Orphan works: Difference between revisions
imported>Stephen Ewen (287 words now) |
imported>Stephen Ewen mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Although the problem of orphan works is most acute in the United States, the problem is global. Large repositories of orphaned works are frequently held by libraries, museums, and other collections, but they fear to disperse them. It is thought that the uncertainty surrounding the use of orphan works seriously inhibits the public good that would otherwise come from their use. | Although the problem of orphan works is most acute in the United States, the problem is global. Large repositories of orphaned works are frequently held by libraries, museums, and other collections, but they fear to disperse them. It is thought that the uncertainty surrounding the use of orphan works seriously inhibits the public good that would otherwise come from their use. | ||
Canada and the United Kingdom have enacted relatively narrow laws in an attempt to free-up use of orphan works. The United State's [[Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998]] added minor protections for users of orphan works, but were not enough to induce significant usages thereof. During 2005, at the urging of numerous representatives of the [[United States Congress]], the U.S. Copyright Office studied issues raised by orphan works, and strongly concluded that substantial legislative action was warranted to free orphan works beyond the often uncertain bounds of fair use. The recommendations have not yet been acted upon. | Canada and the United Kingdom have enacted relatively narrow laws in an attempt to free-up use of orphan works. The United State's [[Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998]] added minor protections for users of orphan works, but they were not enough to induce significant usages thereof. During 2005, at the urging of numerous representatives of the [[United States Congress]], the U.S. Copyright Office studied issues raised by orphan works, and strongly concluded that substantial legislative action was warranted to free orphan works beyond the often uncertain bounds of fair use. The recommendations have not yet been acted upon. | ||
Revision as of 03:08, 22 October 2007
Orphan works is a term used to describe the situation where a copyright owner cannot be identified and located by someone who is seeking permission to use the work. In the most common situation, the inability of a potential user of such a work to locate the copyright holder produces uncertainty about the use of the work, since it is possible, however remotely so, that a copyright holder may surface after the use has begun and bring an infringement action, leading to the possibility of compensatory damages against the user of the work. When the use of an orphan works is not subject to a strong fair use claim, use of the work effectively stops before it even starts.
Although the problem of orphan works is most acute in the United States, the problem is global. Large repositories of orphaned works are frequently held by libraries, museums, and other collections, but they fear to disperse them. It is thought that the uncertainty surrounding the use of orphan works seriously inhibits the public good that would otherwise come from their use.
Canada and the United Kingdom have enacted relatively narrow laws in an attempt to free-up use of orphan works. The United State's Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998 added minor protections for users of orphan works, but they were not enough to induce significant usages thereof. During 2005, at the urging of numerous representatives of the United States Congress, the U.S. Copyright Office studied issues raised by orphan works, and strongly concluded that substantial legislative action was warranted to free orphan works beyond the often uncertain bounds of fair use. The recommendations have not yet been acted upon.