Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- ...' of the Web from the [[Dot Com Boom|"dot com" bust]]. O'Reilly described Web 2.0 as the business shift that arises from the rise of the "Internet as platfor The characteristics of 'Web 2.0' platforms include some kind of participatory component ('social software'2 KB (310 words) - 18:19, 11 August 2020
- 244 bytes (34 words) - 07:57, 4 August 2010
- 954 bytes (146 words) - 13:20, 29 March 2010
- ...a blog post by [[Nicholas Gruen]], focusing on the interrelations between Web 2.0, music and government492 bytes (60 words) - 11:58, 3 October 2010
Page text matches
- ...a blog post by [[Nicholas Gruen]], focusing on the interrelations between Web 2.0, music and government492 bytes (60 words) - 11:58, 3 October 2010
- ...mbrella term]] to describe adaptations of the [[scientific method]] to the Web 2.0 era of the [[World Wide Web]]. An important aspect of Science 2.0 is the leveraging or development of Web 2.0 tools and technologies — e.g. [[blog]]s, [[wiki]]s and [[social netwo1 KB (145 words) - 19:30, 14 February 2010
- An [[umbrella term]] for the use of [[Web 2.0]] tools and principles in [[scientific research]]; often used interchangeab277 bytes (35 words) - 09:50, 19 April 2010
- #REDIRECT [[Web 2.0]]21 bytes (2 words) - 05:51, 20 March 2010
- [[Web 2.0]] service which allows to upload and watch videos online.103 bytes (13 words) - 05:35, 15 March 2010
- Unconventional approaches to [[education]], particularly by means of [[Web 2.0]] tools.123 bytes (13 words) - 07:28, 6 August 2009
- WWW media and software developer responsible for the term [[Web 2.0]].106 bytes (13 words) - 14:20, 4 August 2009
- ...nfield (PLoS ONE) and Jason Hoyt (Mendeley) on publishing science in the [[Web 2.0]] era. ...ivkovic, Jean-Claude Bradley and Barry Canton on [[Open science]] in the [[Web 2.0]] era.534 bytes (72 words) - 09:53, 7 December 2022
- {{r|Web 2.0}}616 bytes (78 words) - 05:27, 25 March 2010
- ...ad. It's Filter Failure.] — presentation by [[Clay Shirky]] at the [[Web 2.0 Expo New York]], Sep 2008782 bytes (105 words) - 19:33, 9 December 2010
- The practice of keeping a [[research notebook]] in public by means of [[Web 2.0]].118 bytes (16 words) - 16:43, 17 March 2010
- An [[umbrella term]] used to label the use of [[Web 2.0]] tools for [[scientific method|scientific]] purposes.146 bytes (19 words) - 07:34, 14 September 2010
- A [[research notebook]] that is being kept in public, typically by means of [[Web 2.0]] tools like a [[blog]] or [[wiki]].158 bytes (23 words) - 17:16, 19 April 2010
- ...' of the Web from the [[Dot Com Boom|"dot com" bust]]. O'Reilly described Web 2.0 as the business shift that arises from the rise of the "Internet as platfor The characteristics of 'Web 2.0' platforms include some kind of participatory component ('social software'2 KB (310 words) - 18:19, 11 August 2020
- ...uTube and MySpace: The People, the Hype and the Deals Behind the Giants of Web 2.0 |year=2008 |location=Richmond |publisher=Crimson |isbn=9781854584533 }}237 bytes (32 words) - 09:25, 9 October 2013
- :Explains [[Web 2.0]] tools and their possible uses in research contexts580 bytes (71 words) - 17:32, 14 February 2011
- {{r|Web 2.0}}816 bytes (111 words) - 17:39, 11 January 2010
- ...open source software and content. He is credited with coining the term "[[Web 2.0]]"211 bytes (34 words) - 12:37, 2 February 2016
- [[Web 2.0]] location-based [[social network]] founded in 2000, acquired by Google in313 bytes (40 words) - 13:55, 15 March 2010
- {{r|Web 2.0}}1 KB (185 words) - 09:53, 19 April 2010
- {{r|Web 2.0}}198 bytes (23 words) - 05:25, 15 March 2010
- ...[[data]] as well as of the publications - in [[academic journal]]s or on [[Web 2.0]] platforms - describing research results derived from those data, along wi985 bytes (142 words) - 19:47, 24 July 2011
- {{r|Web 2.0}}1 KB (193 words) - 05:43, 20 April 2010
- {{r|Web 2.0}}323 bytes (39 words) - 17:03, 15 October 2011
- {{r|Web 2.0}}157 bytes (18 words) - 05:06, 1 July 2008
- == Web 2.0, and other context == A number of the CIS 700 articles reference [[Web 2.0]]. Citizendium (CZ) has no definition of it. Since I'm more of a specialist4 KB (741 words) - 17:36, 12 August 2008
- ...iated with large media organizations. In recent times, with the rise of "[[Web 2.0]]" and "social media", the idea of citizens doing reporting has been pushed557 bytes (80 words) - 10:44, 2 November 2008
- {{r|Web 2.0}}1 KB (182 words) - 06:13, 24 March 2024
- {{r|Web 2.0}}1 KB (182 words) - 06:13, 24 March 2024
- {{r|Web 2.0}}1 KB (186 words) - 07:34, 30 July 2010
