Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- '''Intelligent design''' ('''ID''') is the claim that fundamental features of the [[universe]] an ...rom the National Academy of Sciences, Second Edition (1999)].'</ref> See [[intelligent design movement]] for an account of political efforts to promote education about41 KB (6,423 words) - 10:03, 14 February 2021
- ...that I can't support. Non-scientists will not understand the charge that Intelligent Design is "untestable" or that ID doesn't make predictions. By gutting their argu ...e universe and living things are best explained by an intelligent cause. [[intelligent design movement | Proponents of ID]] generally evidence this claim by pointing to186 KB (30,768 words) - 13:37, 19 February 2013
- #REDIRECT [[Intelligent design]]32 bytes (3 words) - 23:33, 24 May 2007
- 0 bytes (0 words) - 07:17, 17 May 2007
- | pagename = Intelligent design | abc = Intelligent design830 bytes (66 words) - 17:39, 13 September 2020
- 12 bytes (1 word) - 19:43, 3 November 2007
- * Numbers, Ronald L. ''The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design'' (2nd ed 2006) * [[Robert T. Pennock|Pennock, Robert T.]] ''Intelligent Design Creationism And Its Critics'' (2001, MIT Press)2 KB (291 words) - 07:22, 25 August 2008
- The '''Intelligent Design movement''' is a political movement designed to weaken Darwinism, especiall ...re best explained by purposeful causation — a "higher intelligence." See [[intelligent design]] for a better explanation of these claims, and why they are not supported20 KB (3,035 words) - 07:31, 20 April 2024
- #REDIRECT [[Intelligent design movement]]41 bytes (4 words) - 08:33, 17 May 2007
- 145 bytes (19 words) - 05:02, 1 July 2008
- ...r that they are referring to the Christian God.. If it is the god that the intelligent design ''movement'' is referring to , then it'' is'' the Christian God, isn't it? ...din fitting for this article. He may have advocated a form of "lower case" intelligent design, but he's certainly not advocating the same sort of thing as Behe, Dembski16 KB (2,642 words) - 21:14, 25 July 2011
- ...really get this item. ''Why'' shouldn't theological considerations about intelligent design be permitted? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:28, 26 February 2007 Bleh, does someone know how to capitalise Intelligent Design correctly in this article. Should there be a distinction between the moveme104 KB (17,261 words) - 10:49, 27 May 2007
- :''See also: [[Intelligent design/Bibliography|Intelligent Design > Bibliography]]'' * Numbers, Ronald L. ''The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design'' (2nd ed 2006)809 bytes (101 words) - 14:27, 26 September 2008
- ...les. He sees no conflict in religion and Evolution and no conflict between Intelligent Design and science. We enjoyed a fascinating discussion on this topic yesterday be ...r [[Intelligent design explanation]]? Or [[Intelligent design idea]]? Or [[Intelligent design proposal]]? Just trying to avoid 'theory'. [[User:John Stephenson|John Step102 KB (16,719 words) - 10:49, 27 May 2007
- | pagename = Intelligent design movement | abc = Intelligent design movement845 bytes (85 words) - 08:38, 15 March 2024
- 12 bytes (1 word) - 19:46, 3 November 2007
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}}243 bytes (32 words) - 09:48, 25 March 2024
- ...al report reprinted from ''Natural History'' magazine. Three proponents of intelligent design present their views. Each view is followed by a response from a proponent o *[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10545387/ Judge rules against ‘intelligent design’] msnbc.com988 bytes (126 words) - 10:40, 25 October 2010
- 152 bytes (19 words) - 11:52, 2 February 2023
- *[[Intelligent design]]719 bytes (109 words) - 05:25, 26 September 2008
Page text matches
- ...al report reprinted from ''Natural History'' magazine. Three proponents of intelligent design present their views. Each view is followed by a response from a proponent o *[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10545387/ Judge rules against ‘intelligent design’] msnbc.com988 bytes (126 words) - 10:40, 25 October 2010
- :''See also: [[Intelligent design/Bibliography|Intelligent Design > Bibliography]]'' * Numbers, Ronald L. ''The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design'' (2nd ed 2006)809 bytes (101 words) - 14:27, 26 September 2008
- == ACLU and "intelligent design" == ...rnmental agency tried to use governmental power to silence a proponent of "intelligent design," the ACLU would defend that person's free-speech rights. So perhaps should808 bytes (118 words) - 19:20, 20 October 2008
- #REDIRECT [[Intelligent design]]32 bytes (3 words) - 23:33, 24 May 2007
- #REDIRECT [[Intelligent design movement]]41 bytes (4 words) - 08:33, 17 May 2007
