Template talk:Main: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ryan McCue No edit summary |
imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling (Comment on wording of template) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: It's a bit on the long side, I agree. But I feel like "Main article: XYZ" is a bit terse. What if we shrunk it by about 10% using CSS or something? --[[User:ZachPruckowski|ZachPruckowski]] 14:00, 25 January 2007 (CST) | : It's a bit on the long side, I agree. But I feel like "Main article: XYZ" is a bit terse. What if we shrunk it by about 10% using CSS or something? --[[User:ZachPruckowski|ZachPruckowski]] 14:00, 25 January 2007 (CST) | ||
:: How about <nowiki><small></nowiki> around it? [[User:Ryan McCue|Ryan McCue]] <sup>[[User_talk:Ryan McCue|Let's have a chat]]</sup> 01:57, 28 January 2007 (CST) | :: How about <nowiki><small></nowiki> around it? [[User:Ryan McCue|Ryan McCue]] <sup>[[User_talk:Ryan McCue|Let's have a chat]]</sup> 01:57, 28 January 2007 (CST) | ||
::: The current text defeats the purpose of the original Wikipedia template. "See also" already exists, the "main" template is surely meant to indicate that the page contains only a brief resume of a topic dealt with in much greater detail elsewhere. —[[User:Joseph Rushton Wakeling|Joseph Rushton Wakeling]] 12:49, 9 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 13:49, 9 February 2007
I prefer the concise wording used on Wikipedia, "Main article: XYZ". Fredrik Johansson 12:27, 25 January 2007 (CST)
- I agree it is too long, it seems a bit intrusive. Chris Day (Talk) 13:50, 25 January 2007 (CST)
- It's a bit on the long side, I agree. But I feel like "Main article: XYZ" is a bit terse. What if we shrunk it by about 10% using CSS or something? --ZachPruckowski 14:00, 25 January 2007 (CST)
- How about <small> around it? Ryan McCue Let's have a chat 01:57, 28 January 2007 (CST)
- The current text defeats the purpose of the original Wikipedia template. "See also" already exists, the "main" template is surely meant to indicate that the page contains only a brief resume of a topic dealt with in much greater detail elsewhere. —Joseph Rushton Wakeling 12:49, 9 February 2007 (CST)
- How about <small> around it? Ryan McCue Let's have a chat 01:57, 28 January 2007 (CST)