User talk:John J. Dennehy: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "CZ:Nomination page" to "Archive:Citizendium Ballot for the Management Council")
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Some workgroup help==
== Student microbe list? ==
{{workgroup introduction}}


== Welcome ==
I cannot get an image of an ''E. coli'' bacillus filling out the College Boards with a very small #2 pencil in each flagellum. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 22:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)


If I you need help, leave a messaqge on my talk page. I'll try. Regards, [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 12:18, 27 April 2007 (CDT)
== [[Example microbe]] ==


Wonderful to see you at work, so quickly. [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 15:27, 27 April 2007 (CDT)
Hi John,
I took the liberty to adapt the formatting a bit, to facilitate maintenance of these articles here at CZ. I filled the {{tl|EZnotice}} fields with placeholders, please replace these with the correct information. If you have questions or need assistance with the formatting of the course pages, please let me know. Cheers, --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 15:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
:Please take a look at [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php?topic=2597.new this forum thread] and comment. Thanks! --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 12:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
::Please also take a look at [[Special:WhatLinksHere/CZ:Biol_201:_General_Microbiology/EZnotice]] (e.g. [[Naegleria fowleri]]) and revert or modify [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=CZ:Biol_201:_General_Microbiology/EZnotice&curid=100102915&diff=100462198&oldid=100462192 this edit] once you're done. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 14:56, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


== Image problem ==
== FYI ==


{{badimage}} [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 20:14, 27 April 2007 (CDT)
I made [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=CZ%3AStudent_Microbe_list&diff=100465435&oldid=100465434 this] change to reflect the new account that she now uses. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 19:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
:Thanks you've been a great help![[User:John J. Dennehy|John J. Dennehy]] 22:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


==Hellow==
==What is a micriobe?==
Hi John, good to see you trying this out on the class again. I'd be interested to know the feed back you are getting from the students. As an aside, what is the definition you use for a microbe?  I notice that a few of your students are choosing mushrooms and one even has C. elegans.  Is that pushing the threshold on the size side, or is that within the current usage? [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 19:37, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
:OK, I answered my own question. http://www.microbeworld.org/know/largest.aspx They're bigger than I thought. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 19:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
::Hi Chris, I will probably create a page asking students to write a bit about their experience. It would be great to get some first hand feedback. As far as what is a microbe, definitions are often hard to pin down in biology. Biological systems often fall along continuums rather than discrete black/white categories. The classic definition is single-celled organisms not visible to the naked eye, but as you can see what that entails is quite expansive. I'm keeping a rather broad perspective, and fungi and C. elegans are acceptable. [[User:John J. Dennehy|John J. Dennehy]] 22:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


Another microbiologist-geneticist. Fabulous. Welcome to the wiki. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 19:32, 27 April 2007 (CDT)
== please consider approving the affiliation between the Biology Workgroup and Microbiology subgroup ==


Yup. I'm him. G M O Pundit hisself. Ill check out Your blog now. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 20:02, 27 April 2007 (CDT)
Apparently, I need an editor to say that the biology workgroup can be "affiliated" with the Microbiology subgroup which I have created. Please consider saying this is ok as a biology editor.  I also created an Infectious Disease subgroup, which I think will have different goals compared to a microbiology subgroup, and you can consider approving that as well for the biology affiliation if you would like. Some people will argue it is redundant, I don't think it is. [[User:Tom Kelly|Tom Kelly]] 06:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
:http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Category_talk:Biology_Affiliated_Subgroups


ooooh. Cooool. Evilutery biology and phages. Cut my teeth on Mu and P1 and upside down Y. Reading quite a bit about phage ( eg Villareal). Got student's writing stuff on cyanophage, and cre-lox as we type. Ill link to your blog  from my teaching websites. Microbe Pundit and a Microbes Wiki! ( the second hidden within the entrails of a University server).
::Of course! Where should I put my approval? The talk page? Also the vast majority of microbes are non pathogenic so it is entirely appropriate that there be a distinction between microbiology and infectious diseases. [[User:John J. Dennehy|John J. Dennehy]] 13:11, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