- | pagename = Intelligent design | abc = Intelligent design830 bytes (66 words) - 17:39, 13 September 2020
- Conservative think-tank based in Seattle; best-known for promoting [[intelligent design]] creationism.138 bytes (14 words) - 01:42, 5 January 2009
- * Numbers, Ronald L. ''The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design'' (2nd ed 2006) * [[Robert T. Pennock|Pennock, Robert T.]] ''Intelligent Design Creationism And Its Critics'' (2001, MIT Press)2 KB (291 words) - 07:22, 25 August 2008
- | pagename = Intelligent design movement | abc = Intelligent design movement845 bytes (85 words) - 08:38, 15 March 2024
- ...d against views that are incompatible with metaphysical naturalism, namely intelligent design.1 KB (203 words) - 18:34, 17 December 2009
- {{rpl|Intelligent design}}128 bytes (18 words) - 05:09, 24 September 2013
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}} {{r|Intelligent design}}729 bytes (94 words) - 18:36, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}}243 bytes (32 words) - 09:48, 25 March 2024
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}}225 bytes (27 words) - 11:01, 15 April 2024
- {{r|intelligent design}}221 bytes (28 words) - 14:06, 12 August 2008
- {{r|intelligent design}}166 bytes (20 words) - 18:20, 26 January 2009
- ...a, but is best known for being the institutional home of many promoters of intelligent design. It receives significant sums from a variety of conservative foundations in ...gn proponentsists".</ref>. The Discovery Institute fellows responsible for Intelligent Design advocacy include Phillip E. Johnson, Stephen C. Meyer, Jonathan Wells, Will3 KB (486 words) - 01:55, 27 March 2024
- *[[Intelligent design]]719 bytes (109 words) - 05:25, 26 September 2008
- Could there be some confusion with Kitzmiller v. Dover, a case on [[intelligent design]] where, I believe, those opposing the ID position were charged with being428 bytes (65 words) - 13:56, 22 March 2009
- {{r|Intelligent Design}}320 bytes (41 words) - 05:31, 28 August 2009
- {{r|Intelligent design}}605 bytes (77 words) - 14:41, 18 March 2024
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}}472 bytes (59 words) - 16:00, 11 January 2010
- ...est is in philosophical issues around [[evolution]], [[creationism]] and [[Intelligent Design]] - the latter two he fiercely opposes. The books ''Darwinism Defended: A G ...tp://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2006/mar/27/religion.schools Why the intelligent design lobby thanks God for Richard Dawkins], ''[[The Guardian]]'', March 27, 20062 KB (301 words) - 05:49, 2 November 2008
- {{r|Intelligent design}}1 KB (163 words) - 07:29, 24 April 2024
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}}553 bytes (74 words) - 09:58, 27 June 2023
- {{r|Intelligent design}}865 bytes (109 words) - 10:28, 9 May 2024
- {{r|Intelligent design}}678 bytes (87 words) - 19:33, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Intelligent design}}1 KB (130 words) - 17:26, 11 January 2010
- *[[Intelligent design]]807 bytes (119 words) - 16:23, 29 November 2008
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}}1 KB (143 words) - 10:58, 11 January 2010
- ...ution in late 20th century; covers Darwinism, young earth creationism, and intelligent design.1 KB (180 words) - 16:22, 29 November 2008
- * [[Intelligent Design]]3 KB (517 words) - 02:35, 19 September 2013
- ==Intelligent design== Hello, Dr. Haisch. I wish to point out to you that [[intelligent design]] is a currently active article and that your input there would be very imp6 KB (977 words) - 04:37, 8 March 2024
- ...from government buildings, supporting [[gay rights]], and opposition to [[Intelligent Design]]: ACLU lawyers represented Scopes at the "monkey trial" in 1925. The ACLU2 KB (224 words) - 09:39, 11 May 2024
- * [[Robert T. Pennock]], ''Intelligent Design Creationism And Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological and Scientific Pers1 KB (182 words) - 20:00, 25 April 2009
- The '''Intelligent Design movement''' is a political movement designed to weaken Darwinism, especiall ...re best explained by purposeful causation — a "higher intelligence." See [[intelligent design]] for a better explanation of these claims, and why they are not supported20 KB (3,035 words) - 07:31, 20 April 2024
- Take a specific example. [[Intelligent Design]] is a subject that most experts in biology consider not worth serious cons * [[Intelligent Design]]5 KB (813 words) - 05:53, 15 February 2008
- ...r that they are referring to the Christian God.. If it is the god that the intelligent design ''movement'' is referring to , then it'' is'' the Christian God, isn't it? ...din fitting for this article. He may have advocated a form of "lower case" intelligent design, but he's certainly not advocating the same sort of thing as Behe, Dembski16 KB (2,642 words) - 21:14, 25 July 2011
