Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- '''Intelligent design''' ('''ID''') is the claim that fundamental features of the [[universe]] an ...rom the National Academy of Sciences, Second Edition (1999)].'</ref> See [[intelligent design movement]] for an account of political efforts to promote education about41 KB (6,423 words) - 10:03, 14 February 2021
- #REDIRECT [[Intelligent design]]32 bytes (3 words) - 23:33, 24 May 2007
- 145 bytes (19 words) - 05:02, 1 July 2008
- The '''Intelligent Design movement''' is a political movement designed to weaken Darwinism, especiall ...re best explained by purposeful causation — a "higher intelligence." See [[intelligent design]] for a better explanation of these claims, and why they are not supported20 KB (3,035 words) - 07:31, 20 April 2024
- #REDIRECT [[Intelligent design movement]]41 bytes (4 words) - 08:33, 17 May 2007
- 12 bytes (1 word) - 19:43, 3 November 2007
- * Numbers, Ronald L. ''The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design'' (2nd ed 2006) * [[Robert T. Pennock|Pennock, Robert T.]] ''Intelligent Design Creationism And Its Critics'' (2001, MIT Press)2 KB (291 words) - 07:22, 25 August 2008
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}}243 bytes (32 words) - 09:48, 25 March 2024
- ...al report reprinted from ''Natural History'' magazine. Three proponents of intelligent design present their views. Each view is followed by a response from a proponent o *[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10545387/ Judge rules against ‘intelligent design’] msnbc.com988 bytes (126 words) - 10:40, 25 October 2010
- 152 bytes (19 words) - 11:52, 2 February 2023
- :''See also: [[Intelligent design/Bibliography|Intelligent Design > Bibliography]]'' * Numbers, Ronald L. ''The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design'' (2nd ed 2006)809 bytes (101 words) - 14:27, 26 September 2008
- 12 bytes (1 word) - 19:46, 3 November 2007
- *[[Intelligent design]]719 bytes (109 words) - 05:25, 26 September 2008
Page text matches
- ...al report reprinted from ''Natural History'' magazine. Three proponents of intelligent design present their views. Each view is followed by a response from a proponent o *[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10545387/ Judge rules against ‘intelligent design’] msnbc.com988 bytes (126 words) - 10:40, 25 October 2010
- :''See also: [[Intelligent design/Bibliography|Intelligent Design > Bibliography]]'' * Numbers, Ronald L. ''The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design'' (2nd ed 2006)809 bytes (101 words) - 14:27, 26 September 2008
- #REDIRECT [[Intelligent design]]32 bytes (3 words) - 23:33, 24 May 2007
- #REDIRECT [[Intelligent design movement]]41 bytes (4 words) - 08:33, 17 May 2007
- Conservative think-tank based in Seattle; best-known for promoting [[intelligent design]] creationism.138 bytes (14 words) - 01:42, 5 January 2009
- * Numbers, Ronald L. ''The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design'' (2nd ed 2006) * [[Robert T. Pennock|Pennock, Robert T.]] ''Intelligent Design Creationism And Its Critics'' (2001, MIT Press)2 KB (291 words) - 07:22, 25 August 2008
- ...d against views that are incompatible with metaphysical naturalism, namely intelligent design.1 KB (203 words) - 18:34, 17 December 2009
- {{rpl|Intelligent design}}128 bytes (18 words) - 05:09, 24 September 2013
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}} {{r|Intelligent design}}729 bytes (94 words) - 18:36, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}}243 bytes (32 words) - 09:48, 25 March 2024
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}}225 bytes (27 words) - 11:01, 15 April 2024
- {{r|intelligent design}}221 bytes (28 words) - 14:06, 12 August 2008
- {{r|intelligent design}}166 bytes (20 words) - 18:20, 26 January 2009
- ...a, but is best known for being the institutional home of many promoters of intelligent design. It receives significant sums from a variety of conservative foundations in ...gn proponentsists".</ref>. The Discovery Institute fellows responsible for Intelligent Design advocacy include Phillip E. Johnson, Stephen C. Meyer, Jonathan Wells, Will3 KB (486 words) - 01:55, 27 March 2024
- *[[Intelligent design]]719 bytes (109 words) - 05:25, 26 September 2008
- {{r|Intelligent Design}}320 bytes (41 words) - 05:31, 28 August 2009
- {{r|Intelligent design}}605 bytes (77 words) - 14:41, 18 March 2024