I basically wrote [[Horizontal gene transfer in prokaryotes]] but it really needs more work. But it does have a pic of Joshua L. I teach a course in Microbial Cell biology too. looking forward to your activites [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 20:09, 27 April 2007 (CDT)
:::Given the number of elected pathogens, should the Politics workgroup sign off on Infectious Disease? :-) [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 14:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


:: Are you THE phage in a test tube evolution guys?  I glanced at one of those papers once. I heard Josh talk once in Madison Wisconsin. Agressively confident and lucid. Gotta go now [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 20:27, 27 April 2007 (CDT)
== BW-related articles ==


::::Couln't resist checking out your CZ phage page. I teach with Mike Dyall-Smith who's into phages of halobacteria, and has just come back from a meeting near Nice, where there was talk about phage therapy moving forward [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 20:33, 27 April 2007 (CDT).
Taking the defined articles from [[Select Agent Program/Agents]], I tried to make them consistent with the new subgroups for microbiology and infectious disease. Tentativelly, I added the Military subgroup since these are organisms with declared biological warfare potential; I have not yet so changed the templates to include the additional organisms in [[CDC Bioterrorism Agents-Disease list]], but will do so if there is consensus.
:::: Mike just sent me a photo of Steve A. coming out of the house they shared at the Nice conference. Small World. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 07:01, 30 April 2007 (CDT)


== Images ==
The Military assignment is a separate argument from Microbiology and Infectious Disease.


Hello Dr. Dennehy. I am glad to make your acquaintance.  Please do us a favor and revisit the upload pages of the following images you recently uploaded:
Would you consider it worth making it a priority, to assist your Eduzendium project, if I returned to build out [[biological weapon]]?


*[[:Image:Phage_lifecycle.gif]]
[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 18:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Lambda.jpg]]
*[[:Image:T-_4_Phage.gif]]
*[[:Image:Phage.gif]]


They are lacking licensing/copyright data. For help, see [[Help:Images#Copyrights]].  For further help, just ask me on my talk page. Thanks, [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 23:46, 29 April 2007 (CDT)
== A brief tutorial into CZ ==


:Let me know at any time if you wish help in uploading and documenting images. Regrettably, undocumented images cannot long stay on the wiki. We need at minimum to know their source and licensing and have that documented on the image upload page. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 04:46, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
Hi John,
please take a look at the following series of edits I made to explain the workings of CZ to one of your students.
# [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Vibrio_fischeri&curid=100105432&diff=100473528&oldid=100473527 preparation of article]
# [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Template:Vibrio_fischeri/Metadata&curid=100105433&action=history create the article's metadata]
# [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Talk:Vibrio_fischeri&curid=100105434&action=history create the article's talk page]
# [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Vibrio_fischeri&curid=100105432&diff=100473531&oldid=100473528 start adding content]
# [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Vibrio_fischeri&curid=100105432&diff=100473532&oldid=100473531 link your article to other articles via intrawiki links]
# [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Vibrio_fischeri/Related_Articles&curid=100105435&action=history put your article in context via the Related Articles subpage]  
# [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=CZ:Start_Article&curid=100010555&action=history clean up any earlier tries that did not work out]
# [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Brochothrix_thermosphacta&diff=prev&oldid=100462100 if the course is over, remove the EZ notice]


==Suggestion==
I hope these may be useful for others.
Im sure that youll want to get your phage article approved in the near future. Dont hang back, and as soon as you feel like it give me a call via my user page and Ill help ush it through the system.
[[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 01:29, 16 May 2007 (CDT)


Probably need to first find a phage image to replave the lambda one some darn constBLE HAS PULLED OUT GIVING RED LINKS. hAVE YOU ANY? (OOOPS)[[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 15:03, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
Cheers, --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 14:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Daniel


