Talk:Coriolis force: Difference between revisions
imported>John R. Brews (Rotating Earth) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→Presentation/formatting: new section) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Rotating Earth== | ==Rotating Earth== | ||
Contributed by myself in June 2008, for example, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coriolis_effect&diff=218224145&oldid=218221895 here] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coriolis_effect&diff=218199099&oldid=218197139 here], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coriolis_effect&diff=219110044&oldid=219105420 added Limerick]. Figure also mine, as indicated on its Notes page. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 19:07, 5 March 2011 (UTC) | Contributed by myself in June 2008, for example, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coriolis_effect&diff=218224145&oldid=218221895 here] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coriolis_effect&diff=218199099&oldid=218197139 here], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coriolis_effect&diff=219110044&oldid=219105420 added Limerick]. Figure also mine, as indicated on its Notes page. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 19:07, 5 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Presentation/formatting == | |||
I made no text changes, but I did some formatting changes that I thought might make the article a little more welcoming. My experience is that long initial paragraphs containing many special characters, or even wikilinks, can be daunting, so I inserted some paragraph breaks. | |||
For the record, I am viewing this in Firefox. Not all browsers will react identically to the formatting. | |||
You had a great quotation well down in the article, which I think does very nicely in the lead. | |||
Again, you had fine illustrations later in the article, so I more or less randomly moved one to the intro. | |||
I also changed the references to two-column format. Different authors have different preferences and there's no hard rule, but I tend to like to go to two-column once I have perhaps four or more footnotes. | |||
Now, I shall read for content and flow. | |||
If I am not too irreverent, a text box, early in the article, perhaps commenting on the legendary changes in the pattern of water going down a drink in opposite hemispheres, and if it goes straight down ON the equator, might be fun and illustrative. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:18, 17 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:18, 17 March 2011
The mathematical background subsection of the rotating carousel example was contributed by myself to Wikipedia in a series of edits in June 2008, this edit close to its completion, and this edit close to the beginning. John R. Brews 17:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Rotating carousel example
This description needs more work. I have taken it to my user page. John R. Brews 20:25, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Reinstatement of carousel example
The math from Wikipedia assumed the ball was tossed from the center of the carousel to the periphery, while the example here is from edge to another point on the edge. The math has been fixed to correspond to this case. A spreadsheet calculation shows the radius of the circular path varies by a few percent or less, while the speed around the path varies by about twenty percent or less. John R. Brews 17:00, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Rotating Earth
Contributed by myself in June 2008, for example, here here, added Limerick. Figure also mine, as indicated on its Notes page. John R. Brews 19:07, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Presentation/formatting
I made no text changes, but I did some formatting changes that I thought might make the article a little more welcoming. My experience is that long initial paragraphs containing many special characters, or even wikilinks, can be daunting, so I inserted some paragraph breaks.
For the record, I am viewing this in Firefox. Not all browsers will react identically to the formatting.
You had a great quotation well down in the article, which I think does very nicely in the lead.
Again, you had fine illustrations later in the article, so I more or less randomly moved one to the intro.
I also changed the references to two-column format. Different authors have different preferences and there's no hard rule, but I tend to like to go to two-column once I have perhaps four or more footnotes.
Now, I shall read for content and flow.
If I am not too irreverent, a text box, early in the article, perhaps commenting on the legendary changes in the pattern of water going down a drink in opposite hemispheres, and if it goes straight down ON the equator, might be fun and illustrative. Howard C. Berkowitz 21:18, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Physics Category Check
- Mathematics Category Check
- Engineering Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Physics Developing Articles
- Physics Nonstub Articles
- Physics Internal Articles
- Mathematics Developing Articles
- Mathematics Nonstub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles
- Engineering Developing Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles
- Physics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Mathematics Underlinked Articles
- Engineering Underlinked Articles