Talk:RNA interference/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Chris Day (adjust) |
imported>Chris Day (adjust) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| | {| | ||
| width= | | width=35%| | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| width=45%| | | width=45%| | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 14:29, 13 May 2007 (CDT) | | by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 14:29, 13 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
| width= | | width=20%| | ||
{{Archive box|auto=long|approved=yes}} | {{Archive box|auto=long|approved=yes}} | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 14:40, 14 May 2007
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
|
Article re-approval and version record area
Article re-approval and version record area
Article re-approval and version record areaReserved for a log of event re-approval of horizontal gene transfer and template records. See here for help. This is a collection of minor error corrections and typs. No matter of substance. I consider this is purely an editorial action. One editor approval should be adequate . David Tribe 06:46, 17 April 2007 (CDT) Version 1 approval(Tribe, Leng, Sculerati) After further editing that has occurred subsequent to conversations between Tribe and Leng, Tribe and SchuleratiI think its time to place this template with a one week period before the deadline. I see the whole process as a system of checks and balances with trade offs between our goals . I will update the URL pointer as various copy edits come in David Tribe 23:48, 6 February 2007 (CST)
Version 1.1 approval
Straightforward correction of minor errors (bug fix) no substantial changes. Short approval time satisfactory David Tribe 07:06, 17 April 2007 (CDT) Next versionBegins here.. |
hello
Good evening. I did some copy editing. There was a comma and a further plural issue which I decided not to change, thinking that these may have been intentional. Again the approved version contains the same errors which I have corrected. William Hart 07:32, 20 February 2007 (CST)
why the disclaimer?
why the disclaimer in the approved box? -Tom Kelly (Talk) 21:03, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
- See the discussion here: Template_talk:Approved Chris Day (talk) 11:59, 13 April 2007 (CDT)
- Biology Category Check
- General Category Check
- Health Sciences Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Biology Advanced Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Advanced Articles
- Health Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Biology Developed Articles
- Health Sciences Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Health Sciences Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Biology Stub Articles
- Health Sciences Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Biology External Articles
- Health Sciences External Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Health Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Biology Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Health Sciences Cleanup
- Cleanup
- Article with Definition