Talk:Poverty and obesity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Helen Golz No edit summary |
imported>Gareth Leng No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
[[User:Helen Golz|Helen Golz]] 15:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC) | [[User:Helen Golz|Helen Golz]] 15:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
Is there a better title for this? Poverty-induced obesity or relationship between poverty and obesity? ([[User:Chunbum Park|Chunbum Park]] 00:59, 28 September 2011 (UTC)) | |||
:Possibly, we'll see how the article develops and consider nrenaming later.[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 09:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
[[User:Hannah Harman|Hannah Harman]] 10:25, 4 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
[[User:Ross McEwan|Ross McEwan]] 18:02, 10 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
Hi, good selection of references, great start. | |||
[[User:Nancy Sabatier|Nancy Sabatier]] 12:22, 11 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
Good work, the subject has been well covered. Remember to proof read (there are some repetitions and lack of clarity at times), to enter your references properly, and include your figures. [[User:Nancy Sabatier|Nancy Sabatier]] 11:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
:This has come together well; it reads clearly, is well referenced and reads as a scholarly evidence-based overview, and you've largely avoided the risk of glib and folksy "common sense". well done.[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 17:39, 30 November 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:39, 30 November 2011
Helen Golz 15:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Is there a better title for this? Poverty-induced obesity or relationship between poverty and obesity? (Chunbum Park 00:59, 28 September 2011 (UTC))
- Possibly, we'll see how the article develops and consider nrenaming later.Gareth Leng 09:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Hannah Harman 10:25, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Ross McEwan 18:02, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, good selection of references, great start. Nancy Sabatier 12:22, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Good work, the subject has been well covered. Remember to proof read (there are some repetitions and lack of clarity at times), to enter your references properly, and include your figures. Nancy Sabatier 11:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- This has come together well; it reads clearly, is well referenced and reads as a scholarly evidence-based overview, and you've largely avoided the risk of glib and folksy "common sense". well done.Gareth Leng 17:39, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Biology Category Check
- Health Sciences Category Check
- Eduzendium Category Check
- Stub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Biology Stub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Stub Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- Eduzendium Stub Articles
- Eduzendium Internal Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Health Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Eduzendium Underlinked Articles