Talk:Time value of money: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
imported>Nick Gardner
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}


== A candidate for deletion ==
== A candidate for deletion? ==


The intellectual level of this article is more suitable for schoolchildren than for the undergraduate/graduate reader that Citizendium is intended to serve. It gives the misleading impression that the time value of money can be explained by a tautology  and some elementary algebra. I am inclined to ask for its deletion on the grounds that it is duplicated by the [[discount rate]] article which is of a higher standard. Does anyone disagree? [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 07:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
The intellectual level of this article is more suitable for schoolchildren than for the undergraduate/graduate reader that Citizendium is intended to serve. It gives the misleading impression that the time value of money can be explained by a tautology  and some elementary algebra. I am inclined to ask for its deletion on the grounds that it is duplicated by the [[discount rate]] article which is of a higher standard. Does anyone disagree? [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 07:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:16, 18 January 2010

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Concept that money available now is worth more than the same amount in the future because of its potential earning capacity. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Economics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

A candidate for deletion?

The intellectual level of this article is more suitable for schoolchildren than for the undergraduate/graduate reader that Citizendium is intended to serve. It gives the misleading impression that the time value of money can be explained by a tautology and some elementary algebra. I am inclined to ask for its deletion on the grounds that it is duplicated by the discount rate article which is of a higher standard. Does anyone disagree? Nick Gardner 07:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)