M1132 engineer squad vehicle: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(New page: A representative of a branch in combat engineering vehicle (CEV) design, the U.S. Army '''M1132 engineer squad vehicle (ESV)''' is an example of a "light CEV". They are part of the...)
 
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
Traditional CEVs have been heavy vehicles built on [[tank (military)|tank chassis]]. Tank-based CEVs are integral parts of tank-centric units, but they are too heavy for quick deployment. Further, they may be too large for [[urban combat]].  
Traditional CEVs have been heavy vehicles built on [[tank (military)|tank chassis]]. Tank-based CEVs are integral parts of tank-centric units, but they are too heavy for quick deployment. Further, they may be too large for [[urban combat]].  


Some of the design tradeoffs in the M1132, which are assigned to the Engineer Company, Brigade Special Troops Battalion, [[Stryker Brigade Combat Team]], have been described by the Army Project Management Office: <blockquote>[the] Engineer element of the Brigade is designed to conduct mobility operations to maintain the momentum of the force. Engineers must be capable of creating lanes through obstacles (to include surface laid and buried minefields) to support rapid maneuver and self-extraction. Engineers must also be capable of rubble reduction to support maneuver, especially in a MOUT environment, until other engineer rubble clearance assets can be brought forward.
Some of the design tradeoffs in the M1132, which are assigned to the Engineer Company, Brigade Special Troops Battalion, [[Stryker Brigade Combat Team]] (SBCT), have been described by the SBCT Project Management Office: <blockquote>[the] Engineer element of the Brigade is designed to conduct mobility operations to maintain the momentum of the force. Engineers must be capable of creating lanes through obstacles (to include surface laid and buried minefields) to support rapid maneuver and self-extraction. Engineers must also be capable of rubble reduction to support maneuver, especially in a MOUT environment, until other engineer rubble clearance assets can be brought forward.


The operational intent is to bypass obstacles when tactically feasible, utilize stand-off breaching systems where possible and only in an emergency situation utilize mechanical breaching systems that may put the ESV at risk. A system of manned and unmanned (robotics) sensors and clearance devices is required to fully meet this requirement. The ESV with its attachments provides a partial solution to this need, primarily for clearance of hastily emplaced mines on hard surfaces and rubble. The ESV will provide the means for Engineer squad to control future robotic based systems from the protection of the vehicle.</blockquote>
The operational intent is to bypass obstacles when tactically feasible, utilize stand-off breaching systems where possible and only in an emergency situation utilize mechanical breaching systems that may put the ESV at risk. A system of manned and unmanned (robotics) sensors and clearance devices is required to fully meet this requirement. The ESV with its attachments provides a partial solution to this need, primarily for clearance of hastily emplaced mines on hard surfaces and rubble. The ESV will provide the means for Engineer squad to control future robotic based systems from the protection of the vehicle.<ref>{{citation
| url = http://www.sbct.army.mil/Engineer-Squad-Vehicle.html
| title = Engineer Squad Vehicle
| publisher = [[U.S. Army]] [[Stryker Brigade Combat Team]] Project Management Office}}</ref></blockquote>
==References==
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 11:06, 26 July 2010

A representative of a branch in combat engineering vehicle (CEV) design, the U.S. Army M1132 engineer squad vehicle (ESV) is an example of a "light CEV". They are part of the Stryker wheeled armored fighting vehicle] family.

Traditional CEVs have been heavy vehicles built on tank chassis. Tank-based CEVs are integral parts of tank-centric units, but they are too heavy for quick deployment. Further, they may be too large for urban combat.

Some of the design tradeoffs in the M1132, which are assigned to the Engineer Company, Brigade Special Troops Battalion, Stryker Brigade Combat Team (SBCT), have been described by the SBCT Project Management Office:

[the] Engineer element of the Brigade is designed to conduct mobility operations to maintain the momentum of the force. Engineers must be capable of creating lanes through obstacles (to include surface laid and buried minefields) to support rapid maneuver and self-extraction. Engineers must also be capable of rubble reduction to support maneuver, especially in a MOUT environment, until other engineer rubble clearance assets can be brought forward. The operational intent is to bypass obstacles when tactically feasible, utilize stand-off breaching systems where possible and only in an emergency situation utilize mechanical breaching systems that may put the ESV at risk. A system of manned and unmanned (robotics) sensors and clearance devices is required to fully meet this requirement. The ESV with its attachments provides a partial solution to this need, primarily for clearance of hastily emplaced mines on hard surfaces and rubble. The ESV will provide the means for Engineer squad to control future robotic based systems from the protection of the vehicle.[1]

References