CZ Talk:Security Subgroup: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→Trying to set this up: new section) |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "cryptology" to "cryptology") |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Trying to set this up == | == Trying to set this up == | ||
I've never set up a subgroup, and it doesn't yet seem to be working. So far, I ''think'' I've added myself as a member, and [[information assurance]], | I've never set up a subgroup, and it doesn't yet seem to be working. So far, I ''think'' I've added myself as a member, and [[information assurance]], cryptology, and [[classified information]] as articles. What, if anything, am I doing wrong, or do I need to wait for something to update? --[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 15:48, 27 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:When I click on the members link above I see your name in there. I wonder if it's a cache issue your end? [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 15:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
::Perhaps it needed definition of the [[Security]] article first? After that, it seemed to work -- although it also could have been timing. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 17:00, 27 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Lemma/redirect articles== | |||
There are things like [[rewrite attack]] or [[Feistel cipher]] that should likely be added, but since they are only redirects, I'm not sure how. Putting a subpages tag on them seems excessive. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 04:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
:At present we are not adding categories to lemma articles or redirect terms. This does not mean it will never happen but I'd say don't worry about it for now. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 04:53, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
:: My worry is that when a user looks at the subgroup to see what is covered, the list should include those terms. My example terms could be made into separate articles to facilitate that, but I do not think either of them should be. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 05:01, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::We've discussed this issue in the forums a bit and there is no easy solution. In the long run I think the readers will gravitate to the related articles subpages for navigating through a topic. Such subpages have the advantage that many of the redirects will exist on those pages along with their definitions with the use of the R template. The categories, while useful for cataloging too, are primarily for allowing a recent changes view, like a watchlist specific to security (see the [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Special:RecentChangesLinked&target=Category%3ASecurity_tag recent changes link] above). But, Daniel does have [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,3065.msg27564.html#msg27564 some ideas] how the redirect terms could be in the appropriate categories if a related articles page for the redirect exists. Ideally we'd like to avoid the manual placement of categories since inevitably there will be typo's and authors will be too creative and make up novel categories. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 05:58, 2 March 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:37, 18 March 2024
| ||||||||
Main article | Home | Talk | All articles (125) | Citable (2) | Members (2) | Recent changes | ||
Affiliation: Computers (Recent changes)| Military (Recent changes)| Engineering (Recent changes)| [ e ] |
Trying to set this up
I've never set up a subgroup, and it doesn't yet seem to be working. So far, I think I've added myself as a member, and information assurance, cryptology, and classified information as articles. What, if anything, am I doing wrong, or do I need to wait for something to update? --Howard C. Berkowitz 15:48, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- When I click on the members link above I see your name in there. I wonder if it's a cache issue your end? Chris Day 15:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps it needed definition of the Security article first? After that, it seemed to work -- although it also could have been timing. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:00, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Lemma/redirect articles
There are things like rewrite attack or Feistel cipher that should likely be added, but since they are only redirects, I'm not sure how. Putting a subpages tag on them seems excessive. Sandy Harris 04:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- At present we are not adding categories to lemma articles or redirect terms. This does not mean it will never happen but I'd say don't worry about it for now. Chris Day 04:53, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- My worry is that when a user looks at the subgroup to see what is covered, the list should include those terms. My example terms could be made into separate articles to facilitate that, but I do not think either of them should be. Sandy Harris 05:01, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- We've discussed this issue in the forums a bit and there is no easy solution. In the long run I think the readers will gravitate to the related articles subpages for navigating through a topic. Such subpages have the advantage that many of the redirects will exist on those pages along with their definitions with the use of the R template. The categories, while useful for cataloging too, are primarily for allowing a recent changes view, like a watchlist specific to security (see the recent changes link above). But, Daniel does have some ideas how the redirect terms could be in the appropriate categories if a related articles page for the redirect exists. Ideally we'd like to avoid the manual placement of categories since inevitably there will be typo's and authors will be too creative and make up novel categories. Chris Day 05:58, 2 March 2010 (UTC)