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}}472 bytes (59 words) - 16:00, 11 January 2010
- ...est is in philosophical issues around [[evolution]], [[creationism]] and [[Intelligent Design]] - the latter two he fiercely opposes. The books ''Darwinism Defended: A G ...tp://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2006/mar/27/religion.schools Why the intelligent design lobby thanks God for Richard Dawkins], ''[[The Guardian]]'', March 27, 20062 KB (301 words) - 05:49, 2 November 2008
- {{r|Intelligent design}}1 KB (163 words) - 07:29, 24 April 2024
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}}553 bytes (74 words) - 09:58, 27 June 2023
- {{r|Intelligent design}}888 bytes (112 words) - 18:38, 29 December 2020
- {{r|Intelligent design}}678 bytes (87 words) - 19:33, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Intelligent design}}1 KB (130 words) - 17:26, 11 January 2010
- *[[Intelligent design]]807 bytes (119 words) - 16:23, 29 November 2008
- {{r|Intelligent design movement}}1 KB (143 words) - 10:58, 11 January 2010
- ...ution in late 20th century; covers Darwinism, young earth creationism, and intelligent design.1 KB (180 words) - 16:22, 29 November 2008
- * [[Intelligent Design]]3 KB (517 words) - 02:35, 19 September 2013
- ...from government buildings, supporting [[gay rights]], and opposition to [[Intelligent Design]]: ACLU lawyers represented Scopes at the "monkey trial" in 1925. The ACLU2 KB (226 words) - 16:03, 25 March 2024
- * [[Robert T. Pennock]], ''Intelligent Design Creationism And Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological and Scientific Pers1 KB (182 words) - 20:00, 25 April 2009
- The '''Intelligent Design movement''' is a political movement designed to weaken Darwinism, especiall ...re best explained by purposeful causation — a "higher intelligence." See [[intelligent design]] for a better explanation of these claims, and why they are not supported20 KB (3,035 words) - 07:31, 20 April 2024
- {{r|Intelligent design}}4 KB (486 words) - 19:46, 11 January 2010
- *''Expelled'' (2008) Pro-[[intelligent design]] documentary; Dawkins appeared after receiving misleading information abou3 KB (480 words) - 02:00, 5 January 2011
- * [[Robert T. Pennock]], ''Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics'', Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2001.3 KB (396 words) - 00:23, 16 July 2013
- ...ionists forced them to follow a new strategy, relabelling creationism as [[intelligent design]], which led to the 2004 ''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School Board'' case.4 KB (572 words) - 15:46, 2 February 2024
- ...1814/Evolution-Creationism-Intelligent-Design.aspx Evolution, Creationism, Intelligent Design].</ref> [[Old Earth creationists]] accept the age figures supplied by astro ...hool District'' (2005) agreed with Scott, the NCSE and the plaintiffs that intelligent design's religious nature "would be readily observable to an objective observer" a26 KB (3,971 words) - 04:23, 12 June 2023
- ...nt his views. The latest is his appearance in the creationist-backed pro-[[intelligent design]] film ''[[Expelled]]'' (2008), which Dawkins and others participated in un4 KB (670 words) - 08:50, 18 October 2013
- '''Intelligent design''' ('''ID''') is the claim that fundamental features of the [[universe]] an ...rom the National Academy of Sciences, Second Edition (1999)].'</ref> See [[intelligent design movement]] for an account of political efforts to promote education about41 KB (6,423 words) - 10:03, 14 February 2021
- ...tzmiller v. Dover Area School District]]'' results in a decision against [[intelligent design]].5 KB (718 words) - 14:06, 22 March 2009
- {{cite book |title=The cosmic landscape: string theory and the illusion of intelligent design |author=Leonard Susskind |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=RIW9E1sOyxUC6 KB (907 words) - 07:58, 28 May 2022
- ...Haught]] and [[Barbara Forrest]] argued against it, then came down against Intelligent Design, declaring it to be religious and not to be taught in science for the reaso20 KB (2,986 words) - 16:44, 1 April 2024
- ...5/science/sciencespecial2/05design.html Closing Arguments Made in Trial on Intelligent Design]''New York Times'', November 5, 2005</ref>).16 KB (2,443 words) - 13:39, 25 January 2011
- ...2)to motivate editors to get their articles approved. Articles such as [[Intelligent design]] and [[Global warming]] are the reason I thought them necessary initially.12 KB (1,944 words) - 13:37, 12 February 2008
