Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

  • ...atala R, ''et al'' |title=Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 1. Relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat |journal=CMAJ |volume=1 :<math>\mbox{Relative risk reduction} =\left (\frac{\mbox{CER - EER}}{\mbox{CER}}\right)</math>
    3 KB (389 words) - 23:44, 1 March 2009
  • 12 bytes (1 word) - 15:19, 16 March 2008
  • 138 bytes (17 words) - 10:34, 8 September 2009
  • Auto-populated based on [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Relative risk reduction]]. Needs checking by a human.
    812 bytes (102 words) - 19:58, 11 January 2010

Page text matches

  • {{r|Relative risk reduction}}
    658 bytes (85 words) - 07:41, 8 January 2010
  • {{r|Relative risk reduction}}
    720 bytes (96 words) - 19:58, 11 January 2010
  • Auto-populated based on [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Relative risk reduction]]. Needs checking by a human.
    812 bytes (102 words) - 19:58, 11 January 2010
  • ...atala R, ''et al'' |title=Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 1. Relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat |journal=CMAJ |volume=1 :<math>\mbox{Relative risk reduction} =\left (\frac{\mbox{CER - EER}}{\mbox{CER}}\right)</math>
    3 KB (389 words) - 23:44, 1 March 2009
  • {{r|Relative risk reduction}}
    1 KB (141 words) - 21:48, 19 May 2010
  • ...atala R, ''et al'' |title=Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 1. Relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat |journal=CMAJ |volume=1 Note that the relative risk ratio is that same as 1 - the [[relative risk reduction]].
    3 KB (393 words) - 23:44, 1 March 2009
  • {{r|Relative risk reduction}}
    1 KB (159 words) - 19:07, 11 January 2010
  • ...ew=long&pmid=15313996}}</ref> This measure should be contrasted with the [[relative risk reduction]]. * [[Relative risk reduction]]
    3 KB (376 words) - 00:59, 23 November 2009
  • ...13 |year=2006 |pmid=17130382|doi=10.1001/archinte.166.21.2307}}</ref>. A [[relative risk reduction]] of 19% in coronary mortality was found in a [[meta-analysis]] of patients
    3 KB (339 words) - 09:11, 24 February 2010
  • ...s with severe hepatitis]] for mortality at various times was 0.4 and the [[relative risk reduction]] was 63%. In populations similar to those in this study which had a rate o ...o]] of [[pentoxifylline]] for mortality at various times was 0.6 and the [[relative risk reduction]] was 36.8%. In populations similar to those in this study which had a rate
    6 KB (825 words) - 13:57, 31 January 2012
  • The [[relative risk reduction]] may be used to derive the number needed to treat:<ref name="pmid11914297" ...= \frac{1}{CER * (RRR)} \mbox{, where CER is control event rate and RRR is relative risk reduction}</math>
    6 KB (844 words) - 10:50, 24 June 2009
  • ...], for recurrence of [[clostridium difficile]] infection was 0.6 and the [[relative risk reduction]] was 40.0%. In populations similar to those in this study which had a rate
    2 KB (243 words) - 13:18, 2 February 2023
  • ...nt, as compared to [[placebo]], for nonhealing at 6 days was 0.4 and the [[relative risk reduction]] was 62.2%. In populations similar to those in this study which had a ra
    2 KB (267 words) - 22:23, 29 August 2013
  • ...ion, or stent thrombosis at 48 hours after randomization was 0.8 and the [[relative risk reduction]] was 20.3%. In populations similar to those in this study which had a rate ...rction, or ischemia-driven revascularization at 48 hours was 0.9 and the [[relative risk reduction]] was 12.5%. In populations similar to those in this study which had a rate
    6 KB (873 words) - 12:25, 27 August 2013
  • | [[Relative risk reduction]]
    6 KB (899 words) - 10:21, 4 July 2023
  • ...screening]], for mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma was 0.6 and the [[relative risk reduction]] was 36.7%. In populations similar to those in this study which had a rate
    12 KB (1,601 words) - 08:30, 5 October 2012
  • ...13 years ||Colorectal cancer death:<br/>[[Relative risk ratio]] 0.67<br/>[[Relative risk reduction]] 33% || align="center"|305 ...ears || Colorectal cancer incidence:<br/>[[Relative risk ratio]] 0.2<br/>[[Relative risk reduction]] 80% || align="center"|125
    31 KB (4,194 words) - 13:28, 10 February 2023
  • In overweight people, its use is associated with a relative risk reduction of:
    33 KB (4,839 words) - 10:20, 6 December 2023
  • ...ears|| &bull;&nbsp;[[Relative risk reduction|RRR]] = 75%<br/>&bull;&nbsp;[[Relative risk reduction|RRR]] = 67%<br/>Both regimens were effective [[Relative risk reduction|RRR]] = 67%<br/>Effective
    31 KB (4,264 words) - 13:22, 2 February 2023
  • * In 2006, a [[meta-analysis]] reported a [[relative risk reduction]] in major vascular events of 29.2% in patients treated for 4.3 years. Ther ...domized controlled trial]]s found reduction in vascular events and a 19% [[relative risk reduction]] in coronary mortality.<ref name="pmid16214597">{{cite journal |author=Bai
    42 KB (5,816 words) - 10:22, 8 March 2015
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)