Talk:Félix d'Hérelle/Draft

From Citizendium
< Talk:Félix d'Hérelle
Revision as of 00:51, 22 June 2007 by imported>Stephen Ewen (→‎Images)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Toapprove.png
David Tribe has nominated the version dated 22 Jun 20072007 of this article for approval. Other editors may also sign to support approval. The Biology Workgroup is overseeing this approval. Unless this notice is removed, the article will be approved on Jun 25, 2007.

-->

David Tribe has made now more typographical adjustments to the page and is not an author. However he is expert in the field and teaches senior year college courses in this topic. But the author is more expert than David Tribe

URL pointer first set at http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/F%C3%A9lix_d%27H%C3%A9relleDavid Tribe 23:39, 21 June 2007 (CDT)


Images

Unless it is something about French copyright law, or something else, Image:D'Herelle,_Eliava,_Makashvili.JPG and Image:Older_d'Herelle.jpg would not seem to qualify as {{PD}} (Public Domain) images. Help me out here, someone please. ---Stephen Ewen 14:26, 17 June 2007 (CDT)

These photos are old and the provenance is murky. The former was taken at the Eliava Institute in the Soviet Union, which I am pretty sure did not even HAVE copyright law at the time. It was published in Science 25 October 2002:Vol. 298. no. 5594, pp. 728 - 731 DOI: 10.1126/science.298.5594.728 and credited COURTESY OF A. SULAKVELIDZE who is Alexander Sulakvelidze, a founder of Intralytix Inc. The latter is reproduced in many places without any indication given for its source. ...said David Tribe (talk) (Please sign your talk page posts by simply adding four tildes, ~~~~.)

Okay, but don't you think we should avoid outrightly calling photos "Public Domain" when we lack the authority to do so? Probably public domain does not equal public domain.

{{Provenanceunknown-fairuse-editor
|editor name=
|workgroup name=
|article name=
}}

Ideally, File:Older d'Herelle.jpg/Permission should contain documented attempts to locate the copyright holder; David, perhaps you can make a statement there saying simply that the image is reproduced in many places without any indication given for its source, so there is no lead to even try to follow.

Stephen Ewen 00:49, 22 June 2007 (CDT)