Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • {{rpl|Confidence interval}}
    156 bytes (19 words) - 05:58, 26 September 2013
  • #Redirect [[Confidence interval]]
    33 bytes (3 words) - 14:14, 20 May 2008
  • ...true value of a random variable lies within the estimated (or predicted) ''confidence interval''.
    159 bytes (21 words) - 13:51, 1 July 2009
  • ...ctor V Leiden]]|| 2.01 ([[Confidence interval|95% CI]] 1.13-3.58)||7.83 ([[Confidence interval|95% CI]] 2.83-21.67) ...10A||valign="top"|2.56 ([[Confidence interval|95% CI]] 1.04-.29)|| 2.30 ([[Confidence interval|95% CI]] 1.09-4.87)<br/> (non-recurrent)
    4 KB (517 words) - 15:32, 12 November 2010
  • ...d with bicarbonate developed ESRD (6.5 versus 33%; relative risk 0.13; 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.40; P < 0.001). Nutritional parameters improved significantly wit
    2 KB (196 words) - 19:49, 29 October 2009
  • {{r|Confidence interval}}
    575 bytes (70 words) - 07:35, 16 April 2010
  • {{r|Confidence interval}}
    529 bytes (68 words) - 16:23, 11 January 2010
  • The '''Confidence interval''' (CI) is a "range of values for a variable of interest, e.g., a rate, con
    2 KB (264 words) - 00:36, 24 January 2011
  • {{r|Confidence interval}}
    814 bytes (102 words) - 19:54, 11 January 2010
  • ...icant increase in cardiovascular events (pooled [[relative risk]], 1.14 ([[confidence interval|CI]], 0.92 to 1.41])).<ref name="pmid20194238">{{cite journal| author=Wang ...an insignificant increase in mortality (pooled [[relative risk]], 1.07 ([[confidence interval|CI]], 0.95 to 1.19])).<ref name="pmid20671013">{{cite journal| author=Bolla
    6 KB (899 words) - 11:12, 20 November 2022
  • ...to 50 mg/day||Placebo|| mortality at 21 months|| 12.5%|| 15.5%||HR=0.76 ([[confidence interval|95% CI]]: 0.62 - 0.93) (P=0.008)<br/>(stopped early)|| &bull;&nbsp;> 5.5 me ...ctone]] 25 mg/day||Placebo|| mortality at 24 months|| 35%||46%||RR=0.70 ([[confidence interval|95% CI]]: 0.60 to 0.82) P<0.001<br/>(stopped early)||&bull;&nbsp;"Serious h
    6 KB (789 words) - 00:07, 21 February 2011
  • The 95% [[confidence interval]]s can be calculated by the method of Boada.<ref name="pmid18974868">{{cite
    3 KB (425 words) - 08:03, 10 September 2020
  • ...or<br>high-grade dysplasia<br>% ([[confidence interval]])!! Total<br>% ([[confidence interval]])
    9 KB (1,154 words) - 05:44, 3 October 2013
  • ...sed risk of MetS compared to subjects in the fourth quartile (OR 1.35, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.16 to 1.57). Subjects in the second quartile of potassium intake als ...lower risk of MS (P=0.002) in women, but not in men (P=0.161). 0.739; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.626-0.873, P<0.001) in women.
    6 KB (808 words) - 18:09, 26 December 2012
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 97.2% (95% [[Confidence interval|CI]], 96.2% to 98.0%) * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 87.4% ([[Confidence interval|CI]], 84.5% to 89.8%)
    9 KB (1,111 words) - 11:34, 2 April 2010
  • ...nd the normal and chi-square distributions given above form the basis of [[confidence interval]] calculations relying on [[Student's t-distribution]]. In those calculati
    4 KB (662 words) - 11:40, 26 September 2007
  • ...occinum prevented an influenza-like syndrome (relative risk (RR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28 to 1.43). Treatment, however, reduced the length of illness by 0.
    5 KB (616 words) - 09:16, 25 August 2010
  • ...tical significance|significantly]] increased [[odds ratio]] of 1.12 (95% [[confidence interval|CI]], 1.04-1.22; I(2) = 0%)<ref name="pmid21693744">{{cite journal| author= ...tical significance|significantly]] increased [[odds ratio]] of 1.09 (95% [[confidence interval|CI]], 1.02-1.17; I(2) = 11%) <ref name="pmid20167359">{{cite journal| autho
    14 KB (1,963 words) - 10:30, 28 August 2013
  • * 95% [[confidence interval]] is <u>+</u> 1.96 * [[standard error]].
    9 KB (1,291 words) - 04:36, 27 June 2009
  • |colspan="2"|[[Odds ratio]] = 0.99; 95% [[Confidence interval|CI]], 0.68 - 1.44; P=0.96);<br/>"There was no apparent cardiovascular inter |colspan="2"|[[Odds ratio]] = 1.64 (95% [[Confidence interval|CI]] 1.16-2.32)<br/>"Patients who received clopidogrel plus a PPI had a sig
    26 KB (3,487 words) - 14:06, 2 February 2023
  • ! [[Confidence interval]]
    6 KB (899 words) - 10:21, 4 July 2023
  • ...of the population as a whole. Sampling error is typically expressed as a [[confidence interval]] of plus or minus some number of percentage points associated with a stati
    19 KB (2,974 words) - 02:40, 15 February 2010
  • ...at 1.34 although this increase was not statistically significant with a [[confidence interval]] of 0.30 to 5.97.<ref name="pmid17253458">{{cite journal |author=Walters E
    9 KB (1,175 words) - 14:01, 29 April 2010
  • * 95% [[confidence interval]] is <u>+</u> 1.96 * [[standard error]].
