Production function/Tutorials

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Tutorials [?]
Tutorials relating to the topic of Production function.

The learning curve

On a P per cent learning curve, every time the length of the production run is doubled, the unit cost is reduced by a factor p.

(p being the percentage P expressed as a fraction)

The cost, Cn of the nth unit is given by:

Cn= C1.n-b


b = (-logp)(log2)

The Cobb-Douglas production function

The Cobb-Douglas function has the form:

Y = A. Lα . Cβ,


Y = output,  C = capital input, L = labour input,
and A, α and β are constants determined by the technology employed.

If α = β = 1, the function represents constant returns to scale,

If α + β < 1, it represents diminishing returns to scale, and,

If α + β > 1, it represents increasing returns to scale.

It can be shown that, in a perfectly competitive economy, α is labour's share of the value of output, and β is capital's share.

Dissenting voices


Piero Saffra objected to the law of supply and demand on the grounds that, by bidding up the prices of inputs to suppliers of substitutes, the increased output of a product expansion could increase the demand for that product, thus violatimg the necessary condition that demand must be independent of supply [1]. Jacob Viner had justified the long-run diminishing returns thesis by arguing that competitors for the required inputs would bid up their prices [2], but Lionel Robbins argued that Viner's justification was incomplete in cases where the market did not contain other users of an input and raised a number of other more complex objections [3].


Joan Robinson's objection to the production function equation was that she could not envisage a unit of measurement that could be applied both to output on the one, side and to labour and capital on the other side of the equation. Sir Henry Phelps Brown maintained that the apparent empirical support of the Cobb-Douglas function was in fact merely the consequence of an accounting identity [4] (a conclusion that was later supported by Felipe and McCombie [5]). Anwar Shaikh claimed that the belief that the Cobb-Douglas function has been empirically confirmed is mistaken because it is in fact consistent with a wide variety of possible data [6].