Polarizability: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
(New page: {{subpages}} In physics, '''polarizability''' describes the ease by which an electric charge-distribution ρ can be polarized under the influence of an external electric field...)
 
imported>Paul Wormer
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
In [[physics]], '''polarizability''' describes the ease by which  an electric  charge-distribution ρ can be polarized under the influence of an external [[electric field]]. An electric  field '''E''' is a [[vector]]—has  direction—that by definition  "pushes" a positive charge in the direction of the vector and "pulls" a negative electric charge in opposite direction (against the direction of '''E'''). Because of this "push-pull" effect the charge-distribution ρ will distort, with a build-up of  positive charge on that side of ρ to which '''E''' is pointing and a build-up of negative charge on the other side of ρ. One calls this distortion  the ''polarization'' of the charge-distribution. Of course, since it is implicitly assumed that ρ is stable, there are internal forces that keep the charges together. These internal charges resist the polarization and determine the magnitude of the polarizability.  
In [[physics]], the '''polarizability''' of an electric charge-distribution ρ describes the ease by which  ρ can be polarized under the influence of an external [[electric field]]. To explain the concept of ''polarization'' of a charge distribution, it is noted that an electric  field '''E''' is a [[vector]]—has  direction—that by definition  "pushes" a positive charge in the direction of the vector and "pulls" a negative electric charge in opposite direction (against the direction of '''E'''). Because of this "push-pull" effect the charge-distribution ρ will distort, with a build-up of  positive charge on that side of ρ to which '''E''' is pointing and a build-up of negative charge on the other side of ρ. One calls this distortion  the polarization of the charge-distribution. Since it is implicitly assumed that ρ is stable, there are internal forces that keep the charges together. These internal charges resist the polarization and determine the magnitude of the polarizability.  


The concept of polarizability is very important in [[atomic physics|atomic]] and [[molecular physics]]. In atoms and molecules the electronic charge-distribution is stable, as follows from [[quantum mechanics|quantum mechanical]] laws, and an external electric field polarizes the electronic charge cloud. The amount of shifting of charge can be quantitatively expressed in terms of an ''induced [[dipole moment]]''.
The concept of polarizability is very important in [[atomic physics|atomic]] and [[molecular physics]]. In atoms and molecules the electronic charge-distribution is stable, as follows from [[quantum mechanics|quantum mechanical]] laws, and an external electric field polarizes the electronic charge cloud. The amount of shifting of charge can be quantitatively expressed in terms of an ''induced [[dipole moment]]''.
Line 55: Line 55:


==Units==
==Units==
'''(To be continued)'''
From the defining equation follows that '''p''' has the dimension charge times distance, which in [[SI]] units is C m ([[coulomb]] times meter). In [[Gaussian units]] this is statC cm ([[statcoulomb]] times centimeter). An electric field has dimension voltage divided by distance, so that in SI units '''E''' has dimension V/m and in Gaussian units [[statvolt|statV]]/cm. Hence the dimension of α is
<div align="center">
<table width="60%">
<tr><td width="15%"><b>SI:</b> <td>C&thinsp;m<sup>2</sup>&thinsp;V<sup>&minus;1</sup>  </tr>
<tr><td> <font style = "vertical-align: -80%; font-weight: bolder">Gaussian:</font></td><td> statC&thinsp;cm<sup>2</sup>&thinsp;V<sup>&minus;1</sup> = cm<sup>3</sup>,
</tr></table></div>
where we used that in Gaussian units the dimension of V is equal to statC/cm (because of [[Coulomb's law]]). In Gaussian units the polarizability has dimension volume, and accordingly polarizability is often considered as a measure for the size of the charge-distribution (usually  an atom or a molecule).


<!--
The conversion between the two units is:
:::<math>
\alpha_{\mathrm{SI}} = \tfrac{10 }{c^2}\;\alpha_{\mathrm{Gaussian}} = 4\pi \epsilon_0\; 10^{-6}\; \alpha_{\mathrm{Gaussian}},
</math>
here ''c'' is the [[speed of light]] (&asymp; 3&times;10<sup>8</sup> m/s), 4&pi;&epsilon;<sub>0</sub> = 10<sup>7</sup>/''c''<sup>2</sup> (see [[electric constant]]) and the suffix on the symbol &alpha; indicates the unit in which the  polarizability is expressed.


