Talk:Heinrich Himmler: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(keep the psychohistory)
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(Is redefining psychological/psychiatric specialized vocabulary informative?)
Line 7: Line 7:
I think it is better to remove it. Also the "sadistic nature" in the lead. /[[User:Pieter Kuiper|Pieter Kuiper]] 18:54, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
I think it is better to remove it. Also the "sadistic nature" in the lead. /[[User:Pieter Kuiper|Pieter Kuiper]] 18:54, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
::this is a paraphrase of the leading historian on the subject writing in the leading history journal. Better keep it in for the readers who like psychohistory--it's hard to think of a better subject for this technique. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 19:19, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
::this is a paraphrase of the leading historian on the subject writing in the leading history journal. Better keep it in for the readers who like psychohistory--it's hard to think of a better subject for this technique. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 19:19, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
:::"Sadism" is a specific paraphilia, with the most accepted medical definition being in the ''Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed.'', of the American Psychiatric Association. It has been refined to exclude those who employ erotic pain as part of an otherwise functional sex life; the usual interpretation is that sadism, masochism, or assorted other paraphilias either become an absolute requirement to have sex, or become the entire sex life.
:::Note, however, that the term specifically relates to the association of the infliction of pain with sexual excitement. The most brutal torturer in history, if his acts triggered no sexual association, would not be, in psychiatric terms, a sadist.
:::There are a substantial number of reports indicating that Heydrich was a true sadist, such as accounts of his rough treatment of prostitutes at Berlin bordellos. Himmler tended to distance himself bureaucratically from the actual mistreatment; while death is not strictly part of sadism, it is notable that he fainted on viewing a genocidal execution.
:::Whether someone is a leading historian or not, I don't like to see scholars in one field redefining  very specific terms used in another. Heinrich Himmler, I am confident, could be checked off on quite a few DSM-IV diagnostic codes, but I'd like to see specifics that he met the criteria for sadism. Otherwise, I recommend removing it.
:::For that matter, "analsadistic"?  Definition? It paraphrases a developmental concept from Freud, which, to the best of my knowledge, is totally discredited. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:11, 27 June 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:11, 27 June 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition German Nazi leader, head of the Schutzstaffel (SS) party elite; committed suicide after being captured at the end of World War II [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories History, Politics and Military [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  Nazism
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Analsadistic?

Is this an enlightening sentence?

The psychic process of dehumanization and extermination may be conceptualized as regression to the analsadistic phase of psychic development on the part of both inmates and S.S. guards of the extermination camps.

I think it is better to remove it. Also the "sadistic nature" in the lead. /Pieter Kuiper 18:54, 27 October 2007 (CDT)

this is a paraphrase of the leading historian on the subject writing in the leading history journal. Better keep it in for the readers who like psychohistory--it's hard to think of a better subject for this technique. Richard Jensen 19:19, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
"Sadism" is a specific paraphilia, with the most accepted medical definition being in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed., of the American Psychiatric Association. It has been refined to exclude those who employ erotic pain as part of an otherwise functional sex life; the usual interpretation is that sadism, masochism, or assorted other paraphilias either become an absolute requirement to have sex, or become the entire sex life.
Note, however, that the term specifically relates to the association of the infliction of pain with sexual excitement. The most brutal torturer in history, if his acts triggered no sexual association, would not be, in psychiatric terms, a sadist.
There are a substantial number of reports indicating that Heydrich was a true sadist, such as accounts of his rough treatment of prostitutes at Berlin bordellos. Himmler tended to distance himself bureaucratically from the actual mistreatment; while death is not strictly part of sadism, it is notable that he fainted on viewing a genocidal execution.
Whether someone is a leading historian or not, I don't like to see scholars in one field redefining very specific terms used in another. Heinrich Himmler, I am confident, could be checked off on quite a few DSM-IV diagnostic codes, but I'd like to see specifics that he met the criteria for sadism. Otherwise, I recommend removing it.
For that matter, "analsadistic"? Definition? It paraphrases a developmental concept from Freud, which, to the best of my knowledge, is totally discredited. Howard C. Berkowitz 21:11, 27 June 2008 (CDT)