Now I was trying to be as nice as I could about it. :-)  ---[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 18:20, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
:I'd add that metadata can be complex from the beginner; I and others would be happy to help set up that CZ overhead. Errors in metadata can have effects in other places in the Wiki, so if help is needed, a note on a user page, an email to constables@citizendium.org, etc., can get help. I've been creating some. As I mentioned, it may also be helpful for CZ regulars to add to Related Articles, as they may know what is already here, naming conventions, etc. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 17:18, 11 April 2009 (UTC)


==phage==
==You've been Nominated!==
In Phage I was thinkin g that some mention of phage display and panning techniques would be good in other uses. Its m13 or fi pgage they use there isnt it [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 15:59, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
Someone has nominated you for a position in the new Citizendium. They have noticed you're dedication to the project and like what they see.  To be listed on the ballot for the position, it is necessary that you accept the nomination on the [[Archive:Citizendium Ballot for the Management Council|Nomination page].  Just place accept next to your name along with the four tildes. The nomination period will close at midnight October 7 (UTC).  Article 54 of the new charter details the requirements:


OK. Lets Roll. Ill propose it for Approval, and we can fight out the minor grammat tweeking and other quibbles over the next week. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 18:01, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
===Article 54===


(Dont forget to use you 4~s) [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 18:01, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
*In conjunction with the Declaration of the Editor-in-Chief regarding the effectivity of this Charter, there shall be a call for nominations for the following offices: Managament Council (five seats), Editorial Council (seven seats), Managing Editor (one), Ombudsman (one).  This shall be the effective date of the Charter.
*Any Citizen may nominate candidates for these positions. 
*Nominations shall be collected and collated by the Chief Constable.
*Nominations shall be accepted no more than fourteen days after the effective date of the charter; the ballot shall be available starting on the twentieth day after the effective date  of the charter; the election shall be completed no more than twenty-eight days after the effective date of the charter; all elected officials shall begin their term of office on the thirtieth day after the effective date of the charter. 
*Only candidates who accept their nomination shall be eligible to appear on the ballot. Nominated candidates can accept nominations for no more than two official functions.  Accepting a nomination serves as a declaration of commitment, in the case of being elected, to fulfill this function until the limit of the term.
*All positions shall be elected by a simple majority of the voting citizenry. In the case of a tie, an immediate run-off election shall be held.
*In the event that a candidate has been elected for two functions, the candidate shall declare which one he or she accepts within three days of announcement of the election results. In the event that such a declaration has not been made during this period, the candidate shall be considered elected for the position for which the nomination was accepted first. The same procedure applies to a reserve member that becomes elected by a seat being vacated this way.


If you would like to make a statement to help voters, click the "Statement" link to the right of your name. 


orright its up. Expect a week of annoying but useful comments (but quite likely there's only 5 people who can say much). The people who know little are most helpful. They (plus Nancy) point out the jargon and fine clarity issues. I've stood back, as proir to this being a significant contributor would hamper me being seen as being at a distance, but I might now try and find glitches if I can. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 18:12, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
Thanks again for the commitment you're making to assure that Citizendium becomes the premier quality online source we all have envisioned.  


Thx David, my first CZ article out for peer review!
[[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 13:01, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


== Returning to Citizendium: an update on the project and how to get involved ==


==Plaques==
Hello - some time ago you became part of the Citizendium project, but we haven't seen you around for a while. Perhaps you'd like to update your [[User:John J. Dennehy|public biography]] or check on the progress of [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/John_J._Dennehy any pages you've edited so far].
Just realised it would be nice to have some plaquues in the Phage article. Mike Dyall Smith has an image of his, and Ive just emailed his for permission to use it. But if you have one it would be good to load it up. Not essential, of course, but nice.