- {{r|Intelligent design}}4 KB (486 words) - 19:46, 11 January 2010
- *''Expelled'' (2008) Pro-[[intelligent design]] documentary; Dawkins appeared after receiving misleading information abou3 KB (480 words) - 02:00, 5 January 2011
- ...e this concern of a general scientific conspiracy with the proponents of [[intelligent design]], a form of creationism that makes no claim on the age of the earth but do ...based ministry that promotes young earth creationism (Creationism 'lite'; 'Intelligent design' proponents marry God and evolution.<ref> The Record (Bergen County, NJ),11 KB (1,608 words) - 04:16, 22 November 2023
- Taylor, R. S. (2006, April). Examination of the Evolution vs. Intelligent Design5 KB (724 words) - 04:38, 22 November 2023
- * [[Robert T. Pennock]], ''Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics'', Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2001.3 KB (396 words) - 00:23, 16 July 2013
- Hi William, thanks for the start on [[intelligent design]]. Could you give us a bio please? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09 ...at least more compatible with it. But you're right, there is no reason why intelligent design has to be perfect.13 KB (2,289 words) - 08:03, 6 July 2007
- ...ionists forced them to follow a new strategy, relabelling creationism as [[intelligent design]], which led to the 2004 ''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School Board'' case.4 KB (572 words) - 15:46, 2 February 2024
- ...1814/Evolution-Creationism-Intelligent-Design.aspx Evolution, Creationism, Intelligent Design].</ref> [[Old Earth creationists]] accept the age figures supplied by astro ...hool District'' (2005) agreed with Scott, the NCSE and the plaintiffs that intelligent design's religious nature "would be readily observable to an objective observer" a26 KB (3,971 words) - 04:23, 12 June 2023
- ...nt his views. The latest is his appearance in the creationist-backed pro-[[intelligent design]] film ''[[Expelled]]'' (2008), which Dawkins and others participated in un4 KB (670 words) - 08:50, 18 October 2013
- '''Intelligent design''' ('''ID''') is the claim that fundamental features of the [[universe]] an ...rom the National Academy of Sciences, Second Edition (1999)].'</ref> See [[intelligent design movement]] for an account of political efforts to promote education about41 KB (6,423 words) - 10:03, 14 February 2021
- Last but not least, is [[intelligent design]] correctly classified as [[Creationism]]? Is this only on the view of Euge ...he literature around creationism (especially when doing my dissertation on Intelligent Design), and I haven't really seen anyone else either provide significant critique31 KB (5,097 words) - 10:15, 10 July 2011
- ...tzmiller v. Dover Area School District]]'' results in a decision against [[intelligent design]].5 KB (718 words) - 14:06, 22 March 2009
- {{cite book |title=The cosmic landscape: string theory and the illusion of intelligent design |author=Leonard Susskind |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=RIW9E1sOyxUC6 KB (907 words) - 07:58, 28 May 2022
- ...Haught]] and [[Barbara Forrest]] argued against it, then came down against Intelligent Design, declaring it to be religious and not to be taught in science for the reaso20 KB (2,986 words) - 11:59, 8 May 2024
- Case in point: [[intelligent design]] advocates frequently say that they are on the cusp of a Kuhnian revolutio6 KB (919 words) - 19:55, 2 June 2010
- ...going to be able to do much to change that. (There was a recent case, in [[Intelligent design]], I believe, in which a new *author*, NOT an *editor*, came in and made *s6 KB (1,038 words) - 12:26, 26 May 2009
- ...5/science/sciencespecial2/05design.html Closing Arguments Made in Trial on Intelligent Design]''New York Times'', November 5, 2005</ref>).16 KB (2,443 words) - 13:39, 25 January 2011
- ...really get this item. ''Why'' shouldn't theological considerations about intelligent design be permitted? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:28, 26 February 2007 Bleh, does someone know how to capitalise Intelligent Design correctly in this article. Should there be a distinction between the moveme104 KB (17,261 words) - 10:49, 27 May 2007
- ...2)to motivate editors to get their articles approved. Articles such as [[Intelligent design]] and [[Global warming]] are the reason I thought them necessary initially.12 KB (1,944 words) - 13:37, 12 February 2008
- ...position with which one need not compromise. For example, an advocate of intelligent design might unreasonably request that every mention of evolution in all biology a9 KB (1,476 words) - 14:57, 24 January 2008
- - [[Intelligent design movement]] -9 KB (1,506 words) - 12:35, 7 May 2024
