Talk:Qigong: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Gary Giamboi
imported>D. Matt Innis
Line 24: Line 24:


Hi, Matt, I added some more as per your suggestions. [[User:Gary Giamboi|Gary Giamboi]] 16:36, 30 June 2007 (EDT)
Hi, Matt, I added some more as per your suggestions. [[User:Gary Giamboi|Gary Giamboi]] 16:36, 30 June 2007 (EDT)
Definitely a step in the right direction.  One of the things I noticed was this sentence, and it explained a lot to me when I read it:
*This is because in ancient times, since people could not see oxygen, they believed we inhaled Qi or energy. Later, even after the discovery of air, the notion of breathing in some kind of Universal Cosmic Energy remained and also became synonymous with breathing in air.
I seem to remember something from one of my readings about (and you would know better than I) the flow of energy starts in the lungs (because we breathe it in) and it concentrates in the area of the kidneys and how it forms something (ying?).  In other words, bile, blood, feces, urine, etc., are all places where the effects of these energies can be seen, right.  Modern medicine studies these chemically.  I think a lot of these terms can be explained this way... we can get people to understand that these "concepts" make sense, no matter what strange words are used to describe it.  See what I mean? In other words, we don't know what this energy is anymore than we know what holds an oxygen molecule to iron in hemoglobin, other than it is a form of energy that is transferred from one place to another by the blood. I seem to be getting the idea that Qigong is an attempt to focus this "energy".  I know that this is a very rudimentary attempt to expain anything, but am I close? --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 16:37, 30 June 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:37, 30 June 2007


Article Checklist for "Qigong"
Workgroup category or categories Healing Arts Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Matt Innis (Talk) 18:59, 20 June 2007 (CDT) Bruce M.Tindall

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Removed link

I removed the following link, as instructed by the CZ Self-Promotion policy, because it links to a site with which the author is associated:

Bruce M.Tindall 12:55, 5 April 2007 (CDT)

Get this in shape

Hi Gary. This is a good start for an article. I think you could write something really informative here, but it needs to take a more neutral stance concerning the concept of Qi and energy. The article starts to describe Qi, but then moves on. Is it real? Is it measurable? Is it a metaphor? Do chinese still believe this is real? Is it a New Age therapy, etc., etc.. If we do this right, we can develop the other energy concepts accordingly. What do you think? --Matt Innis (Talk) 19:36, 20 June 2007 (CDT)

Hi, Matt, I added some more as per your suggestions. Gary Giamboi 16:36, 30 June 2007 (EDT)

Definitely a step in the right direction. One of the things I noticed was this sentence, and it explained a lot to me when I read it:

  • This is because in ancient times, since people could not see oxygen, they believed we inhaled Qi or energy. Later, even after the discovery of air, the notion of breathing in some kind of Universal Cosmic Energy remained and also became synonymous with breathing in air.

I seem to remember something from one of my readings about (and you would know better than I) the flow of energy starts in the lungs (because we breathe it in) and it concentrates in the area of the kidneys and how it forms something (ying?). In other words, bile, blood, feces, urine, etc., are all places where the effects of these energies can be seen, right. Modern medicine studies these chemically. I think a lot of these terms can be explained this way... we can get people to understand that these "concepts" make sense, no matter what strange words are used to describe it. See what I mean? In other words, we don't know what this energy is anymore than we know what holds an oxygen molecule to iron in hemoglobin, other than it is a form of energy that is transferred from one place to another by the blood. I seem to be getting the idea that Qigong is an attempt to focus this "energy". I know that this is a very rudimentary attempt to expain anything, but am I close? --Matt Innis (Talk) 16:37, 30 June 2007 (CDT)