Filartiga v. Pena-Irala/Related Articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: {{subpages}} ==Parent topics== {{r|International law}} {{r|Hostis humani generis}} {{r|Universal jurisdiction}} {{r|U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals}} ==Subtopics== <!-- List topic...) |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "{{r|Torture}}" to "") |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{r|Forti v. Suarez Mason}} | {{r|Forti v. Suarez Mason}} | ||
{{r|Martinez Baca v. Suarez Mason}} | {{r|Martinez Baca v. Suarez Mason}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:03, 1 April 2024
- See also changes related to Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, or pages that link to Filartiga v. Pena-Irala or to this page or whose text contains "Filartiga v. Pena-Irala".
Parent topics
- International law [r]: Add brief definition or description
- Hostis humani generis [r]: A legal principle that certain acts, such as piracy, slavery and genocide, puts one outside the norms of civilization and makes one an "enemy of all mankind", subject to early forms of universal jurisdiction or summary action [e]
- Universal jurisdiction [r]: A concept in international law that allows a nation to prosecute an individual charged with offenses against humanity, with no requirement that the defendant or victim be a national of the Requesting State or indeed, that there are any links to the Requesting State and the defendant [e]
- U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals [r]: Add brief definition or description
Subtopics
- Forti v. Suarez Mason [r]: A 1987 U.S. case that determined that the principle of hostis humani generis applied to torturers, and thus placed them under universal jurisdiction, such that they could be appreheded by any country even though the torture had taken place in that country, and the parties were not citizens of that country [e]
- Martinez Baca v. Suarez Mason [r]: Add brief definition or description