- ...something of a resurgence of popularity for this argument in the form of [[intelligent design]].23 KB (3,598 words) - 11:48, 2 February 2023
- ...ideas to be given classroom time: whether that means [[creationism]] or [[intelligent design]], [[comparative religion]] compared to specific religious instruction, abs9 KB (1,387 words) - 15:38, 1 April 2024
- ...in Wikipedia as you described sounds like the debates on Climate Change & Intelligent Design. I think I got to side with science here, but as long as the article is des13 KB (2,031 words) - 17:47, 15 January 2021
- ...les. He sees no conflict in religion and Evolution and no conflict between Intelligent Design and science. We enjoyed a fascinating discussion on this topic yesterday be ...r [[Intelligent design explanation]]? Or [[Intelligent design idea]]? Or [[Intelligent design proposal]]? Just trying to avoid 'theory'. [[User:John Stephenson|John Step102 KB (16,719 words) - 10:49, 27 May 2007
- {{rpr|Intelligent design}} 14077 KB (774 words) - 05:13, 8 March 2024
- In the beginning, the first book, [[Genesis]], tells the stories of [[Intelligent design|the Creation]], [[Adam and Eve]], [[Noah]] and the [[Flood]], the [[Tower o9 KB (1,381 words) - 15:55, 12 August 2020
- {{rpr|Intelligent design}}11 KB (1,461 words) - 10:46, 7 March 2024
- ...n an encyclopedia. We have of that right now in the US re creationism and intelligent design and that sort of thing. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 00:45, 28 Ju9 KB (1,430 words) - 13:52, 29 November 2008
- ...nist (including both young- and old-earth creationist, and supporters of [[intelligent design]] theory). Politically, Conservapedia takes a position that is [[abortion|a11 KB (1,540 words) - 07:09, 26 March 2024
- ...validates particular religious or political beliefs. [[Creationism]] and [[intelligent design]] are both adopted primarily because they support certain religious – oft ===Intelligent design===39 KB (6,025 words) - 18:53, 30 April 2024
- ...ion articles, relatively little affected by the continual struggle against intelligent design and unintelligent vandalism. How much further do we drill down until we get ...ion articles, relatively little affected by the continual struggle against intelligent design and unintelligent vandalism. How much further do we drill down until we get29 KB (4,813 words) - 05:55, 14 December 2011
- {{rpr|Intelligent design}}12 KB (1,633 words) - 17:33, 11 March 2024
- ...[[Evolution]] does not have to contain 50 percent of its material about [[Intelligent design]]. Or maybe anything more than a single sentence buried somewhere deep with12 KB (1,874 words) - 00:35, 23 September 2009
- ...ministry that promotes young Earth creationism. <ref> Creationism 'Lite': 'Intelligent design' proponents marry God and evolution. wire service dispatch in ''The Record11 KB (1,790 words) - 09:53, 11 June 2023
- ...gs that are outside Turing or Godel scope. As it reads, there's almost an Intelligent Design flavor. Could someone clarify? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowi12 KB (2,006 words) - 09:25, 14 May 2010
- ...d.)<ref>Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design by David Mu. Harvard Science Review, Volume 19, Issue 1, Fall 2005. [http:/ ...they cannot have evolved from simpler systems. It is used by proponents of intelligent design to argue that evolution by [[natural selection]] alone is incomplete or fla42 KB (6,290 words) - 03:53, 22 November 2023
- ...Integer]], [[Integral]], [[Integrated circuit]], [[Intelligent design]], [[Intelligent design movement]], [[Intellipedia]], [[Intercanthal scales]], [[Intercultural comp28 KB (3,165 words) - 07:33, 20 April 2024
- ...that I can't support. Non-scientists will not understand the charge that Intelligent Design is "untestable" or that ID doesn't make predictions. By gutting their argu ...e universe and living things are best explained by an intelligent cause. [[intelligent design movement | Proponents of ID]] generally evidence this claim by pointing to186 KB (30,768 words) - 13:37, 19 February 2013
- More recently, the battles over teaching [[evolution]] and [[intelligent design]] in the public schools have brought some philosophical issues to the fore31 KB (4,648 words) - 05:07, 26 October 2013
- ...t some intelligence must have been involved in their design. The theory of Intelligent Design is accepted by very few biologists; most do not agree that the theory of na60 KB (9,261 words) - 15:41, 23 September 2013
- ...ficant conflict tend to span workgroups, or be outside them - e.g. Jesus, Intelligent Design, Scientific Method, Pseudoscience, and those with political overtones where ...contentious articles. We don't have a workable mechanism for approving say Intelligent Design, even though that article now seems to be stable and in good shape.[[User:G51 KB (8,532 words) - 12:14, 13 March 2024