    15 KB (2,373 words) - 12:26, 20 February 2021
  • ...f error is readily quantified as the sample's "standard error", or as the "confidence interval" within which the mean observation may be expected to lie<ref>[http://statt ...at least a stipulate load, or that a variable lies within a stipulated [[confidence interval]]). Among the most powerful of the techniques of statistical analysis is th
    31 KB (4,704 words) - 00:37, 21 October 2013
  • ...primary outcome 0.79<br/>&bull;&nbsp;relative risk for death 0.89 (95% [[confidence interval|CI]]: 0.80 to 0.99; P=0.047) ...r primary outcome 0.79<br/>&bull;&nbsp;relative risk for death 0.92 (95% [[confidence interval|CI]]: 0.82 to 1.03; P=0.15)
    32 KB (4,336 words) - 20:38, 2 February 2015
  • ...bolism at 37 months|| 4.8%|| 6.5%|| [[relative risk ratio]] = 0.74 (95% [[confidence interval|CI]]: 0.52 to 1.05; P=0.09) 0.58 (95% [[confidence interval|CI]]: 0.36 to 0.93)
    29 KB (3,995 words) - 11:45, 2 February 2023
  • ...lleagues analyzed 89 trials and found a ''mean odds ratio of 2.45 (95% confidence interval, 2.05–2.93)'' in favor of homeopathy.<ref name=Linde1997>{{citation ...influenza and influenza-like symptoms (<math>(relative risk (RR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28 to 1.43).</math>). The review of research found evidence for a sm
    28 KB (3,976 words) - 09:55, 31 October 2011
  • ...nnals.org/cgi/content/full/130/12/995}}</ref> This approach can generate [[confidence interval]]s.
    18 KB (2,448 words) - 05:50, 13 June 2011
  • ...room''. The upper [http://medinformatics.uthscsa.edu/calculator/calc.shtml confidence interval] for 0% of 135 is 5%, so for statistical reasons alone, there is up to a 5%
    17 KB (2,327 words) - 13:00, 22 December 2015
  • * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 97.2% (95% [[Confidence interval|CI]], 96.2% to 98.0%) * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 87.4% ([[Confidence interval|CI]], 84.5% to 89.8%)
    41 KB (5,532 words) - 23:14, 6 October 2013
  • ...at 1.34 although this increase was not statistically significant with a [[confidence interval]] of 0.30 to 5.97.<ref name="pmid17253458">{{cite journal |author=Walters E
    23 KB (3,192 words) - 11:50, 2 February 2023
  • ...ee of CVD and hypertension (RR = 0.71 per standard deviation increase; 95% confidence interval: 0.51-1.00).
    35 KB (5,116 words) - 08:31, 11 September 2023
  • * [[Confidence interval]]
    21 KB (2,958 words) - 05:06, 8 March 2024
  • | [[magnetic resonance imaging|MRI]] || 99%<br/> ([[Confidence interval|95% CI]] 0.23 to 1.00)|| 92%|| 81%|| 100% | [[X-ray computed tomography|CT scan]]|| 39%<br/>([[Confidence interval|95% CI]] 0.16 to 0.69)|| 100%|| 89%<sup>†</sup>|| 100%<sup>†</sup>
    50 KB (7,152 words) - 09:23, 6 January 2012
  • ...1 years ||Colorectal cancer death:<br/>[[Relative risk ratio]] 0.67 (95% [[Confidence interval|CI]]: 0.60-0.76)|| align="center"|688
    31 KB (4,194 words) - 13:28, 10 February 2023
  • ...ents<br/>&bull;&nbsp;5 [[randomized controlled trial|RCTs]]|| OR = 0.80 ([[Confidence interval|95% CI]]:0.74-0.87) ...ients<br/>&bull;&nbsp;8 [[randomized controlled trial|RCTs]]||OR = 0.98 ([[Confidence interval|95% CI]]: 0.89-1.09)
    73 KB (10,150 words) - 21:46, 20 August 2014
  • However, I<sup>2</sup>, even when the value is 0%, can be misleading if the [[confidence interval]]s around the value are not provided.<ref name="pmid17974687">{{cite journa
    73 KB (9,970 words) - 13:21, 2 February 2023
  • ...to <25), obesity (BMI >30) was associated with 111,909 excess deaths (95% confidence interval [CI], 53,754-170,064) and underweight [BMI <18.5] with 33,746 excess deaths
    50 KB (7,332 words) - 17:37, 18 July 2016
  • ...of death for all patients by 58% for all patients (relative risk 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.89; P=0.02). Overall mortality was 9% (21 deaths) in the high flo
    48 KB (6,593 words) - 11:52, 2 February 2023
  • ...of hyperkalemia-associated hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval, 4.5-10.0). No such risk was found with the use of comparator antibiotics.
    121 KB (14,114 words) - 21:20, 1 January 2014
  • ! Wells score !! Death (%) from [[embolism and thrombosis]] ([[Confidence interval|95% CI]])
    71 KB (9,981 words) - 10:49, 8 March 2024