- {{r|Web 2.0}}1 KB (188 words) - 07:33, 14 September 2010
- {{r|Web 2.0}}438 bytes (57 words) - 21:01, 11 January 2010
- Some commentators consider Google Maps to be an example of [[Web 2.0]], [[cloud computing]], [[Software as a Service]] and a [[cloud-based web s1 KB (214 words) - 11:02, 21 December 2009
- {{r|Web 2.0}}473 bytes (61 words) - 17:39, 11 January 2010
- ...eur: How Today's Internet is Killing Our Culture'' which argued that the [[Web 2.0]] revolution is too utopian, and leads to a decimation of valuable parts of566 bytes (79 words) - 11:05, 13 February 2009
- {{r|Web 2.0}}945 bytes (147 words) - 19:29, 15 March 2010
- ...hat-is-cloud-computing/video-online/2008/11/13 What is Cloud Computing ? - Web 2.0 expo] - A video where Tim O’Reilly, Dan Farber, Matt Mullenweg and others1 KB (156 words) - 16:16, 7 May 2010
- {{r|Web 2.0}}882 bytes (108 words) - 03:29, 5 January 2011
- *''Why Make Room for Experts in Web 2.0?'' (text of keynote at SDForum from Oct. 24, 2006)820 bytes (109 words) - 11:51, 5 February 2008
- ...Sun Microsystems]] and [[Yahoo!]] - as well as many startups in both the [[Web 2.0]] space and other areas - green technology is one area that is currently gr850 bytes (132 words) - 15:52, 8 March 2023
- ==Integrating Web 2.0 services==5 KB (768 words) - 21:25, 6 November 2010
- ==Web 2.0== ...ites cannot yet afford the implementation overhead. But tools support for Web 2.0 design approaches continues to evolve rapidly as of 2008, and this has resu12 KB (1,802 words) - 08:48, 22 April 2024
- ...ice.eu/resource/1680 2007, State-of-the-art in Good Practice Exchange and Web 2.0 - Report prepared by ePractice.eu - a project funded by the European Commi6 KB (945 words) - 20:25, 22 March 2008
- ...riety of web based mashups. [[Tim O'Reilly]] lists Mashups as one of the [[Web 2.0]] technologies. <ref name="Web2.0"> title="Levels of the Game: The Hierarchy of Web 2.0 Applications"}}24 KB (3,761 words) - 14:00, 18 February 2024
- ...the adaptive learning research area. Group collaboration is a key field in Web 2.0 which extends the functionality of distance learning. Adaptive learning can13 KB (1,938 words) - 10:30, 29 August 2008
- ...ly in the broad set of media, software, websites, and venues identified as Web 2.0. Particularly when encountering existing or created web pages, the anonymou7 KB (1,051 words) - 18:31, 13 March 2024
- ...of ''CMS'' is growing due to the expansion of web usage, especially with [[Web 2.0]] that allows web sites to interact with others web sites.26 KB (3,927 words) - 13:35, 11 May 2011
- ...ogy blogs and news outlets more traditionally associated with discussing [[Web 2.0]] services. Despite numerous statements by scientists - including statement7 KB (1,041 words) - 13:05, 15 October 2010
- :::Part of my pushing the argument here is also pushing the whole web 2.0 knowledge horizon. I agree with what Larry has said in other venues, that7 KB (1,230 words) - 19:42, 3 February 2009
- ...t. Examples of this are [[mobile software agents]], [[Java Applet]]s and [[Web 2.0]] applications.15 KB (2,278 words) - 05:21, 8 March 2024
- *'''Web 2.0 Technologies''' –Allows family and friends to browse for potential matche23 KB (3,464 words) - 11:48, 2 February 2023
- ...rs. It fills me with pride to think that ''we'' have shown the world that Web 2.0 with "gentle expert guidance," with "village elders wandering the bazaar,"22 KB (3,725 words) - 05:48, 28 August 2020
- ...f the rich, non-[[OLTP]] applications that are sprouting up as part of the Web 2.0 movement and often hosted by cloud providers. The schemaless nature of NoS46 KB (7,002 words) - 07:32, 18 September 2010
- ...ama|good news from America]] - but I managed to summon up a few words on [[Web 2.0]]. No national parks for me, I'm afraid. --[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 218 KB (2,890 words) - 15:04, 15 April 2024
- ...l these individual steps public, which is facilitated through the use of [[Web 2.0]] technologies in what has come to be called [[Science 2.0]].}}60 KB (9,261 words) - 15:41, 23 September 2013
- ...l these individual steps public, which is facilitated through the use of [[Web 2.0]] technologies in what has come to be called [[Science 2.0]].}}64 KB (9,985 words) - 12:27, 24 March 2022
- ...le, or, alternatively, that Google perpetuates the WP and superegalitarian Web 2.0 model. An alternative way to grow, however, is to show experts that there i ...probably noted that I've done a lot of work on social networks, not in the Web 2.0 sense but in the political, using, to some extent, techniques from intellig216 KB (35,266 words) - 10:45, 7 March 2024