- ==Intelligent Design== ...A)</ref><ref>[http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/ Intelligent Design] Intelligent Design network.</ref>''91 KB (14,893 words) - 06:23, 2 March 2021
- ...t some intelligence must have been involved in their design. The theory of Intelligent Design is accepted by very few biologists; most do not agree that the theory of na64 KB (9,985 words) - 12:27, 24 March 2022
- For a discussion by a proponent of intelligent design, see for example {{cite book |title=Climate Confusion: How global warming h44 KB (6,711 words) - 20:01, 11 October 2013
- ...e. I encourage you to flag me where I'm wrong. As I've demonstrated on the Intelligent Design page, I'm happy and willing to concede facts and bow to logic. My history a ::::I have great respect for the result of the arguing at Intelligent Design and would suggest you take a look at the grace and dignity with which this49 KB (8,300 words) - 09:26, 3 August 2007
- ...1814/evolution-creationism-intelligent-design.aspx Evolution, Creationism, Intelligent Design].</ref>19 KB (3,082 words) - 21:20, 11 March 2011
- ...2)to motivate editors to get their articles approved. Articles such as [[Intelligent design]] and [[Global warming]] are the reason I thought them necessary initially.33 KB (5,350 words) - 18:42, 3 March 2024
- ...e supernatural, e.g. 'Pseudoscience and the Supernatural'. Candidate #1: [[Intelligent Design]]. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 23:59, 14 June 2007 (CDT)28 KB (4,382 words) - 10:47, 4 September 2013
- ...y?'' The "science is persecuting me!" meme is getting tired quickly: the [[intelligent design]] advocates are claiming it, as are many other fields: often subscription t :The "science is persecuting me!" meme is getting tired quickly: the [[intelligent design]] advocates are claiming it, as are many other fields70 KB (11,580 words) - 09:37, 8 August 2023
- 1) intelligent design ...r the serious cases, we'd be duplicating the critiques on theeir articles (intelligent design for example). I think there might be a virtue in taking one or two examples112 KB (18,028 words) - 05:48, 20 February 2024
- ::-The Brothers Winn, "Darwin's Intelligent Design", WhatYouOughtToKnow.com ...ves as something of a 'missing link' between today's evolutionists and the Intelligent Design Crowd.(Ron Grossman, Chicago Tribune Commentary, "A Missing Link? The Man E42 KB (6,957 words) - 04:10, 22 November 2023
- ...ly correct, however, in the context of first life RNA may well be correct. Intelligent design tends to use modern definitions of life, hence they invoke the impossabilit ...NA according to the established scientific worldview that is challenged by intelligent design. [[User:Christian Kleineidam|Christian Kleineidam]] 17:21, 11 March 2008 (C77 KB (12,523 words) - 03:52, 8 March 2024
- ...mater of fact everybody has an ID. It seems to me id, or ID redirecting to intelligent design seems not a good idea. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | <span s25 KB (4,154 words) - 15:35, 24 October 2009
- ...be a significant blow to notions of [[creationism|divine creation]] and [[intelligent design]] prevalent in [[19th-century]] science, specifically overturning the [[Cre48 KB (7,518 words) - 07:31, 20 April 2024
- Hi Stephen, Sorry I just now spotted your suggestion about Intelligent Design, but I need to leave that to someone with expertise in biology or a related30 KB (5,096 words) - 03:41, 17 April 2007
- ...iss army knife, are misleading because computers and tools are products of intelligent design. In contrast, minds are products of natural selection whose intertwined com31 KB (4,553 words) - 18:17, 18 July 2016
- ...the perfect solution for certain types of controversial articles, e.g., [[Intelligent Design]], one pro, one con. I know of one eminent expert on it who I think would37 KB (6,107 words) - 17:02, 5 March 2024
- ...up by mistake, or by following a precedent of the placement of the article intelligent design. A case can be made for the latter, but including a fundamentalist religiou37 KB (5,952 words) - 12:01, 7 March 2024
- ...ed in a controversial topic take a look at the result of arguments about [[Intelligent Design]]. It is possible to give fair voice to all sides and still empower the rea :I point to [[Intelligent Design]] as an example of how a very controversial issue can be handled quite nice79 KB (12,992 words) - 09:19, 3 August 2007
- ...ing Spaghetti Monster]]-ism.''' Created to mock advocacy and teaching of [[intelligent design]].35 KB (5,281 words) - 18:42, 3 March 2024
- ...lution.” One might add that nothing in biology makes sense in the light of intelligent design.69 KB (9,985 words) - 09:20, 11 May 2024