Talk:Recipe: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ro Thorpe |
imported>Aleta Curry (I'm wrong every ten years or so, boys, BUT NOT TODAY!) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I spent 8 months in London in 1968 and never heard it. I have a couple of British "cookery" books and I'm pretty sure that they don't either. It wuz Aleta who wrote the article -- maybe it's a Digger thing.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 16:30, 3 March 2008 (CST) | :I spent 8 months in London in 1968 and never heard it. I have a couple of British "cookery" books and I'm pretty sure that they don't either. It wuz Aleta who wrote the article -- maybe it's a Digger thing.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 16:30, 3 March 2008 (CST) | ||
::Maybe, but my Oxford Dictionary just says it's 'arch.' [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 16:36, 3 March 2008 (CST) | ::Maybe, but my Oxford Dictionary just says it's 'arch.' [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 16:36, 3 March 2008 (CST) | ||
:::Was that "archaic", Ro, or "archetypal"? ;) | |||
:::Haven't you read any British literature, Sanger? And the rest of you? P) | |||
:::You can put "formerly" if you want, because I haven't lived in England in...mumble...mumble...years, but older folks of a certain class always said "receipt" back in the day. | |||
:::AND, FYI, I just checked my American dictionary. Definition no. 1 for 'receipt'=(''drum roll'') "RECIPE"! | |||
:::[[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 20:33, 3 March 2008 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 21:33, 3 March 2008
masochist?
That's fer sure! I'll see tomorrow if I can put any of my own fairly dogmatic ideas into it.... Hayford Peirce 21:46, 2 March 2008 (CST)
Hayford, do Brits really call recipes "receipts"? I've never heard that before. --Larry Sanger 15:35, 3 March 2008 (CST)
- I spent 8 months in London in 1968 and never heard it. I have a couple of British "cookery" books and I'm pretty sure that they don't either. It wuz Aleta who wrote the article -- maybe it's a Digger thing.... Hayford Peirce 16:30, 3 March 2008 (CST)
- Maybe, but my Oxford Dictionary just says it's 'arch.' Ro Thorpe 16:36, 3 March 2008 (CST)
- Was that "archaic", Ro, or "archetypal"? ;)
- Haven't you read any British literature, Sanger? And the rest of you? P)
- You can put "formerly" if you want, because I haven't lived in England in...mumble...mumble...years, but older folks of a certain class always said "receipt" back in the day.
- AND, FYI, I just checked my American dictionary. Definition no. 1 for 'receipt'=(drum roll) "RECIPE"!
- Aleta Curry 20:33, 3 March 2008 (CST)
- Maybe, but my Oxford Dictionary just says it's 'arch.' Ro Thorpe 16:36, 3 March 2008 (CST)