Talk:Cleveland, England: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Alexander J Bateman
No edit summary
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


:I just followed the Link from the Page on [[Yorkshire]], I agree that it seems an odd choice for the dominant article and as it is not crrently part of Yorkshire, [[Cleveland, England]] would seem to make the most sense?. --[[User:Alexander J Bateman|Alexander J Bateman]] 15:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
:I just followed the Link from the Page on [[Yorkshire]], I agree that it seems an odd choice for the dominant article and as it is not crrently part of Yorkshire, [[Cleveland, England]] would seem to make the most sense?. --[[User:Alexander J Bateman|Alexander J Bateman]] 15:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
::Yes, I agree.  Well, just use the "Move" button then. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 18:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:24, 31 December 2008

Hi Alexander! Welcome to Citizendium!

As you surely know, there is a perhaps better-known (and much more populous) Cleveland, namely Cleveland, Ohio. No offense, but I think even President Grover Cleveland is better-known than County Cleveland.

How about we create a disambiguation page on Cleveland and move the present Cleveland article to Cleveland, England or Cleveland, Yorkshire or whatever you think appropriate? --Larry Sanger 15:21, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

I just followed the Link from the Page on Yorkshire, I agree that it seems an odd choice for the dominant article and as it is not crrently part of Yorkshire, Cleveland, England would seem to make the most sense?. --Alexander J Bateman 15:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I agree. Well, just use the "Move" button then. --Larry Sanger 18:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)