Talk:First Crusade: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chris Day m (Talk:The First Crusade moved to Talk:First Crusade over redirect: REMEMBER_click_move_all_subpages) |
imported>Todd Coles No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::Arghh!!! Can someone please move it for me, for some reason I can't get my head around this!!! [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 17:36, 16 March 2009 (UTC) | :::Arghh!!! Can someone please move it for me, for some reason I can't get my head around this!!! [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 17:36, 16 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::: Let me give it a closer read and I'll let you know. --[[User:Todd Coles|Todd Coles]] 17:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:48, 16 March 2009
For this article I am using a variety of sources, but in particular John France, Stephen Runciman and Jonathon Riley Smith. As the three great 'men' of Crusading historiography I thought this might lead to a balanced account. The article will be broken up from the Princes Crusade like this: 1) Europe to Constantinople, 2) Nicea, 3) Dorylaeum, 4) Siege of Antioch, 5) Road to Jerusalem, 6) Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem. Of course, anyone else is more than welcome to join in. Denis Cavanagh 11:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Looks good, the only thing I can think of is that this probably needs to be moved to First Crusade and drop the The. --Todd Coles 16:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Todd, what do you think of the way I've split it up amongst the major Princes - too bulky? I thought the way I had it before was less reader friendly. Denis Cavanagh 17:23, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Arghh!!! Can someone please move it for me, for some reason I can't get my head around this!!! Denis Cavanagh 17:36, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Let me give it a closer read and I'll let you know. --Todd Coles 17:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Arghh!!! Can someone please move it for me, for some reason I can't get my head around this!!! Denis Cavanagh 17:36, 16 March 2009 (UTC)