User talk:Christo Muller: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
(state associations)
imported>Christo Muller
Line 53: Line 53:
*that the two national associations '''(AMA and ACA)''' should remain separate
*that the two national associations '''(AMA and ACA)''' should remain separate
I always read that to mean the ''two chiropractic associations'' (ICA and ACA) should remain separate.  If you are right, it indicates much less of a conspiracy than my read.  Where did you get that impression?  -[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 16:41, 8 March 2007 (CST)
I always read that to mean the ''two chiropractic associations'' (ICA and ACA) should remain separate.  If you are right, it indicates much less of a conspiracy than my read.  Where did you get that impression?  -[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 16:41, 8 March 2007 (CST)
:I think that was a misread, if anything, Matt. I can't think of reading anywhere which two associations were being referred to, and it never struck me that the phrase was about the ICA and ACA. Your reading makes more sense, but where would the original quotes be found? They should specify... For me the worst part is the "suppression of research", but one would like to see what exactly that refers to. Is it significant or an after-the-fact reason for not doing research? --[[User:Christo_Muller|Christo Muller]] [[User_talk:Christo_Muller|(Talk)]] 02:35, 9 March 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 03:35, 9 March 2007

Day 1

Christo, please fill out your user page! Reading only is ok before you do. Thanks, Nancy Sculerati MD 11:23, 28 January 2007 (CST)

Welcome to Citizendium! We are so pleased to have you, I think that you certainly qualify-once you state or refer us to your education and training details - to be an editor both in Health Sciences and in Healing Arts (for starters!) . Of course, you are welcome to author in any article you like. I, personally, look forward to your work here, as I suspect we share many interests. Warmly, Nancy Nancy Sculerati MD 12:21, 28 January 2007 (CST)

CCL

I like your page about the licences. I was messing around with some templates today [1], specifically for GFDL-user Cc-by-sa-2.5. i just copied everything from wikimedia and made a few CZ related modifications. I was copying them across since they can then be used with the media that gets imported from wikipedia and wikimedia commons. However, i have no clue about this stuff so any input would be great. Chris Day (Talk) 22:58, 1 February 2007 (CST)

From David Tribe

I visited Tygerberg in March last year, and talked to the fumonisin mycotoxin researchers there. Stayed at U Cape town Ronderbosch. And fell in love with the Cape again David Tribe 05:38, 12 February 2007 (CST)

Thanks

Thanks Christo, that was a great help. I doubt I'd be able to get down to it anytime soon as I'm gearing up for my AFP exams, but I'll keep it on my to-do list. ;)--Yim Kai-mun 19:15, 13 February 2007 (CST)

Spinal adjustment

I think there has just not been any discussion yet on Spinal adjustment. Lets just start one there and if it gets zapped, we'll just remeber what we said:) Matt Innis (Talk) 08:10, 17 February 2007 (CST)

Consider it gone! Hey, whay are you not down as a Healing arts editor? Matt Innis (Talk) 18:18, 18 February 2007 (CST)

Thanks Christo!

It's nice to be back.:-) Nancy Nancy Sculerati MD 13:47, 21 February 2007 (CST)

Cheers!

Cheers...and you're one of the few privileged to know and use my English name! :P I never did like it, but I am Christian and was given that name at birth. Thanks so much for the help; I really do appreciate it. :)--Yim Kai-mun 19:39, 21 February 2007 (CST)

Cosmetic plastic surgery, Chin Augmentation

Christo, I know these are not your actual specialties, (Cosmetic Surgery, Chin augmentation), but I hope that you will look them over. I started on "Chin Augmentation" when I noticed it the other day on recent changes, and then I started cosmetic surgery from there. Did you put your Pain article up while I was gone? Nancy Nancy Sculerati MD 05:59, 22 February 2007 (CST)

Healing arts

Christo, when you get a chance can you look at this? -Matt Innis (Talk) 12:57, 26 February 2007 (CST)

Christo, your help needed on chiropractic again!. -Matt Innis (Talk) 19:21, 4 March 2007 (CST)

Christo, I like your thoughts on article mechanics. This is the kind of work I would like to see onthe healing arts articles. --Matt Innis (Talk) 08:21, 6 March 2007 (CST)

Offline Mediawiki (from Nereo Preto)

Hi Christo,

you offered, some days ago, to help me install a good offline mediawiki editor in my laptop (you say you know how). Now I probably have the time to handle it and -of course- I am still interested. Can you come to my talk page and append something on how we can do it technically?

Many thanks in advance, --Nereo Preto 12:37, 6 March 2007 (CST)

I just downloaded and installed the WOS package. It seems to work fine at a first glance! I'll do some writing in the next days and let you know how well it goes on the long run. Then, if you want, we can lay down an article on it. I also believe it might be useful to many users out there. But for now, MANY MANY THANKS!!! Ciao, --Nereo Preto 13:53, 8 March 2007 (CST)

state associations

Christo, you made an insertion that is interesting:

  • that the two national associations (AMA and ACA) should remain separate

I always read that to mean the two chiropractic associations (ICA and ACA) should remain separate. If you are right, it indicates much less of a conspiracy than my read. Where did you get that impression? -Matt Innis (Talk) 16:41, 8 March 2007 (CST)

I think that was a misread, if anything, Matt. I can't think of reading anywhere which two associations were being referred to, and it never struck me that the phrase was about the ICA and ACA. Your reading makes more sense, but where would the original quotes be found? They should specify... For me the worst part is the "suppression of research", but one would like to see what exactly that refers to. Is it significant or an after-the-fact reason for not doing research? --Christo Muller (Talk) 02:35, 9 March 2007 (CST)