cheers David [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 03:48, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
Citizendium now has over [[:Category:CZ Live|16,000 articles]], with more than [[:Category:Approved Articles|150 approved]] by specialist [[CZ:The Editor Role|Editors]] such as yourself, but our contributor numbers require a boost. We have an initiative called '[[CZ:Eduzendium|Eduzendium]]' that brings in students enrolled on university courses to write articles for credit, but we still need more Editors across the community to write, discuss and approve material. There are some [[:Category:Biology_Developed_Articles|developed Biology articles]] that could be improved and approved, and some [[CZ:Biology_Workgroup#High_priority_articles|high-priority articles]] that we don't have yet. You can also create new articles via [[CZ:Start_Article|this guide]], and contribute to some Biology pages that have been [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Special:RecentChangesLinked&target=Category%3ABiology_tag recently edited] - or to [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges any others] on Citizendium, since you're a general [[CZ:The Author Role|Author]] as well as a specialist Editor. You may like to contribute to discussions in the [http://forum.citizendium.org forums], and might consider running for an elected position on the [[CZ:Management Council|Management]] and [http://ec.citizendium.org Editorial] Councils that oversee the project.


Mike's Image is of halophage. Hmmm. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 06:36, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
If you have any questions, let me know via my [[User talk:John Stephenson|Talk page]] or by leaving a message below this one. Thank you for signing up and reading this update; I hope that you will [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Special:UserLogin&returnto=Special:MyTalk look in] on our community soon. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 13:11, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 
==cochlear hearing aid==
really interesting! thanks for showing me. [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 18:51, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
 
==Favor to ask-imprtant==
John I have nominated DNA for approval- it needs a lot of work. Could you kindly help me? [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 12:35, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
 
 
 
== DNA ==
 
I just wanted to let you know some other authors and editors were working on another version of the DNA article.  I linked it from the main article.  I think their comments can be tracked via the forums and the talk pages. [[User:Tom Kelly|Tom Kelly]] 22:30, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
 
I had no idea that there were two articles, there should never be a draft article of anything but an approved article. Here is a message I have put on other talk pages:there is a [[DNA/Draft]] and a [[DNA]]. The system of draft articles is strictly to allow for unprotected versions of approved articles to keep going on the wiki. Now, there are two different DNA articles, and -it's a mess. Please help, we need to put recent edits from DNA into DNA/draft and get rid of the title DNA/draft by moving the article DNA/draft to DNA. If you ever notice an author making a draft article of an unapproved article please stop them. In this case, we could have had no problem by just having named DNA draft DNA in the first place. Anyway, please help? [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 11:04, 9 June 2007 (CDT)
 
==Felx d'Herelle==
Ive read the draft with interest. It looks ready to nominate for approval to me, which I will do if you indicate that your ready for that. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 14:50, 17 June 2007 (CDT)
 
::I've been polishing this along with struggling with DNA. It could use a little more polish, but I was going to ask you to put it up for approval. Looks like you were thinking the same thing. [[User:John J. Dennehy|John J. Dennehy]] 16:39, 17 June 2007 (CDT)
 
== [[Antibacterial]] ==
 
This page appears to be a copy and paste of Wikipedia's article [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiseptic antiseptic]. When importing articles from Wikipedia, please follow [[CZ:How to convert Wikipedia articles to Citizendium articles]] and copy the source, not the display, to avoid the many problems currently evident in the article. Please work on this article soon. [[User:James A. Flippin|James A. Flippin]] 14:19, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
 
I see that you have done the same with [[Germ theory of disease]], [[Cholera]], [[Habitats]], [[Ganges]], [[Jumna]], and [[Enzyme]]. These all need to be significantly improved soon or they will be put up for deletion. [[User:James A. Flippin|James A. Flippin]] 15:42, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
 
== Importing Wikipedia Articles ==
 
When importing articles from Wikipedia, please click on "edit this page" at Wikipedia and copy and paste the wiki code from the edit box into Citizendium. This preserves the formatting, such as bolding, sectioning, references, etc. and makes the pages much easier to work on later. [[User:James A. Flippin|James A. Flippin]] 18:35, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
 
James, we might have to go back and get the June 15th version.  It seems that the editors at WP were deleting content and that is why John imported them quickly.  Any chance you can help do that? --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 18:54, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
 