Sometimes one defines the polarizability in SI units by the equation
:<math>
\mathbf{p} \equiv 4\pi \epsilon_0\; \alpha'_\mathrm{SI}\; \mathbf{E}.
</math>
This definition has the advantage that &alpha;'<sub><small>SI</small></sub> has dimension volume (m<sup>3</sup>). Clearly
:<math>
\alpha'_\mathrm{SI} = 10^{-6} \, \alpha_{\mathrm{Gaussian}},
</math>
where the power of ten is due to converting from m to cm.


Polarizability has the SI units of C·m<sup>2</sup>·V<sup>-1</sup> = A<sup>2</sup>·s<sup>4</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup> but is more often expressed as polarizability volume with units of cm<sup>3</sup> or in [[Angstrom|Å]]<sup>3</sup> = 10<sup>-24</sup> cm<sup>3</sup>.


<math>\alpha \boldsymbol{(cm^3) = } \frac{10^6}{ 4 \pi \epsilon _0 }\alpha \boldsymbol{(C \cdot m^2 \cdot V^{-1})}</math>  where <math>\epsilon _0 </math> is the [[permittivity|vacuum permittivity]].
'''(To be continued)'''
 
The polarizability of individual particles is related to the average [[electric susceptibility]] of the medium by the [[Clausius-Mossotti relation]].
 
 
-->

Revision as of 07:13, 27 November 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

In physics, the polarizability of an electric charge-distribution ρ describes the ease by which ρ can be polarized under the influence of an external electric field. To explain the concept of polarization of a charge distribution, it is noted that an electric field E is a vector—has direction—that by definition "pushes" a positive charge in the direction of the vector and "pulls" a negative electric charge in opposite direction (against the direction of E). Because of this "push-pull" effect the charge-distribution ρ will distort, with a build-up of positive charge on that side of ρ to which E is pointing and a build-up of negative charge on the other side of ρ. One calls this distortion the polarization of the charge-distribution. Since it is implicitly assumed that ρ is stable, there are internal forces that keep the charges together. These internal charges resist the polarization and determine the magnitude of the polarizability.

The concept of polarizability is very important in atomic and molecular physics. In atoms and molecules the electronic charge-distribution is stable, as follows from quantum mechanical laws, and an external electric field polarizes the electronic charge cloud. The amount of shifting of charge can be quantitatively expressed in terms of an induced dipole moment.

Theory

A dipole moment of a continuous charge-distribution is defined by

If there is no external field we call the dipole permanent, written as pperm. A permanent dipole moment may or may not be equal to zero. For highly symmetric charge-distributions (for instance those with an inversion center), the permanent moment is zero.

Under influence of an electric field the charge-distribution will distort and the dipole moment will change,

where pind is the induced dipole moment, i.e., the change in dipole due to the polarization of the charge-distribution. Assuming a linear dependence in the field, we define the polarizability by the following expression

This relation can be generalized to higher powers in E (in the general case one uses a Taylor series), the polarizabilities arising as factors of E2, and E3 are called hyperpolarizabilities and hyper-hyperpolarizabilities, respectively.

So far we assumed that p is parallel to E, i.e., that α is a single real number, a scalar. It can happen that the two vectors are non-parallel, in that case the defining relation takes the form

with

By writing these two vectors in component form we implicitly assumed the presence of a Cartesian coordinate system. The polarizability α is expressed with respect to the very same coordinate system by a matrix,

We know that choice of another Cartesian basis changes the column vectors pind and E, while the physics of the situation is unchanged, neither the electric field, nor the induced dipole changes, only their representation by column vectors changes. Similarly, upon choice of another basis the polarizibility α is represented by another 3×3 matrix. This means that α is a second rank (because there are two indices) Cartesian tensor, the polarizability tensor of the charge-distribution.

Units

From the defining equation follows that p has the dimension charge times distance, which in SI units is C m (coulomb times meter). In Gaussian units this is statC cm (statcoulomb times centimeter). An electric field has dimension voltage divided by distance, so that in SI units E has dimension V/m and in Gaussian units statV/cm. Hence the dimension of α is

SI: C m2 V−1
Gaussian: statC cm2 V−1 = cm3,

where we used that in Gaussian units the dimension of V is equal to statC/cm (because of Coulomb's law). In Gaussian units the polarizability has dimension volume, and accordingly polarizability is often considered as a measure for the size of the charge-distribution (usually an atom or a molecule).

The conversion between the two units is:

here c is the speed of light (≈ 3×108 m/s), 4πε0 = 107/c2 (see electric constant) and the suffix on the symbol α indicates the unit in which the polarizability is expressed.

Sometimes one defines the polarizability in SI units by the equation

This definition has the advantage that α'SI has dimension volume (m3). Clearly

where the power of ten is due to converting from m to cm.


(To be continued)