Talk:Stravenue: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>J. Noel Chiappa
(aiee, feedback loop!)
imported>Hayford Peirce
(→‎Referential loops: the CZ article existed first -- the newspaper is quoting from it. this ought to be permissible to point out)
Line 4: Line 4:


[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Stravenue&curid=100047779&diff=100287088&oldid=100278678 ''added info from a Tucson newspaper about stravenues -- the article mentions CZ as a source''] - aiee, feedback loop! :-) [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 14:03, 14 March 2008 (CDT)
[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Stravenue&curid=100047779&diff=100287088&oldid=100278678 ''added info from a Tucson newspaper about stravenues -- the article mentions CZ as a source''] - aiee, feedback loop! :-) [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 14:03, 14 March 2008 (CDT)
:Well, I *mean* that the newspaper article says that it used CZ as a source for some of its info. The CZ article (written by me) was in existence before the newspaper article. I think it's permissible to mention this in *our* article, but maybe it isn't clear the way it stand now. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 14:24, 14 March 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 14:24, 14 March 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Official term for some public roads found only in Tucson, Arizona, that run diagonally rather than on the normal east-west or north-south grid of most of the city's roads. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Geography [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Referential loops

added info from a Tucson newspaper about stravenues -- the article mentions CZ as a source - aiee, feedback loop! :-) J. Noel Chiappa 14:03, 14 March 2008 (CDT)

Well, I *mean* that the newspaper article says that it used CZ as a source for some of its info. The CZ article (written by me) was in existence before the newspaper article. I think it's permissible to mention this in *our* article, but maybe it isn't clear the way it stand now. Hayford Peirce 14:24, 14 March 2008 (CDT)