Actually, John, maybe there are better versions than the 15th.  I.e. for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki?title=Germ_theory_of_disease&action=history Germ theory of disease] there may be a version that you want before they started to mess with it.  Do you see one? --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 19:38, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
 
:I'm certainly willing to help him go through the histories at Wikipedia and import the versions he likes best, but I have no way to gauge which version should be imported. John, please contact me on my [[User talk:James A. Flippin|talk page]] or [[Special:Emailuser/James_A._Flippin|e-mail me]] if you'd like my help. [[User:James A. Flippin|James A. Flippin]] 19:49, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
 
==Inclined?==
I placed To approve tags on both Twort and D'Herelle. Ive actually read Martin Arrowsmith a looong time ago. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 23:42, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
 
== [[Frederick Twort]] ==
 
Congratulations on your good work!  It was my pleasure approving that one.  Keep going!! --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 21:03, 25 June 2007 (CDT)
 
== Wiki Research ==
Thanks for your completed survey. [[User:James Sutton|James Sutton]] 08:47, 26 June 2007 (CDT)
 
==DNA again==
 
Ive dropped a note at Chris Day proposing to approve DNA. If three of us say yes, we could get it approved. What do you say? [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 19:35, 1 July 2007 (CDT)
 
:I'm with you David. I read it this morning and it is looking very nice. [[User:John J. Dennehy|John J. Dennehy]] 08:16, 2 July 2007 (CDT)
==DNA==
I slapped "Nancy" 's To approve back on [[DNA]]. Please advise if there is dissent. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 02:46, 6 July 2007 (CDT)
 
== Ganges ==
Dear John J. Dennehy, I came across your article about [[Ganges]] when preparing a set of articles on European rivers, and I have moved it to [[Ganges River]] (a redirection remained at [[Ganges]]). This is because a general agreement is being formed that river articles should include the word river in their titles. The reason is that very often other geographical and other terms are named after rivers, and such agreement can save us some work and confusion. For more information, you can refer to  [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/User_talk:Igor_Gre%C5%A1ovnik#River_names this Section] on my talk page. In other respects, the article has not been modified. Best Regards, [[User:Igor Grešovnik|Igor Grešovnik]] 12:06, 17 January 2008 (CST)
 
== Eduzedium template ==
 
Hi, I was somewhat bold and went ahead and added instructions to your class page about how your students ca put a template at the head of their articles which will mark them as an Eduzendium effort, and also stop other editors/authors from fiddling with them while your students are working on them. I hope I haven't offended by doing that directly, as opposed to just telling you how to do it. If so, sorry, just trying to be efficiet! [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 09:46, 10 March 2008 (CDT)
 
: Thanks! much appreciated --[[User:John J. Dennehy|John J. Dennehy]] 09:50, 10 March 2008 (CDT)
 
:: You're welcome, glad to be of asssistance! [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 10:12, 10 March 2008 (CDT)
 
== Article name consistency? ==
 
Could you make sure your students are naming things consistently? Some are using caps on both words in the organism name, one named their article [[Hepatitis C Virus]] (capital V) which I'm pretty sure is not right, etc. Typos inside the article aren't too hard to fix, but article names are a bit more of a pain... Thanks! [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 08:19, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
 
: OK Ill try!--[[User:John J. Dennehy|John J. Dennehy]] 08:27, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
 
:: Here's another one: we have both [[Human papilloma virus (HPV)]] and [[Human Papilloma virus]] (the latter being a student article) - and no [[Human papilloma virus]]! Sigh, article should probably be at the last, and all the others redirect to it. Let me know if you want me to get that all straight. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 23:23, 13 March 2008 (CDT)
 
:::Early on I tried with a few others to help create a system to avoid this, along with the general disorganization and inconsistency we see with Eduzendium pages, but we kept getting stopped.  [[CZ_Talk:Sp08UniversityofColoradoatBoulderANTH4110HumanEvolutionaryBiology#Start_an_Eduzendium_article|Here is a useful tool]] I made at that time.  [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 06:09, 14 March 2008 (CDT)
 
