Civil society: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Roger A. Lohmann
(Complete rewrite and expansion of second paragraph eliminating most of Wikipedia copied material)
Line 5: Line 5:
== Origin ==
== Origin ==


The term is often traced to 18th century Scottish social philosopher [[Adam Ferguson]], who saw the development of a "commercial state" as a way to change the corrupt feudal order and strengthen the liberty of the individual.<ref> See [http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=1428 Adam Ferguson, An Essay on the History of Civil Society, 1767]<BR>
The term originated with [[Adam Ferguson]], an 18th century Scottish social philosopher usually identified as one of the [[Scottish moralists]], a group which also included [[Adam Smith]]. Ferguson saw the development of a [[commercial state]] as a way to change the corrupt feudal order and strengthen the liberty of the individual.<ref> See [http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=1428 Adam Ferguson, An Essay on the History of Civil Society, 1767] One of the impacts of his work was to provide a distinction of modern civil society and the medieval sacred society of Christendom<BR>
</ref> While Ferguson did not draw a line between the state and the society, [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]], the 19th  century German philosopher, made this distinction in his Elements of the Philosophy of Right.<ref> See [http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/pr/preface.htm G.W.F. Hegel, Philosophy of Right Hegel, 1827 (translated by Dyde, 1897)]</ref>. Hegel used the term "buergerliche Gesellschaft" though it is now referred to as Zivilgesellschaft in German to emphasize a more inclusive community. Hegel said civil society was a stage on the dialectical relationship between Hegel's perceived opposites, the macro-community of the state and the micro-community of the family. Broadly speaking, the term was split, like Hegel's followers, to the political left and right. On the left, it became the foundation for Karl Marx's bourgeois society; to the right it became a description for all non-state aspects of society, expanding out of the economic rigidity of Marxism into culture, society and politics. <ref> Pelczynski, 1984</ref>
</ref> While Ferguson did not draw a line between the state and the society, [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]], the 19th  century German philosopher, made this distinction in his Elements of the Philosophy of Right.<ref> See [http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/pr/preface.htm G.W.F. Hegel, Philosophy of Right Hegel, 1827 (translated by Dyde, 1897)]</ref>. Hegel used the term "bürgerliche Gesellschaft" . The German [[Zivilgesellschaft]]  emphasizes a more inclusive community than the state. Hegel viewed civil society dialectically along with the state and the [[family]] or [[household]] (sometimes broadened today as the [[intimate sphere]]. This Hegelian trichotomy is echoed in contemporary calls for a [[Third Way]] as well as contemporary conceptions of the [[third sector]]. Subsequent interpretations of civil society by left- and right-Hegelians differed substantially. Karl Marx's critique of [[bourgeois society]]  rendered the term a weapon in the Marxist critique of all non-state aspects of society, economy and polity. <ref> See Pelczynski, 1984</ref> On the other side, civil society joined with a neo-[[Tocquevillian]] view of voluntary associations became the basis of contemporary conceptions of a [[third sector]] between [[market]] and [[state]]. Geo-political events, including the decline of military dictatorships in Latin America and the collapse of the Soviet Empire in Europe are usually credited with a tremendous increase of interest in civil society in the 1990s.


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 07:11, 20 July 2007

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
Timelines [?]
Debate Guide [?]
Researchers and theorists [?]
 
This editable Main Article has an approved citable version (see its Citable Version subpage). While we have done conscientious work, we cannot guarantee that this Main Article, or its citable version, is wholly free of mistakes. By helping to improve this editable Main Article, you will help the process of generating a new, improved citable version.

Civil society refers to the arena of uncoerced collective action around shared interests, purposes and values. In theory, its institutional forms are distinct from those of the state, family and market, though in practice, the boundaries between state, civil society, family and market are often complex, blurred and negotiated. Civil society commonly embraces a diversity of spaces, actors and institutional forms, varying in their degree of formality, autonomy and power. Civil societies are often populated by organisations such as registered charities, development non-governmental organisations, community groups, women's organisations, faith-based organisations, professional associations, trade unions, self-help groups, social movements, business associations, coalitions and advocacy groups.[1]

Origin

The term originated with Adam Ferguson, an 18th century Scottish social philosopher usually identified as one of the Scottish moralists, a group which also included Adam Smith. Ferguson saw the development of a commercial state as a way to change the corrupt feudal order and strengthen the liberty of the individual.[2] While Ferguson did not draw a line between the state and the society, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, the 19th century German philosopher, made this distinction in his Elements of the Philosophy of Right.[3]. Hegel used the term "bürgerliche Gesellschaft" . The German Zivilgesellschaft emphasizes a more inclusive community than the state. Hegel viewed civil society dialectically along with the state and the family or household (sometimes broadened today as the intimate sphere. This Hegelian trichotomy is echoed in contemporary calls for a Third Way as well as contemporary conceptions of the third sector. Subsequent interpretations of civil society by left- and right-Hegelians differed substantially. Karl Marx's critique of bourgeois society rendered the term a weapon in the Marxist critique of all non-state aspects of society, economy and polity. [4] On the other side, civil society joined with a neo-Tocquevillian view of voluntary associations became the basis of contemporary conceptions of a third sector between market and state. Geo-political events, including the decline of military dictatorships in Latin America and the collapse of the Soviet Empire in Europe are usually credited with a tremendous increase of interest in civil society in the 1990s.

References

  1. What is civil society?. Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics (2004-03-01). Retrieved on 2007-7-18.
  2. See Adam Ferguson, An Essay on the History of Civil Society, 1767 One of the impacts of his work was to provide a distinction of modern civil society and the medieval sacred society of Christendom
  3. See G.W.F. Hegel, Philosophy of Right Hegel, 1827 (translated by Dyde, 1897)
  4. See Pelczynski, 1984