Talk:Chips (food): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anton Sweeney
(Drooping?)
imported>Hayford Peirce
(→‎Drooping: I agree that this is the wrong way to put it)
Line 16: Line 16:


Surely the other way around? A cardboardy fry could be used to jab someone in the eye after being cooked; by contrast, a thicker chip tends to be softer and therefore more liable to drooping. Stand on a dropped fry and it might puncture your shoe - whereas a chip gets mashed into your sole. [[User:Anton Sweeney|Anton Sweeney]] 18:24, 14 June 2007 (CDT)
Surely the other way around? A cardboardy fry could be used to jab someone in the eye after being cooked; by contrast, a thicker chip tends to be softer and therefore more liable to drooping. Stand on a dropped fry and it might puncture your shoe - whereas a chip gets mashed into your sole. [[User:Anton Sweeney|Anton Sweeney]] 18:24, 14 June 2007 (CDT)
:As a fairly experienced cook, I think the key element here is how *long* the individual item has been cooked.  A skinny little french fry can be overcooked until it's like a stick.  And obviously if you take an Idaho potato and cut it into, say, 4 lengthwise pieces, each piece is gonna be so thick that it will *never* droop.  But otherwise I think you're right in one sense: I think this "droop" business should be eliminated.  It's clearly one of those things where it's sometimes this, sometimes that....

Revision as of 18:27, 14 June 2007


Article Checklist for "Chips (food)"
Workgroup category or categories Food Science Workgroup, Health Sciences Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by John Stephenson 05:26, 14 June 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Drooping?

"[Chips]... are very similar to French fries, the distinction being that fries are much thinner and may droop. A chip, by contrast, will always remain straight even when a little pressure is applied."

Surely the other way around? A cardboardy fry could be used to jab someone in the eye after being cooked; by contrast, a thicker chip tends to be softer and therefore more liable to drooping. Stand on a dropped fry and it might puncture your shoe - whereas a chip gets mashed into your sole. Anton Sweeney 18:24, 14 June 2007 (CDT)

As a fairly experienced cook, I think the key element here is how *long* the individual item has been cooked. A skinny little french fry can be overcooked until it's like a stick. And obviously if you take an Idaho potato and cut it into, say, 4 lengthwise pieces, each piece is gonna be so thick that it will *never* droop. But otherwise I think you're right in one sense: I think this "droop" business should be eliminated. It's clearly one of those things where it's sometimes this, sometimes that....