== Existing article? ==
 
Umm, did you notice that [[Parvovirus]] already existed? (Although it is rather stubby, I concede...) [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 09:29, 17 March 2008 (CDT)
 
: yes, I think a lot more can be added to Parvovirus. --[[User:John J. Dennehy|John J. Dennehy]] 10:32, 17 March 2008 (CDT)
 
Another one: one of your students [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Helicobacter_pylori&diff=100297260&oldid=100284377 deleted] the entire existing content of [[Helicobacter pylori]] - was that the approach they were supposed to take? [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 22:36, 29 March 2008 (CDT)
 
: well I told them to "be bold". Lets wait to see how the editing of this proceeds. I told her she should significantly improve the present (deleted) version. --[[User:John J. Dennehy|John J. Dennehy]] 12:43, 31 March 2008 (CDT)
 
== taxonomy box ==
John, I see you started a page for zoster.  You might consider putting in a blank taxonomy info box for the students to help them get started.  You can find one example at [[West Nile virus]], but I'm sure more complete ones can be found at other articles, perhaps some of the snake articles for example or even the [[Dog]] page maybe. [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 15:43, 18 March 2008 (CDT)
 
: OK I will try to add this to the student's pages.--[[User:John J. Dennehy|John J. Dennehy]] 15:04, 20 March 2008 (CDT)
 
== Student confusion ==
 
Having a clickable section [edit] button next to the clickable link "Student Microbe list" on the [[CZ:Biol 201: General Microbiology‎]] page was probably confusing them, which is probably why their organism list entries kept winding up on that page. I made a small change to get rid of that possibility; hope I didn't irritate you by just forging ahead and making the change myself. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 10:22, 27 March 2008 (CDT)
 
: It was a poor format by myself, the addition makes sense. Thanks! Be bold right:) --[[User:John J. Dennehy|John J. Dennehy]] 10:49, 27 March 2008 (CDT)
 
:: Again, you're welcome, and glad to help. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 19:36, 28 March 2008 (CDT)
 
== Thrichomonas vaginalis ==
 
I found a few web hits for [[Thrichomonas vaginalis]] at places that seemed like they should know what they are talking about... or is this just a typo on your student's part? [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 21:55, 2 April 2008 (CDT)
 
:typo [[User:John J. Dennehy|John J. Dennehy]] 05:55, 3 April 2008 (CDT)
 
::Im not sure if Dalia realizes that there is a [[Trichomonas vaginalis]] article. --[[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 08:28, 3 April 2008 (CDT)
 
:::Thanks for noticing. I didnt see it because of the misspelling. --[[User:John J. Dennehy|John J. Dennehy]] 08:49, 3 April 2008 (CDT)
 
:::: Arck! Sorry, I'd noticed you'd created [[Trichomonas vaginalis]], so I assumed you'd realize that [[Thrichomonas vaginalis]] was a duplicate article. If you all move the content from [[Thrichomonas vaginalis]] to [[Trichomonas vaginalis]], we can turn the former into a {{MW|Redirect}}; since sites like NIH have that misspelling, it's probably a relatively common typo, one that's worth keeping. Let us know when it's all cleared out, and we'll fix it up and cart everything else (e.g. [[Talk:Thrichomonas vaginalis]]) off to the e-trash. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 10:55, 3 April 2008 (CDT)
 
:::::I dont think there is any real content on Thrichomonas vaginalis. I put the redirect in. --[[User:John J. Dennehy|John J. Dennehy]] 11:00, 3 April 2008 (CDT)
 
==Citing Wikipedia==
 
I notice at least one of your students is citing Wikipedia in their article. As I expect you know, the whole rationale for Citizendium is that Wikipedia isn't reliable... so to cite it in Citizendium articles is, errrr,  inappropriate! :-) Sure, using it as a tool to find material is fine (it has much good/useful content), but not as an authority. Can you please pass the word to them (which is probably easier for you to do in class than for me to do electronically)? Thanks! [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 08:46, 6 April 2008 (CDT)
 
