Open Knowledge Conference/Program/Local Government Data: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(started)
 
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(→‎Notes and comments: pasted in from http://piratepad.net/ep/pad/view/kDyWnVVfrn/rev.3358)
Line 29: Line 29:
and wikilink as appropriate.
and wikilink as appropriate.
-->
-->
Type comments here.
Talk 2: Chris Taggart
Title: Open Local data, Openly Local and The Open Election Data Project
 
* It's been a good year, opendata.gov.uk, etc
 
* Electoral data is a mess.
 
* Councils, NDPB (quangos) are opaque
 
* History of OpenlyLocal
 
* Manchester project call MCC work for you
 
* Screen scrape 140 councils (of 434)
 
* availaible as RDF, JSON, XML
 
* Future
 
* more data
 
* Use case: Private Eye
 
* order investigation by the district auditor was a buried PDF
 
* Local authorities now have a duty to engage
 
* About power = assymetry of information
 
* Raises the barriers to involvement.
 
* Private companies who are outsourced by public money are closed.
 
* OpenElectionData project
 
* *succeed, or fail forward*
 
* there is no public database of local election results
 
* publish RDFa from page.
 
* beginning to compile a database of election results
 
* if it fails, there is a good argument for legislation
 
* guessing anywhere from 12-40 councils who will publish data.
 
* What we need?
 
* A Freedom of Data act - too many different bodies to individually organise
 
* central gov't needs to change how IT is done. <-- change use of MS Office?
 
* "enabler or blocker" [sounds a bit like G.W. Bush's with us or against us meme -Tom]
 
* we just need an 'axis of evil' /dff
 
* Access of Evil is more appropriate, since Access is evil. -Tom :)

Revision as of 07:23, 24 April 2010



Title

Local Government Data

Authors

Chris Taggart

Keywords

open data, open government

Abstract

Paste abstract in here.

Notes and comments

Talk 2: Chris Taggart Title: Open Local data, Openly Local and The Open Election Data Project

  • It's been a good year, opendata.gov.uk, etc
  • Electoral data is a mess.
  • Councils, NDPB (quangos) are opaque
  • History of OpenlyLocal
  • Manchester project call MCC work for you
  • Screen scrape 140 councils (of 434)
  • availaible as RDF, JSON, XML
  • Future
  • more data
  • Use case: Private Eye
  • order investigation by the district auditor was a buried PDF
  • Local authorities now have a duty to engage
  • About power = assymetry of information
  • Raises the barriers to involvement.
  • Private companies who are outsourced by public money are closed.
  • OpenElectionData project
  • *succeed, or fail forward*
  • there is no public database of local election results
  • publish RDFa from page.
  • beginning to compile a database of election results
  • if it fails, there is a good argument for legislation
  • guessing anywhere from 12-40 councils who will publish data.
  • What we need?
  • A Freedom of Data act - too many different bodies to individually organise
  • central gov't needs to change how IT is done. <-- change use of MS Office?
  • "enabler or blocker" [sounds a bit like G.W. Bush's with us or against us meme -Tom]
  • we just need an 'axis of evil' /dff
  • Access of Evil is more appropriate, since Access is evil. -Tom :)