Forti v. Suarez Mason: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: '''Forti v. Suarez Mason''' was a 1987 court case before the US Circuit Court for the Northern District of California. The Court held that torturers were ''hostis humani generis'' ...) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
'''Forti v. Suarez Mason''' was a 1987 court case before the [[US Circuit Court for the Northern District of California]]. The Court held that torturers were ''[[hostis humani generis]]'' and thus subject to the jurisdiction of any country, even though the acts had not taken place in that country, and the parties were not citizens of that country. <ref name=Forti1987>{{cite court | '''Forti v. Suarez Mason''' was a 1987 court case before the [[US Circuit Court for the Northern District of California]]. The Court held that torturers were ''[[hostis humani generis]]'' and thus subject to the jurisdiction of any country, even though the acts had not taken place in that country, and the parties were not citizens of that country. <ref name=Forti1987>{{cite court | ||
|litigants=Forti v. Suarez-Mason | |litigants=Forti v. Suarez-Mason | ||
Revision as of 20:33, 19 February 2009
Forti v. Suarez Mason was a 1987 court case before the US Circuit Court for the Northern District of California. The Court held that torturers were hostis humani generis and thus subject to the jurisdiction of any country, even though the acts had not taken place in that country, and the parties were not citizens of that country. [1]
References
- ↑ Forti v. Suarez-Mason, 672 F. Supp 1531 (US Circuit Court for the Northern District of California 1987)