==Confused student?==
 
Is [[User:Michael Gary Tavitian|this person]] confused? (Look at the page, you'll see what I mean :-). [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 13:21, 17 April 2008 (CDT)
 
: Oh, he's got a lot of good content. We can just move it to [[Herpes simplex virus]] (or wherever it is supposed to be) for him. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 23:18, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
 
==Eduzendium articles==
Are they open for editing now? --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 10:07, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
::I am going thru and grading them. As I do, I am removing the Eduzendium do not touch tag. --[[User:John J. Dennehy|John J. Dennehy]] 11:25, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
:::Ok, just wanted clarification.  Thanks! --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 11:27, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
 
Thanks for this follow-up, John! --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:17, 19 May 2008 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 03:52, 8 March 2024

Student microbe list?

I cannot get an image of an E. coli bacillus filling out the College Boards with a very small #2 pencil in each flagellum. Howard C. Berkowitz 22:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Example microbe

Hi John, I took the liberty to adapt the formatting a bit, to facilitate maintenance of these articles here at CZ. I filled the {{EZnotice}} fields with placeholders, please replace these with the correct information. If you have questions or need assistance with the formatting of the course pages, please let me know. Cheers, --Daniel Mietchen 15:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Please take a look at this forum thread and comment. Thanks! --Daniel Mietchen 12:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Please also take a look at Special:WhatLinksHere/CZ:Biol_201:_General_Microbiology/EZnotice (e.g. Naegleria fowleri) and revert or modify this edit once you're done. --Daniel Mietchen 14:56, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

FYI

I made this change to reflect the new account that she now uses. D. Matt Innis 19:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks you've been a great help!John J. Dennehy 22:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

What is a micriobe?

Hi John, good to see you trying this out on the class again. I'd be interested to know the feed back you are getting from the students. As an aside, what is the definition you use for a microbe? I notice that a few of your students are choosing mushrooms and one even has C. elegans. Is that pushing the threshold on the size side, or is that within the current usage? Chris Day 19:37, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

OK, I answered my own question. http://www.microbeworld.org/know/largest.aspx They're bigger than I thought. Chris Day 19:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Chris, I will probably create a page asking students to write a bit about their experience. It would be great to get some first hand feedback. As far as what is a microbe, definitions are often hard to pin down in biology. Biological systems often fall along continuums rather than discrete black/white categories. The classic definition is single-celled organisms not visible to the naked eye, but as you can see what that entails is quite expansive. I'm keeping a rather broad perspective, and fungi and C. elegans are acceptable. John J. Dennehy 22:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

please consider approving the affiliation between the Biology Workgroup and Microbiology subgroup

Apparently, I need an editor to say that the biology workgroup can be "affiliated" with the Microbiology subgroup which I have created. Please consider saying this is ok as a biology editor. I also created an Infectious Disease subgroup, which I think will have different goals compared to a microbiology subgroup, and you can consider approving that as well for the biology affiliation if you would like. Some people will argue it is redundant, I don't think it is. Tom Kelly 06:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Category_talk:Biology_Affiliated_Subgroups
Of course! Where should I put my approval? The talk page? Also the vast majority of microbes are non pathogenic so it is entirely appropriate that there be a distinction between microbiology and infectious diseases. John J. Dennehy 13:11, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Given the number of elected pathogens, should the Politics workgroup sign off on Infectious Disease? :-) Howard C. Berkowitz 14:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

BW-related articles

Taking the defined articles from Select Agent Program/Agents, I tried to make them consistent with the new subgroups for microbiology and infectious disease. Tentativelly, I added the Military subgroup since these are organisms with declared biological warfare potential; I have not yet so changed the templates to include the additional organisms in CDC Bioterrorism Agents-Disease list, but will do so if there is consensus.

The Military assignment is a separate argument from Microbiology and Infectious Disease.

Would you consider it worth making it a priority, to assist your Eduzendium project, if I returned to build out biological weapon?

