Search results

...a central black eschar ([[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] 55%; [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] 92%).<ref name="pmid18614328">{{cite journal |author=Busch BA

* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 82% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 79%

{{main|Sensitivity and specificity}}

...ing and thus direct initial diagnostic and treatment plans; however, the [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] is low.<ref name="pmid20370741">{{cite journal| author=Palami

! Patients!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

! &nbsp;!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

! Finding!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

...[d-dimer]] test may not reliably detect thromboses of the calf vein with [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of about 65%.<ref name="pmid16175012">{{cite journal |author=

* [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] 95% * [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] 64%

...te journal |author=Erbel R, Schweizer P, Krebs W, Meyer J, Effert S |title=Sensitivity and specificity of two-dimensional echocardiography in detection of impaired left ventricul

...preferred rapid diagnostic test for evaluating urethritis. It is highly [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive and specific]] for documenting both urethritis and the presence o

...ivity]] for differentiating bacterial from viral infections was 92% with [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 73%.<ref name="pmid15307030">{{cite journal| author=Simon

* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 87% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 32%

* [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] = 97%<ref name="pmid11180735">{{cite journal |author=Gould MK * [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] = 78%<ref name="pmid11180735"/>to 82%<ref name="pmid18235105"

...ime]] (dAPTT) or dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT). These are more [[sensitivity and specificity|specific]] tests. These antibodies may interact with other risk factors suc

...f> This study reported a [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] and [[Sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 94% and 83%, respectively. In populations similar to thos

...ref> were more accurate than physician judgment because of the increased [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of the prediction rules. ! Finding!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

...one has insufficient [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of 83% ([[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 74%)<ref name="pmid18403624">{{cite journal |author=Moon W

The classic [[sign (medical)|signs]] on [[physical examination]] have a [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of less than 10%.<ref name="pmid19273776">{{cite journal |aut The transthoracic echocardiogram has a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 65% and 95% if the echocardiographer believes there is 'pr

|+Sensitivity and specificity of cardiac stress tests<ref name="pmid10357690">{{cite journal |author=Garb ! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]

! &nbsp;!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Likelihood ratio]]+ !! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Likelihood ratio]]-

* In one study, normal overnight oximetry was very [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] and so if normal, sleep apnea was unlikely.<ref name="pmid83571 ...rations/hour, was very [[Sensitivity and specificity|specific]], but not [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]].<ref name="pmid8539678">{{cite journal| author=Ryan PJ, Hilton

...alidating the prediction of lower urinary tract infection in primary care: sensitivity and specificity of urinary dipsticks and clinical scores in women. | journal=Br J Gen Pract

...immunoenzyme technique]], and [[polymerase chain reaction]] testing. The [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of these tests range from 63% to 95%.<ref>Beyer WE. Heterogen The [[polymerase chain reaction]] is the most [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] test and is as sensitive as viral culture.<ref name="pmid192813

| Diagnosis||sensitiv*[Title/Abstract] OR sensitivity and specificity[MeSH Terms] OR diagnos*{Title/Abstract] OR diagnosis[MeSH:noexp] OR diagnos

: See also [[Bayes Theorem]], [[sensitivity and specificity]], and [[likelihood ratio]]. ...66 |issn=}}</ref><br/>([[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] plus [[Sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]) ||Easy to understand<br/>Stable with prevalence of disease

...creased from 0.795 to 0.799 and 12% of patients had improved estimates - [[sensitivity and specificity|net reclassification improvement]] (NRI) = 11%).<ref name="pmid20031795">{{

* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 88.4% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 81.1%

...und that DNA was more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] but less [[sensitivity and specificity|specific]]<ref name="pmid18838724">{{cite journal |author=Ahlquist DA, Sarg ...se negative rate (1-[[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]) 22%<br/>[[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 78%|| align="center"|[http://medinformatics.uthscsa.edu/calcu

...kul S, Maneerat J, Sa-nguansermsri T, Dhananjayanonda P, Tongsong T |title=Sensitivity and specificity of mean corpuscular volume testing for screening for alpha-thalassemia-1 an

* Total lymphocyte count of more than 2000 has [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] or 95% * Total lymphocyte count of less than 1200 has [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 95%

...me!!rowspan="2"|[[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!!rowspan="2"|[[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]!! colspan="2"| For 5% prevalence of osteoporosis <br/>as rep ...ty and specificity|Sensitivity]]<br/>(taken from Table 1 of Johansson)!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]<br/>(calculated from Table 1 of Johansson)!! Positive predict

...s [[c-reactive protein]]||"myocardial infarction and CHD-related death"||[[sensitivity and specificity|Net reclassification improvement]] = 12%<ref>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1161 ...www.reynoldsriskscore.org/ Reynolds Score])||All cardiovascular events|| [[sensitivity and specificity|Net reclassification improvement]] = 8% (in men)<ref name="pmid18997194">{

...of recent studies show that alpha-fetoprotein determination lacks adequate sensitivity and specificity for effective surveillance (and for diagnosis). Thus, surveillance has to b

...nt Health Questionnaire (PHQ2) is a shorter questionnaire that may be as [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] as the [[Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders| ...e PHQ2 is positive, then the SALSA questionnaire may be used to increase [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]<ref name="pmid9855385">{{cite journal |author=Brody DS, Hahn

...disease never develops in many subjects with this genotype}}</ref>, its [[sensitivity and specificity]] are insufficient (65 and 68 percent, respectively) to be used as a diagno

...specificity|Specificity]]!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

...title=The accuracy of patients' judgments of disease probability and test sensitivity and specificity. | journal=J Fam Pract | year= 1998 | volume= 47 | issue= 1 | pages= 44-52

...ore specifically, [[enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay]]) tend to be more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]].<ref name="pmid15096330">{{cite journal |author=Stein PD, Hull ! &nbsp; !! [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]]!! [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]

Direct visualization by [[esophagogastroduodenoscopy]](EGD) is very [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] for [[peptic ulcer disease]], but may not detect all possible u

...i= |url= |issn=}}</ref> Unfortunately, neither of these studies used the [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] [[polymerase chain reaction]] as a reference standard. ! &nbsp;!! Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

...mbol of the examination, but the finding of preliminary abnormalities is [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitive but not selective]]. Particular sounds, such as [[rales]] and [[r

...disease never develops in many subjects with this genotype}}</ref>, its [[sensitivity and specificity]] are insufficient (65 and 68 percent, respectively) to be used as a diagno

...te journal |author=Erbel R, Schweizer P, Krebs W, Meyer J, Effert S |title=Sensitivity and specificity of two-dimensional echocardiography in detection of impaired left ventricul

...relevant documents that are successfully retrieved. This is the same as [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]]. The recall has also been called the "yield"<ref name="pmid20 .../cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=22249990 }} </ref> This is the same as [[sensitivity and specificity|positive predictive value]].

* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Likelihood ratio +]] 8.6 * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Likelihood ratio -]] 0.26

...ear=2007 |pmid=18064524 |doi=10.1007/s11606-007-0330-1 |issn=}}</ref> or [[sensitivity and specificity]] are two methods. It is unclear which method is better according to the re * [[Sensitivity and specificity]]