Forum Talk:Non-member Comments and Suggestions on Approvals: Difference between revisions
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Names: thanks, Peter) |
imported>John Stephenson (→Removing articles from the calls list: new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
In response to Hayford's question on the committee page, I've found [[CZ:Naming conventions]], but it doesn't say much. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter Jackson|talk]]) 10:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC) | In response to Hayford's question on the committee page, I've found [[CZ:Naming conventions]], but it doesn't say much. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter Jackson|talk]]) 10:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
:Thank you, Peter. I remember now looking at this page years ago. It does have a lot of useful info, but, as you say, it doesn't really address the question that I raised on the committee page. Maybe we Editors should discuss it and then, possibly, come to a decision about it. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] ([[User talk:Hayford Peirce|talk]]) 16:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC) | :Thank you, Peter. I remember now looking at this page years ago. It does have a lot of useful info, but, as you say, it doesn't really address the question that I raised on the committee page. Maybe we Editors should discuss it and then, possibly, come to a decision about it. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] ([[User talk:Hayford Peirce|talk]]) 16:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
== Removing articles from the calls list == | |||
See [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Talk%3ACowdray_House&diff=100856686&oldid=100856655 this edit]. You can take articles off the calls-for-approval list by changing the approvals template. This produces a [[:Category:ApprovalFailed|category of failures]]. If you look [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Template:ApprovalProcess&action=edit here] you can see the different template options. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] ([[User talk:John Stephenson|talk]]) 15:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:26, 22 January 2018
| Help system | All recent posts | Back to top | Contact Administrators | Archives |
|
Non-member Comments and Suggestions on Approvals Committee Members: for discussions, please use the forum. | ||||
What about review of CZ:Approval standards? If the/a purpose of the new approvals system is to encourage contributions by giving people something to aim at, that aim needs to be made as clear as possible. Peter Jackson (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, obviously *that* makes sense! Hayford Peirce (talk) 23:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Names
In response to Hayford's question on the committee page, I've found CZ:Naming conventions, but it doesn't say much. Peter Jackson (talk) 10:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, Peter. I remember now looking at this page years ago. It does have a lot of useful info, but, as you say, it doesn't really address the question that I raised on the committee page. Maybe we Editors should discuss it and then, possibly, come to a decision about it. Hayford Peirce (talk) 16:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Removing articles from the calls list
See this edit. You can take articles off the calls-for-approval list by changing the approvals template. This produces a category of failures. If you look here you can see the different template options. John Stephenson (talk) 15:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)