User:Howard C. Berkowitz/ToDo: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
Line 50: Line 50:
*[[Combat engineer]]
*[[Combat engineer]]
*[[Cavalry]]
*[[Cavalry]]
*[[Ocean escort]]
*[[Ocean escort]] Not happy with this.
*[[Convoy]]
*[[Convoy]]
 
===Air defense===
Getting interested now, with [[counter-rocket, artillery and mortar]] as a new mission, as well as things like the ADAM cell for deconfliction. Still sorting out the C3I-ISR, especially which systems connect to [[JTIDS]], which to [[Global Information Grid]], or stay in things like [[FAAD]]
===Military History===
===Military History===
*write [[Operation LINEBACKER II]]; replace existing text in [[Vietnam War]]
*write [[Operation LINEBACKER II]]; replace existing text in [[Vietnam War]]
Line 58: Line 59:
*Think more about WWII air war
*Think more about WWII air war
*Think about getting the multiple coverage of the sub-battles of the [[Battle of Leyte Gulf]] straightened out, so it's possible, for example, to have a consistent wikilink to the best coverage of the [[Battle of Surigao Strait]] or the [[Action off Samar]]/[[Battle of San Bernadino Strait]] (and get a standard name for it)
*Think about getting the multiple coverage of the sub-battles of the [[Battle of Leyte Gulf]] straightened out, so it's possible, for example, to have a consistent wikilink to the best coverage of the [[Battle of Surigao Strait]] or the [[Action off Samar]]/[[Battle of San Bernadino Strait]] (and get a standard name for it)
*Try to recruit a Canadian for [[Battle of Vimy Ridge]], but at least link the Vimy [[counterbattery material]] (also tie to [[C-RAM]] [[Counter-Rocket, Artillery and Mortar]] ''Forum question about naming convention'' into [[First World War]], and be sure it's linked into [[Artillery]]
*Try to recruit a Canadian for [[Battle of Vimy Ridge]], but at least link the Vimy counterbattery sensors. Generally need article on [[counterbattery]].
**[[Battle of Vimy Ridge]]
**[[Arthur Currie]]
**[[Andrew McNaughton]]
**[[Dieppe raid]] ([[Operation JUBILEE]])
**[[Harry Crerar]]
**[[Romeo Dallaire]] (might have a Topic Informant)
*Again, try to recruit Commonwealth person, but [[Battle of Gallipoli]] (Gallipoli campaign?) under [[Dardanelles campaign]] (as well as equivalent "battle" subarticle for naval attempt to force the straits)
*Again, try to recruit Commonwealth person, but [[Battle of Gallipoli]] (Gallipoli campaign?) under [[Dardanelles campaign]] (as well as equivalent "battle" subarticle for naval attempt to force the straits)
===Canadiana category===
*[[Battle of Vimy Ridge]]
*[[Arthur Currie]]
*[[Andrew McNaughton]]
*[[Dieppe raid]] ([[Operation JUBILEE]])
*[[Harry Crerar]]
*[[Romeo Dallaire]] (might have a Topic Informant)

Revision as of 13:17, 9 October 2008

Yes, I know I should use the workgroup status system. It hates me. I can write articles faster than put them into a plan.


Computers

Meta-articles

I see a need for a set of capstone/core/meta-articles that are below the level of "Computers", although they perhaps do belong on the Workgroup page. These go under the heading "Networking". I'm debating whether other than IP networking is still relevant; my thought is that some PSTN and probably SS7 material is appropriate.

There is "transmission stuff" that needs to be in there, which, with GMPLS, constrained link state routing for optical networks, etc., perhaps needs a meta-article talking about recovery frameworks, starting with MPLS and SONET-NGS, and branching from there. A good cellular person could help, as well as someone more RF-expert.

DNS

Security

IPv6

Continue work on Internet Protocol version 6, which also interlaces with the preceding three subjects. Create articles, or at least stubs, where I have expertise; try to recruit authors to work on gaps, or just to offload.

Routing

Health sciences and healing arts

Catalog, perhaps, of interdisciplinary medical subspecialties?

Military

Military skills/branches/operational techniques/major platforms

The U.S. Army is getting remarkably silly about security. I can find detailed operating manuals for tanks, but every formal definition of the Armor Branch (i.e., responsible for tanks and other such vehicles) is behind a security portal.

Air defense

Getting interested now, with counter-rocket, artillery and mortar as a new mission, as well as things like the ADAM cell for deconfliction. Still sorting out the C3I-ISR, especially which systems connect to JTIDS, which to Global Information Grid, or stay in things like FAAD

Military History