polar coordinates the procedure must be generalized.

Example

Consider the Hamiltonian (energy) of a spinless particle of charge q and mass m placed in an electric field derived from a scalar potential U(r). The potential energy of the particle is therefore V(r) = qU(r). The kinetic energy is ½m v2 = p2/(2m), because pm v. The classical Hamiltonian is time-independent,

This example is simple, no symmetrization is necessary, since neither P2 nor V(R) involves products of non-commuting operators. Therefore:

X-representation

Quantum mechanics is often formulated in the so-called X-representation in which wave functions Ψ of N-particle systems are functions of the position vectors of the N particles,

In the X-representation the observables Rk act pointwise (are multiplicative operators) and the momentum operators Pk are given by differential operators

The one-particle kinetic energy operator is


References

  1. M. Planck, Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteiling im Normalspectrum [On the energy distribution law in the normal spectrum], Annalen der Physik, vol. 4, pp. 553-563 (1901) Online. First presented on December 14, 1900 for the Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft.
  2. A. Einstein, Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt [On a heuristic point view regarding the creation and conversion of light], Annalen der Physik, vol. 17, pp. 132 - 148, online.
  3. L. de Broglie, Waves and Quanta, Nature, vol. 112, October 13, 1923, p. 540 Online
  4. E. Schrödinger, Quantisierung als Eigenwerproblem [quantization as eigenvalue problem] Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge, Band 79, p. 361 (1926) Online