Production function/Tutorials: Difference between revisions
imported>Nick Gardner (→Supply) |
imported>Nick Gardner (→Supply) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
===Supply=== | ===Supply=== | ||
Piero Saffra objected on the grounds that, by bidding up the prices of inputs to suppliers of substitutes, the increased output of a product expansion could increase the demand for that product, thus | Piero Saffra objected on the grounds that, by bidding up the prices of inputs to suppliers of substitutes, the increased output of a product expansion could increase the demand for that product, thus violatimg the necessary condition that demand must be independent of supply | ||
<ref>[http://cupid.ecom.unimelb.edu.au/het/sraffa/sraffa26.htm Piero Sraffa: "The Laws of Return Under Competitive Conditions", ''The Economic Journal'' December 1926]</ref>. Jacob Viner had justified the long-run diminishing returns thesis by arguing that competitors for the required inputs would bid up their prices <ref>Jacob Viner: "Cost Curves and Supply Curves", in ''Readings In Price Theory'', edited by G. J. Stigler and K. E. Boulding. Irwin, 1952.</ref>, but Lionel Robbins argued that Viner's justification was incomplete in cases where the market did not contain other users of an input | <ref>[http://cupid.ecom.unimelb.edu.au/het/sraffa/sraffa26.htm Piero Sraffa: "The Laws of Return Under Competitive Conditions", ''The Economic Journal'' December 1926]</ref>. Jacob Viner had justified the long-run diminishing returns thesis by arguing that competitors for the required inputs would bid up their prices <ref>Jacob Viner: "Cost Curves and Supply Curves", in ''Readings In Price Theory'', edited by G. J. Stigler and K. E. Boulding. Irwin, 1952.</ref>, but Lionel Robbins argued that Viner's justification was incomplete in cases where the market did not contain other users of an input | ||
<ref>[http://www.econlib.org/Library/NPDBooks/Thirlby/bcthLS2.html#Robbins,%20Remarks%20on%20certain%20aspects Lionel Robbins: "Remarks Upon Certain Aspects of The Theory of Costs", ''Economic Journal'' March 1934.]</ref> | <ref>[http://www.econlib.org/Library/NPDBooks/Thirlby/bcthLS2.html#Robbins,%20Remarks%20on%20certain%20aspects Lionel Robbins: "Remarks Upon Certain Aspects of The Theory of Costs", ''Economic Journal'' March 1934.]</ref> | ||
Revision as of 14:59, 3 September 2008
The Cobb-Douglas production function
The Cobb-Douglas function has the form:
- Y = A. Lα . Cβ,
where
- Y = output, C = capital input, L = labour input,
- and A, α and β are constants determined by the technology employed.
If α = β = 1, the function represents constant returns to scale,
If α + β < 1, it represents diminishing returns to scale, and,
If α + β > 1, it represents increasing returns to scale.
It can be shown that, in a perfectly competitive economy, α is labour's share of the value of output, and β is capital's share.
Dissenting voices
Supply
Piero Saffra objected on the grounds that, by bidding up the prices of inputs to suppliers of substitutes, the increased output of a product expansion could increase the demand for that product, thus violatimg the necessary condition that demand must be independent of supply [1]. Jacob Viner had justified the long-run diminishing returns thesis by arguing that competitors for the required inputs would bid up their prices [2], but Lionel Robbins argued that Viner's justification was incomplete in cases where the market did not contain other users of an input [3]
Production
References
- ↑ Piero Sraffa: "The Laws of Return Under Competitive Conditions", The Economic Journal December 1926
- ↑ Jacob Viner: "Cost Curves and Supply Curves", in Readings In Price Theory, edited by G. J. Stigler and K. E. Boulding. Irwin, 1952.
- ↑ Lionel Robbins: "Remarks Upon Certain Aspects of The Theory of Costs", Economic Journal March 1934.