Talk:Archive:Workgroup Weeks: Difference between revisions
imported>Robert W King (→What else: new section) |
imported>Larry Sanger |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
You know what else might be great? If we had a bot or something that once each week made a post on digg, or reddit, or any of these social networking services of the introduction paragraph to one of our approved articles. Maybe we can even include some kind of digg/reddit/delicious counter that updates in an html comment field in the page source so we know how many times it has been read. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 13:13, 24 April 2008 (CDT) | You know what else might be great? If we had a bot or something that once each week made a post on digg, or reddit, or any of these social networking services of the introduction paragraph to one of our approved articles. Maybe we can even include some kind of digg/reddit/delicious counter that updates in an html comment field in the page source so we know how many times it has been read. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 13:13, 24 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
Cool! Like, do it! --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 13:21, 24 April 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:21, 24 April 2008
Experts
I already whacked on CZ:Why should experts join CZ? a fair amount, so I have signed up for that. I could use some guidance on what else we need to say there, etc, etc. CZ Talk:Why should experts join CZ? awaits.... J. Noel Chiappa 19:46, 22 April 2008 (CDT)
Will do. --Larry Sanger 13:15, 23 April 2008 (CDT)
Eduzendium
I think we should probably be approaching departments or department heads to see if they're interested in the program. --Robert W King 12:21, 24 April 2008 (CDT)
Yes, I think that's an excellent idea, and Workgroup Weeks is the perfect time to raise the idea. --Larry Sanger 12:24, 24 April 2008 (CDT)
What else
You know what else might be great? If we had a bot or something that once each week made a post on digg, or reddit, or any of these social networking services of the introduction paragraph to one of our approved articles. Maybe we can even include some kind of digg/reddit/delicious counter that updates in an html comment field in the page source so we know how many times it has been read. --Robert W King 13:13, 24 April 2008 (CDT)
Cool! Like, do it! --Larry Sanger 13:21, 24 April 2008 (CDT)