Howard C. Berkowitz 18:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

A brief tutorial into CZ

Hi John, please take a look at the following series of edits I made to explain the workings of CZ to one of your students.

  1. preparation of article
  2. create the article's metadata
  3. create the article's talk page
  4. start adding content
  5. link your article to other articles via intrawiki links
  6. put your article in context via the Related Articles subpage
  7. clean up any earlier tries that did not work out
  8. if the course is over, remove the EZ notice

I hope these may be useful for others.

Cheers, --Daniel Mietchen 14:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Daniel

I'd add that metadata can be complex from the beginner; I and others would be happy to help set up that CZ overhead. Errors in metadata can have effects in other places in the Wiki, so if help is needed, a note on a user page, an email to constables@citizendium.org, etc., can get help. I've been creating some. As I mentioned, it may also be helpful for CZ regulars to add to Related Articles, as they may know what is already here, naming conventions, etc. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:18, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

You've been Nominated!

Someone has nominated you for a position in the new Citizendium. They have noticed you're dedication to the project and like what they see. To be listed on the ballot for the position, it is necessary that you accept the nomination on the [[Archive:Citizendium Ballot for the Management Council|Nomination page]. Just place accept next to your name along with the four tildes. The nomination period will close at midnight October 7 (UTC). Article 54 of the new charter details the requirements:

Article 54

  • In conjunction with the Declaration of the Editor-in-Chief regarding the effectivity of this Charter, there shall be a call for nominations for the following offices: Managament Council (five seats), Editorial Council (seven seats), Managing Editor (one), Ombudsman (one). This shall be the effective date of the Charter.
  • Any Citizen may nominate candidates for these positions.
  • Nominations shall be collected and collated by the Chief Constable.
  • Nominations shall be accepted no more than fourteen days after the effective date of the charter; the ballot shall be available starting on the twentieth day after the effective date of the charter; the election shall be completed no more than twenty-eight days after the effective date of the charter; all elected officials shall begin their term of office on the thirtieth day after the effective date of the charter.
  • Only candidates who accept their nomination shall be eligible to appear on the ballot. Nominated candidates can accept nominations for no more than two official functions. Accepting a nomination serves as a declaration of commitment, in the case of being elected, to fulfill this function until the limit of the term.
  • All positions shall be elected by a simple majority of the voting citizenry. In the case of a tie, an immediate run-off election shall be held.
  • In the event that a candidate has been elected for two functions, the candidate shall declare which one he or she accepts within three days of announcement of the election results. In the event that such a declaration has not been made during this period, the candidate shall be considered elected for the position for which the nomination was accepted first. The same procedure applies to a reserve member that becomes elected by a seat being vacated this way.

If you would like to make a statement to help voters, click the "Statement" link to the right of your name.

Thanks again for the commitment you're making to assure that Citizendium becomes the premier quality online source we all have envisioned.

D. Matt Innis 13:01, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Returning to Citizendium: an update on the project and how to get involved

Hello - some time ago you became part of the Citizendium project, but we haven't seen you around for a while. Perhaps you'd like to update your public biography or check on the progress of any pages you've edited so far.

Citizendium now has over 16,000 articles, with more than 150 approved by specialist Editors such as yourself, but our contributor numbers require a boost. We have an initiative called 'Eduzendium' that brings in students enrolled on university courses to write articles for credit, but we still need more Editors across the community to write, discuss and approve material. There are some developed Biology articles that could be improved and approved, and some high-priority articles that we don't have yet. You can also create new articles via this guide, and contribute to some Biology pages that have been recently edited - or to any others on Citizendium, since you're a general Author as well as a specialist Editor. You may like to contribute to discussions in the forums, and might consider running for an elected position on the Management and Editorial Councils that oversee the project.

If you have any questions, let me know via my Talk page or by leaving a message below this one. Thank you for signing up and reading this update; I hope that you will look in on our community soon. John Stephenson 13:11, 19 November 2011 (UTC)