- - [[Intelligent design movement]] -9 KB (1,506 words) - 08:22, 28 April 2024
- ...something of a resurgence of popularity for this argument in the form of [[intelligent design]].23 KB (3,598 words) - 11:48, 2 February 2023
- ...ideas to be given classroom time: whether that means [[creationism]] or [[intelligent design]], [[comparative religion]] compared to specific religious instruction, abs9 KB (1,387 words) - 15:38, 1 April 2024
- In the beginning, the first book, [[Genesis]], tells the stories of [[Intelligent design|the Creation]], [[Adam and Eve]], [[Noah]] and the [[Flood]], the [[Tower o9 KB (1,381 words) - 15:55, 12 August 2020
- ...nist (including both young- and old-earth creationist, and supporters of [[intelligent design]] theory). Politically, Conservapedia takes a position that is [[abortion|a11 KB (1,540 words) - 07:09, 26 March 2024
- ...validates particular religious or political beliefs. [[Creationism]] and [[intelligent design]] are both adopted primarily because they support certain religious – oft ===Intelligent design===39 KB (6,025 words) - 18:53, 30 April 2024
- ...ministry that promotes young Earth creationism. <ref> Creationism 'Lite': 'Intelligent design' proponents marry God and evolution. wire service dispatch in ''The Record11 KB (1,790 words) - 09:53, 11 June 2023
- More recently, the battles over teaching [[evolution]] and [[intelligent design]] in the public schools have brought some philosophical issues to the fore31 KB (4,648 words) - 05:07, 26 October 2013
- ...t some intelligence must have been involved in their design. The theory of Intelligent Design is accepted by very few biologists; most do not agree that the theory of na60 KB (9,261 words) - 15:41, 23 September 2013
- ...ficant conflict tend to span workgroups, or be outside them - e.g. Jesus, Intelligent Design, Scientific Method, Pseudoscience, and those with political overtones where ...contentious articles. We don't have a workable mechanism for approving say Intelligent Design, even though that article now seems to be stable and in good shape.[[User:G51 KB (8,532 words) - 12:14, 13 March 2024
- ...t some intelligence must have been involved in their design. The theory of Intelligent Design is accepted by very few biologists; most do not agree that the theory of na64 KB (9,985 words) - 12:27, 24 March 2022
- For a discussion by a proponent of intelligent design, see for example {{cite book |title=Climate Confusion: How global warming h44 KB (6,711 words) - 20:01, 11 October 2013
- ...1814/evolution-creationism-intelligent-design.aspx Evolution, Creationism, Intelligent Design].</ref>19 KB (3,082 words) - 21:20, 11 March 2011
- ...2)to motivate editors to get their articles approved. Articles such as [[Intelligent design]] and [[Global warming]] are the reason I thought them necessary initially.33 KB (5,350 words) - 18:42, 3 March 2024
- ...be a significant blow to notions of [[creationism|divine creation]] and [[intelligent design]] prevalent in [[19th-century]] science, specifically overturning the [[Cre48 KB (7,518 words) - 07:31, 20 April 2024
- ...iss army knife, are misleading because computers and tools are products of intelligent design. In contrast, minds are products of natural selection whose intertwined com31 KB (4,553 words) - 18:17, 18 July 2016
- ...ing Spaghetti Monster]]-ism.''' Created to mock advocacy and teaching of [[intelligent design]].35 KB (5,281 words) - 18:42, 3 March 2024
- :::I'd also like to point out that, as with [[intelligent design]], we can have long meaty articles about views that are widely rejected by56 KB (8,977 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
- : And, should [[terrorism]] (or [[Intelligent Design]], i.e., very controversial topics) start with a definition? I say, yes. Fo66 KB (10,879 words) - 17:02, 5 March 2024
- :::::::When working on the [[Intelligent Design]] article, there was much vitriol over including the Biology workgroup as s ...y editor should be able to correct anything written about evolution in the Intelligent Design article without claiming knowledge about ID or lending credibility to the c216 KB (35,266 words) - 10:45, 7 March 2024
- ...rayer in public schools and the inclusion of teaching [[creationism]] or [[intelligent design]] alongside [[evolution]]. Although the GOP has voted for increases in gove70 KB (10,151 words) - 15:04, 15 April 2024