Talk:Sturm-Liouville theory

From Citizendium
Revision as of 07:21, 6 October 2009 by imported>David E. Volk (Bessel function in S-L seems off, but I am not sure of this.)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Proofs [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A special second order linear ordinary differential equation. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Mathematics and Physics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

Numbered equations

Hi Daniel,

I had to transform the templates provided in the WP article for numbered equations into plain old wikimarkup. I attempted to bring these templates over from WP, but they called many other templates and when I got them all over, the combined result didn't work. I decided to use a simple bit of html that defined a span with right justification and also defined an anchor. To reference the equation you then only need to insert a mediawiki markup referencing the anchor. It wouldn't be hard to turn this all into two templates if you think that would be useful. Dan Nessett 19:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


Bessel equation in S-L form

Is the Bessel equation in S-L form correct? I don't see where the xy' term has gone. Clearly everything was divided by x, and the first term (after division by x) XY becomes (xy')'.

Shouldn't (xy + y') become (xy' + y)'? David E. Volk 13:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Sturm-Liouville_theory&oldid=672222"