Forum Talk:Non-member Comments and Suggestions on Approvals: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pages: Content • Governance and Policy • Style • Management • Technical Issues • Requests for Help • Competitors and Press • Archived Boards
imported>Peter Jackson (→Names: new section) |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Names: thanks, Peter) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
In response to Hayford's question on the committee page, I've found [[CZ:Naming conventions]], but it doesn't say much. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter Jackson|talk]]) 10:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC) | In response to Hayford's question on the committee page, I've found [[CZ:Naming conventions]], but it doesn't say much. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter Jackson|talk]]) 10:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
:Thank you, Peter. I remember now looking at this page years ago. It does have a lot of useful info, but, as you say, it doesn't really address the question that I raised on the committee page. Maybe we Editors should discuss it and then, possibly, come to a decision about it. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] ([[User talk:Hayford Peirce|talk]]) 16:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:08, 20 January 2018
| Help system | All recent posts | Back to top | Contact Administrators | Archives |
|
Non-member Comments and Suggestions on Approvals Committee Members: for discussions, please use the forum. | ||||
Archives
none
What about review of CZ:Approval standards? If the/a purpose of the new approvals system is to encourage contributions by giving people something to aim at, that aim needs to be made as clear as possible. Peter Jackson (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, obviously *that* makes sense! Hayford Peirce (talk) 23:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Names
In response to Hayford's question on the committee page, I've found CZ:Naming conventions, but it doesn't say much. Peter Jackson (talk) 10:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, Peter. I remember now looking at this page years ago. It does have a lot of useful info, but, as you say, it doesn't really address the question that I raised on the committee page. Maybe we Editors should discuss it and then, possibly, come to a decision about it. Hayford Peirce (talk) 16:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC)