Talk:Alexander Long: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David Martin
No edit summary
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Alexander Long
|                cat1 = Politics
|                cat2 = History
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = N
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = Y
|            cleanup = Y
|                  by = [[User:David Martin|David Martin]] 21:07, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
}}


==Reconquer?==
==Reconquer?==

Revision as of 09:25, 24 September 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition (1816-1886) American politician who served as a Representative from Ohio; a member of the Democratic Party, Long was one of the anti-war Copperheads who were vociferously opposed to the U.S. Civil War. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Politics and History [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Reconquer?

The phrase "reconquer the Confederate States of America" seems inappropriate here -- in a Civil War, when each set of states or territories is a part of a fractured whole (Federalist or otherwise), for either side to win would not seem to me to be for them to conquer the other! Russell Potter 21:25, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

Oh, thanks for pointing that out. "reconquer" is a little biased. But right now I can't think of a better one. Which term would you suggest? Yi Zhe Wu 21:36, 7 May 2007 (CDT)
At this point, I'd just suggest cutting the phrase "a war led by President Abraham Lincoln to reconquer the Confederate States of America, a confederacy of eleven Southern states that seceded from the Union" since the wikilink to U.S. Civil War will take care of that; the appositive phrase isn't needed. Russell Potter 21:40, 7 May 2007 (CDT)
Done. Also I added some explanation to copperheads, if anyone think it's redundant feel free to delete that one as well. Thanks! Yi Zhe Wu 21:42, 7 May 2007 (CDT)