Talk:NMR spectroscopy/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David E. Volk
(How to remove approval that I never gave in the first place??)
imported>Paul Wormer
(→‎Way to go.: new section)
Line 24: Line 24:
I have no idea why the article says I nonimated it for approval.  I have not even read it through yet.
I have no idea why the article says I nonimated it for approval.  I have not even read it through yet.
Any help appreciated removing the approval. [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 16:38, 16 January 2008 (CST)
Any help appreciated removing the approval. [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 16:38, 16 January 2008 (CST)
== Way to go. ==
I see that the article is developing nicely, keep up the good work.--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 11:03, 19 January 2008 (CST)

Revision as of 12:03, 19 January 2008

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
Advanced [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The use of electromagnetic radiation, in the presence of a magnetic field, to obtain information regarding transitions between different nuclear spin states of the nuclei present in the sample of interest. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Chemistry, Physics and Biology [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive 1  English language variant American English

Formatting

Hello,

Does the formatting look fine? As you can see by clicking the history tab, and the compare button, one needs to put titles between "==" to have them appear in the Table of contents. If you wish to make subsections, just use "===" and even "====". However, Citizendium disapproves excessively "modular" articles (with many subsections), and prefers lively narratives, but I can see that you are certainly not going in that direction (the excessively modular approach)! If I can help in any way (I'm just an author, however), please let me know by clicking my user name and then the "discussion" tab, where you can "edit" at the bottom of the page.

I removed your signature from the article, because those who wish to know who has been working on a given page normally click on the "history" button. I will now create redirect pages, which will enable users to access this page using the different abbreviations and alternate names you provide.

Pierre-Alain Gouanvic 11:56, 12 January 2008 (CST)

Some formatting pointers

Dear dr. Talluri, welcome again. I hope that you will contribute more articles of the same quality. I understand that you don't have any wiki experience yet. Therefore I mention a few things:

The wiki software knows LaTeX enclosed between <math> ... </math> An indented new paragraph is started by a colon (:),

like this. Hence indented math uses   :<math> ... </math>

As in printed text (in journals etc.) emphasis is done by italics, not by capitals (and also not by underlining). Wikilinks are done as [[NMR spectroscopy]] and give NMR spectroscopy.

If you don't want to be bothered by these finicky details, don't worry, others (including myself) will fix it. It is more important that you share your knowledge and expertise with us than that the format is perfect. --Paul Wormer 03:32, 13 January 2008 (CST)

I didn't nominate for approval, but it says i did

I have no idea why the article says I nonimated it for approval. I have not even read it through yet. Any help appreciated removing the approval. David E. Volk 16:38, 16 January 2008 (CST)

Way to go.

I see that the article is developing nicely, keep up the good work.--Paul Wormer 11:03, 19 January 2008 (CST)