Vaginitis: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Badgett
No edit summary
imported>Robert Badgett
Line 6: Line 6:
* [[Candida albicans]] usually causes itching and the absence of this finding helps exclude this pathogen.
* [[Candida albicans]] usually causes itching and the absence of this finding helps exclude this pathogen.
* [[Gardnerella vaginalis]] usually causes foul and the absence of this finding helps exclude this pathogen.
* [[Gardnerella vaginalis]] usually causes foul and the absence of this finding helps exclude this pathogen.
A more recent [[meta-analysis]] estimates that the accuracy of the [[physical examination]] as compared to [[DNA probe]] testing are:<ref name="pmid19104364">{{cite journal |author=Lowe NK, Neal JL, Ryan-Wenger NA |title=Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of vaginitis compared with a DNA probe laboratory standard |journal=Obstet Gynecol |volume=113 |issue=1 |pages=89–95 |year=2009 |month=January |pmid=19104364 |doi=10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181909f63 |url=http://www.greenjournal.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=19104364 |issn=}}</ref>
* [[sensitivity (tests)|sensitivity]] = 81-85%
* [[specificity (tests)|specificity]] = 70-99%


==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>

Revision as of 09:18, 21 January 2009

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

In medicine, vaginitis is "inflammation of the vagina characterized by pain and a purulent discharge."[1] Common causes are trichimonas vaginalis, candida albicans, and gardnerella vaginalis.

Diagnosis

The best symptoms and physical examination findings for diagnosis have been identified in a systematic review by the Rational Clinical Examination.[2]

  • Candida albicans usually causes itching and the absence of this finding helps exclude this pathogen.
  • Gardnerella vaginalis usually causes foul and the absence of this finding helps exclude this pathogen.

A more recent meta-analysis estimates that the accuracy of the physical examination as compared to DNA probe testing are:[3]

References