Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- Starting text is lightly edited from 1911 Brittanica.66 bytes (8 words) - 06:35, 21 May 2008
- ...-Mountains/Geology Geology of the Appalachian Mountains] from Encyclopedia Brittanica online.153 bytes (17 words) - 14:21, 21 March 2023
- Took initially from Brittanica 1911, then found that that is largely taken from the preface to Maclaurin's194 bytes (27 words) - 15:53, 6 July 2008
- ...d love to just open a volume and start reading. We have a 1926 version of Brittanica, and it's a lot of fun to look up 'rocket' and 'computer'!960 bytes (159 words) - 04:33, 22 November 2023
- :: Did you get to take a look at the Encyclopedia Brittanica? I haven't gotten complete access yet. --[[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Inni4 KB (641 words) - 12:17, 13 May 2008
- * {{search link|Brittanica||ns0|ns14|ns100}} (Britannica)9 KB (1,181 words) - 17:32, 16 May 2010
- ...-Mountains/Geology Geology of the Appalachian Mountains] from Encyclopedia Brittanica online.5 KB (814 words) - 09:01, 9 August 2023
- ...e statement that 16 ounce make a pound (really!). Paper encyclopedias like Brittanica, Brockhaus, Larousse, Winkler-Prins, etc., rely on the expertise of the aut8 KB (1,481 words) - 05:06, 8 March 2024
- ...newtab">[https://www.britannica.com/biography/Theodor-Fontane Encyclopedia Brittanica on Theodor Fontane]</span>, last access 12/1/2020.</ref>. Several of these9 KB (1,296 words) - 12:36, 9 May 2023
- ...nergy Brittanica] has to say about energy. (Personally, I don't agree with Brittanica's statement ''All forms of energy are associated with motion''; Milton stat ...energy <-> force''. I checked a few more books and the 15th edition of the Brittanica. They all assume the concept "work" to be known by the reader). The second41 KB (6,781 words) - 10:05, 18 February 2023
- ==1911 Brittanica material==31 KB (5,302 words) - 03:10, 8 March 2024
- ...les written by [[Geoffrey Chaucer]] between 1387 and 1400<ref>Encyclopedia Brittanica (online) https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Canterbury-Tales, last access13 KB (2,007 words) - 07:33, 20 April 2024
- ...ough it is less comprehensive in its scope (trade-offs). The Encyclopedia Brittanica has a lede which is a model of clarity that all other dictionaries could le33 KB (5,394 words) - 19:19, 2 November 2009
- ...a later section? The latter makes me cringe. Would say "the Encyclopedia Brittanica"? Or "the Newsweek"? I didn't try to edit this page since I would expect i38 KB (6,130 words) - 05:06, 8 March 2024
- I'm pretty sure that I added a quote from the Brittanica to [[talk:Oxygen]] yesterday (about the chemical engineer Carl von Linde).63 KB (10,521 words) - 08:41, 23 February 2024
- * Is Outhgill in Yorkshire? (I saw two editions of Brittanica, both state that Faraday sr. came from Yorkshire, but fact is too unimporta55 KB (9,462 words) - 17:02, 5 March 2024
- ...i is used by a variety of other projects, and it's worth talking about the Brittanica-vs.-Wikipedia study; it's also worth mentioning some of the controversies (55 KB (8,985 words) - 10:42, 28 November 2016
- ...quantity and the quality has gone nowhere. Comparisons with Encyclopaedia Brittanica make it look good but every issue of EB is limited by publication dates and56 KB (8,699 words) - 19:01, 15 July 2011
- ...e the capability to have the page ''text'' say the exact same thing as the Brittanica entries - it's just that there will be the extra 'page name' prominently di ...supposition about "internal article names" was slap on. I just noticed you Brittanica links above, and Britannica's true 'page name' for the article about Charle141 KB (23,142 words) - 07:53, 2 March 2024
- ...aragraph as though it was an uncontested fact is POV and unacceptable. The Brittanica gets around that by prefacing its description with the phrase "In Christian72 KB (12,259 words) - 10:53, 7 September 2009